From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
edumazet@google.com, petrm@nvidia.com, amcohen@nvidia.com,
danieller@nvidia.com, richardcochran@gmail.com, mlxsw@nvidia.com,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 13/15] mlxsw: spectrum_ptp: Use 'struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock' per ASIC
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2022 11:03:27 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220724080329.2613617-14-idosch@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220724080329.2613617-1-idosch@nvidia.com>
From: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Currently, there is one shared structure that holds the required
structures for PTP clock. Most of the existing fields are relevant only
for Spectrum-1 (cycles, timecounter, and more). Rename the structure to
be specific for Spectrum-1 and align the existing code. Add a common
structure which includes the structures which will be used also for
Spectrum-2. This structure will be returned from clock_init() operation,
as the definition is shared between all ASICs' operations.
Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
---
.../ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_ptp.c | 75 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_ptp.c
index c5ceb4326074..99611dcc5474 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_ptp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_ptp.c
@@ -64,12 +64,16 @@ static const struct rhashtable_params mlxsw_sp1_ptp_unmatched_ht_params = {
struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock {
struct mlxsw_core *core;
+ struct ptp_clock *ptp;
+ struct ptp_clock_info ptp_info;
+};
+
+struct mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock {
+ struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock common;
spinlock_t lock; /* protect this structure */
struct cyclecounter cycles;
struct timecounter tc;
u32 nominal_c_mult;
- struct ptp_clock *ptp;
- struct ptp_clock_info ptp_info;
unsigned long overflow_period;
struct delayed_work overflow_work;
};
@@ -81,10 +85,16 @@ mlxsw_sp1_ptp_state(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp)
common);
}
-static u64 __mlxsw_sp1_ptp_read_frc(struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock *clock,
+static struct mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock *
+mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp)
+{
+ return container_of(ptp, struct mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock, common.ptp_info);
+}
+
+static u64 __mlxsw_sp1_ptp_read_frc(struct mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock *clock,
struct ptp_system_timestamp *sts)
{
- struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core = clock->core;
+ struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core = clock->common.core;
u32 frc_h1, frc_h2, frc_l;
frc_h1 = mlxsw_core_read_frc_h(mlxsw_core);
@@ -105,8 +115,8 @@ static u64 __mlxsw_sp1_ptp_read_frc(struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock *clock,
static u64 mlxsw_sp1_ptp_read_frc(const struct cyclecounter *cc)
{
- struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock *clock =
- container_of(cc, struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock, cycles);
+ struct mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock *clock =
+ container_of(cc, struct mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock, cycles);
return __mlxsw_sp1_ptp_read_frc(clock, NULL) & cc->mask;
}
@@ -133,9 +143,9 @@ static u64 mlxsw_sp1_ptp_ns2cycles(const struct timecounter *tc, u64 nsec)
}
static int
-mlxsw_sp1_ptp_phc_settime(struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock *clock, u64 nsec)
+mlxsw_sp1_ptp_phc_settime(struct mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock *clock, u64 nsec)
{
- struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core = clock->core;
+ struct mlxsw_core *mlxsw_core = clock->common.core;
u64 next_sec, next_sec_in_nsec, cycles;
char mtutc_pl[MLXSW_REG_MTUTC_LEN];
char mtpps_pl[MLXSW_REG_MTPPS_LEN];
@@ -161,8 +171,7 @@ mlxsw_sp1_ptp_phc_settime(struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock *clock, u64 nsec)
static int mlxsw_sp1_ptp_adjfine(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, long scaled_ppm)
{
- struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock *clock =
- container_of(ptp, struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock, ptp_info);
+ struct mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock *clock = mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock(ptp);
int neg_adj = 0;
u32 diff;
u64 adj;
@@ -185,13 +194,12 @@ static int mlxsw_sp1_ptp_adjfine(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, long scaled_ppm)
clock->nominal_c_mult + diff;
spin_unlock_bh(&clock->lock);
- return mlxsw_sp1_ptp_phc_adjfreq(clock, neg_adj ? -ppb : ppb);
+ return mlxsw_sp1_ptp_phc_adjfreq(&clock->common, neg_adj ? -ppb : ppb);
}
static int mlxsw_sp1_ptp_adjtime(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp, s64 delta)
{
- struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock *clock =
- container_of(ptp, struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock, ptp_info);
+ struct mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock *clock = mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock(ptp);
u64 nsec;
spin_lock_bh(&clock->lock);
@@ -206,8 +214,7 @@ static int mlxsw_sp1_ptp_gettimex(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp,
struct timespec64 *ts,
struct ptp_system_timestamp *sts)
{
- struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock *clock =
- container_of(ptp, struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock, ptp_info);
+ struct mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock *clock = mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock(ptp);
u64 cycles, nsec;
spin_lock_bh(&clock->lock);
@@ -223,8 +230,7 @@ static int mlxsw_sp1_ptp_gettimex(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp,
static int mlxsw_sp1_ptp_settime(struct ptp_clock_info *ptp,
const struct timespec64 *ts)
{
- struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock *clock =
- container_of(ptp, struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock, ptp_info);
+ struct mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock *clock = mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock(ptp);
u64 nsec = timespec64_to_ns(ts);
spin_lock_bh(&clock->lock);
@@ -248,9 +254,9 @@ static const struct ptp_clock_info mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock_info = {
static void mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock_overflow(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct delayed_work *dwork = to_delayed_work(work);
- struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock *clock;
+ struct mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock *clock;
- clock = container_of(dwork, struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock, overflow_work);
+ clock = container_of(dwork, struct mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock, overflow_work);
spin_lock_bh(&clock->lock);
timecounter_read(&clock->tc);
@@ -262,7 +268,7 @@ struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock *
mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock_init(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, struct device *dev)
{
u64 overflow_cycles, nsec, frac = 0;
- struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock *clock;
+ struct mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock *clock;
int err;
clock = kzalloc(sizeof(*clock), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -276,7 +282,7 @@ mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock_init(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, struct device *dev)
clock->cycles.shift);
clock->nominal_c_mult = clock->cycles.mult;
clock->cycles.mask = CLOCKSOURCE_MASK(MLXSW_SP1_PTP_CLOCK_MASK);
- clock->core = mlxsw_sp->core;
+ clock->common.core = mlxsw_sp->core;
timecounter_init(&clock->tc, &clock->cycles, 0);
@@ -296,15 +302,15 @@ mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock_init(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, struct device *dev)
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&clock->overflow_work, mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock_overflow);
mlxsw_core_schedule_dw(&clock->overflow_work, 0);
- clock->ptp_info = mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock_info;
- clock->ptp = ptp_clock_register(&clock->ptp_info, dev);
- if (IS_ERR(clock->ptp)) {
- err = PTR_ERR(clock->ptp);
+ clock->common.ptp_info = mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock_info;
+ clock->common.ptp = ptp_clock_register(&clock->common.ptp_info, dev);
+ if (IS_ERR(clock->common.ptp)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(clock->common.ptp);
dev_err(dev, "ptp_clock_register failed %d\n", err);
goto err_ptp_clock_register;
}
- return clock;
+ return &clock->common;
err_ptp_clock_register:
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&clock->overflow_work);
@@ -312,9 +318,12 @@ mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock_init(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, struct device *dev)
return ERR_PTR(err);
}
-void mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock_fini(struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock *clock)
+void mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock_fini(struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock *clock_common)
{
- ptp_clock_unregister(clock->ptp);
+ struct mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock *clock =
+ container_of(clock_common, struct mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock, common);
+
+ ptp_clock_unregister(clock_common->ptp);
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&clock->overflow_work);
kfree(clock);
}
@@ -451,12 +460,16 @@ static void mlxsw_sp1_packet_timestamp(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp,
struct sk_buff *skb,
u64 timestamp)
{
+ struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_clock *clock_common = mlxsw_sp->clock;
+ struct mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock *clock =
+ container_of(clock_common, struct mlxsw_sp1_ptp_clock, common);
+
struct skb_shared_hwtstamps hwtstamps;
u64 nsec;
- spin_lock_bh(&mlxsw_sp->clock->lock);
- nsec = timecounter_cyc2time(&mlxsw_sp->clock->tc, timestamp);
- spin_unlock_bh(&mlxsw_sp->clock->lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&clock->lock);
+ nsec = timecounter_cyc2time(&clock->tc, timestamp);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&clock->lock);
hwtstamps.hwtstamp = ns_to_ktime(nsec);
mlxsw_sp1_ptp_packet_finish(mlxsw_sp, skb,
--
2.36.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-24 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-24 8:03 [PATCH net-next 00/15] mlxsw: Spectrum-2 PTP preparations Ido Schimmel
2022-07-24 8:03 ` [PATCH net-next 01/15] mlxsw: Rename mlxsw_reg_mtptptp_pack() to mlxsw_reg_mtptpt_pack() Ido Schimmel
2022-07-24 8:03 ` [PATCH net-next 02/15] mlxsw: reg: Add MTUTC register's fields for supporting PTP in Spectrum-2 Ido Schimmel
2022-07-24 8:03 ` [PATCH net-next 03/15] mlxsw: reg: Add Monitoring Time Precision Correction Port Configuration Register Ido Schimmel
2022-07-24 8:03 ` [PATCH net-next 04/15] mlxsw: pci_hw: Add 'time_stamp' and 'time_stamp_type' fields to CQEv2 Ido Schimmel
2022-07-24 8:03 ` [PATCH net-next 05/15] mlxsw: cmd: Add UTC related fields to query firmware command Ido Schimmel
2022-07-24 8:03 ` [PATCH net-next 06/15] mlxsw: Set time stamp type as part of config profile Ido Schimmel
2022-07-24 8:03 ` [PATCH net-next 07/15] mlxsw: spectrum: Fix the shift of FID field in TX header Ido Schimmel
2022-07-24 8:03 ` [PATCH net-next 08/15] mlxsw: resources: Add resource identifier for maximum number of FIDs Ido Schimmel
2022-07-24 8:03 ` [PATCH net-next 09/15] mlxsw: Rename 'read_frc_capable' bit to 'read_clock_capable' Ido Schimmel
2022-07-24 8:03 ` [PATCH net-next 10/15] mlxsw: spectrum_ptp: Initialize the clock to zero as part of initialization Ido Schimmel
2022-07-24 22:14 ` Richard Cochran
2022-07-24 8:03 ` [PATCH net-next 11/15] mlxsw: pci: Simplify FRC clock reading Ido Schimmel
2022-07-24 8:03 ` [PATCH net-next 12/15] mlxsw: spectrum_ptp: Use 'struct mlxsw_sp_ptp_state' per ASIC Ido Schimmel
2022-07-24 8:03 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2022-07-24 8:03 ` [PATCH net-next 14/15] mlxsw: spectrum_ptp: Rename mlxsw_sp_ptp_get_message_types() Ido Schimmel
2022-07-24 8:03 ` [PATCH net-next 15/15] mlxsw: spectrum_ptp: Rename mlxsw_sp1_ptp_phc_adjfreq() Ido Schimmel
2022-07-25 13:10 ` [PATCH net-next 00/15] mlxsw: Spectrum-2 PTP preparations patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220724080329.2613617-14-idosch@nvidia.com \
--to=idosch@nvidia.com \
--cc=amcohen@nvidia.com \
--cc=danieller@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=mlxsw@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=petrm@nvidia.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).