netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
Cc: ecree@xilinx.com, davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com,
	linux-net-drivers@amd.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 12/14] sfc: set EF100 VF MAC address through representor
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 18:45:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220728184527.3f3dd520@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a4d22f2-e315-b6f4-5fb5-31134960c430@gmail.com>

On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 21:23:23 +0100 Edward Cree wrote:
> Sadly I was too busy with EF100 bring-up, and naïvely assumed that I
>  could safely ignore devlink port stuff as it was so obviously going
>  to be a classic Mellanox design: tasteless, overweight, and not
>  cleanly mappable onto any other vendor.  Which seems to have been
>  true but they've managed to make it the standard anyway by virtue
>  of being there first, as usual :'(
> (Yeah, I probably shouldn't publicly say things like that about
>  another vendor's devs.  But I'm getting frustrated at this recurring
>  pattern.)

I spend an unhealthy amount of time thinking about the problem 
of vendors not paying attention when new uAPIs are forged.
Happy to try things.

> Devlink port function *would* be useful for administering functions
>  that don't have a representor.  I just can't see any good reason
>  why such things should ever exist.

The SmartNIC/DPU/IPU/isolated hv+IO CPU can expose storage functions
to the peer. nVidia is working on extending the devlink rate limit API
to cover such cases.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-29  1:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-27 17:45 [PATCH net-next v2 00/14] sfc: VF representors for EF100 - RX side ecree
2022-07-27 17:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/14] sfc: plumb ef100 representor stats ecree
2022-07-27 17:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/14] sfc: ef100 representor RX NAPI poll ecree
2022-07-27 17:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/14] sfc: ef100 representor RX top half ecree
2022-07-27 17:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/14] sfc: determine wire m-port at EF100 PF probe time ecree
2022-07-27 17:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/14] sfc: check ef100 RX packets are from the wire ecree
2022-07-27 17:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/14] sfc: receive packets from EF100 VFs into representors ecree
2022-07-27 17:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/14] sfc: insert default MAE rules to connect VFs to representors ecree
2022-07-27 17:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/14] sfc: move table locking into filter_table_{probe,remove} methods ecree
2022-07-27 17:45 ` [PATCH net-next v2 09/14] sfc: use a dynamic m-port for representor RX and set it promisc ecree
2022-07-27 17:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/14] sfc: look up VF's client ID when creating representor ecree
2022-07-27 17:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/14] sfc: fetch existing assigned MAC address from FW when creating VF rep ecree
2022-07-27 17:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 12/14] sfc: set EF100 VF MAC address through representor ecree
2022-07-28  3:10   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-28 15:47     ` Edward Cree
2022-07-28 16:20       ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-28 18:12         ` Edward Cree
2022-07-28 18:32           ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-28 18:54             ` Edward Cree
2022-07-28 19:27               ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-28 20:23                 ` Edward Cree
2022-07-29  1:45                   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-07-29 15:17                     ` Edward Cree
2022-07-27 17:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 13/14] sfc: get provisioned MAC address on EF100 VF probe ecree
2022-07-27 17:46 ` [PATCH net-next v2 14/14] sfc: implement ethtool get/set RX ring size for EF100 reps ecree

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220728184527.3f3dd520@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
    --cc=ecree@xilinx.com \
    --cc=linux-net-drivers@amd.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).