From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@nvidia.com>
Cc: "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>, Gal Pressman <gal@nvidia.com>,
"john.fastabend@gmail.com" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
Boris Pismenny <borisp@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net/tls: Use RCU API to access tls_ctx->netdev
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 08:37:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220802083731.22291c3b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <380eb27278e581012524cdc16f99e1872cee9be0.camel@nvidia.com>
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 12:03:32 +0000 Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
> > For cases like this where we don't actually hold onto the object, just
> > take a peek at the address of it we can save a handful of LoC by using
> > rcu_access_pointer().
>
> The documentation of rcu_access_pointer says it shouldn't be used on
> the update side, because we lose lockdep protection:
>
> --cut--
>
> Although rcu_access_pointer() may also be used in cases
> where update-side locks prevent the value of the pointer from changing,
> you should instead use rcu_dereference_protected() for this use case.
I think what this is trying to say is to not use the
rcu_access_pointer() as a hack against lockdep:
lock(writer_lock);
/* no need for rcu_dereference() because we have writer lock */
ptr = rcu_access_pointer(obj->ptr);
ptr->something = 1;
unlock(writer_lock);
It's still perfectly fine to use access_pointer as intended on
the write side, which is just checking the value of the pointer,
not deferencing it:
lock(writer_lock);
if (rcu_access_pointer(obj->ptr) == target)
so_something(obj);
unlock(writer_lock);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-02 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-01 8:00 [PATCH net-next] net/tls: Use RCU API to access tls_ctx->netdev Maxim Mikityanskiy
2022-08-01 19:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-02 12:03 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2022-08-02 15:37 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-08-03 9:33 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2022-08-03 14:49 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-03 16:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-04 8:08 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2022-08-04 16:18 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-05 10:59 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2022-08-04 18:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-08-05 10:59 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2022-08-01 19:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-02 12:07 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2022-08-02 15:38 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-02 16:26 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220802083731.22291c3b@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=borisp@nvidia.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gal@nvidia.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=maximmi@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=saeedm@nvidia.com \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).