From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1 1/1] net: dsa: microchip: KSZ9893: do not write to not supported Output Clock Control Register
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 18:32:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220729163220.GE10850@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220729084149.5a061772@kernel.org>
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 08:41:49AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jul 2022 11:48:40 +0200 Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 10:23:16PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:18:52 +0200 Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > > KSZ9893 compatible chips do not have "Output Clock Control Register 0x0103".
> > > > So, avoid writing to it.
> > >
> > > Respin will be needed regardless of the answer to Andrew - patch does
> > > not apply.
> >
> > Hm, this driver was hardly refactored in net-next. I'll better send it
> > against net-next otherwise things will break.
>
> Probably fine either way, with the net-next patch (i.e. this patch)
> on the list we shouldn't have problems resolving the conflict correctly.
>
> The real question is whether it's okay for 5.19 to not have this patch.
> It'd be good to have the user-visible impact specified in the commit
> message.
So far I'm not aware about issues related to this, only warning in the data
sheet:
"RESERVED address space must not be written under any circumstances. Failure
to heed this warning may result in untoward operation and unexpected results."
I have send this patch as part of register access validation patch set.
There are move fixes any way.
Regards,
Oleksij
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-29 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-28 13:18 [PATCH net v1 1/1] net: dsa: microchip: KSZ9893: do not write to not supported Output Clock Control Register Oleksij Rempel
2022-07-28 13:34 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-07-29 5:23 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-29 9:48 ` Oleksij Rempel
2022-07-29 15:41 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-07-29 16:32 ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220729163220.GE10850@pengutronix.de \
--to=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
--cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).