From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4931C3F6B0 for ; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 19:42:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235816AbiHKTmu (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2022 15:42:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53658 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234698AbiHKTmt (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Aug 2022 15:42:49 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 518D523BF5; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 12:42:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15B8BB8200A; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 19:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 64B02C433D6; Thu, 11 Aug 2022 19:42:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1660246965; bh=/Z5JO62QRcw9PN+qiv1je4iFkrsxHarqJZOZ+PuLgI8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=PjRMAWierwHCQj5xoYTF3u0AKmy9efK/2iDjcK1Qd0CYhfSgHLy2KM6iO88hBCaBt dQ330fPz46AM/DEiUoyueFwdUXbpZTQ4WuVGOCNQKc5sApBQU0DKl72ErHndGO+p4t c4BUHZVR0ZnFqJ9vtXYV4n6lnjzBtcLurGWTrS+dZcWwilkCcYX/M407uTO7c1RlJy Bj4PPvdmRuFTIJ4Sz6V1D0/VKkhblfZKeY1ePW6lS7DgimIkYdkcW+1TbF4E+YB7ix rtVEPzKfV8rDoHBv3nTkOlJOl9AC9y6vBfY742AecMoaNo65tZ5ilwLiHv/8MUK+r4 02c4TcHcny7rA== Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 12:42:44 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: sdf@google.com Cc: Stephen Hemminger , netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com, vadfed@fb.com, johannes@sipsolutions.net, jiri@resnulli.us, dsahern@kernel.org, fw@strlen.de, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Michal Kubecek Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/4] ynl: YAML netlink protocol descriptions Message-ID: <20220811124244.37a66b98@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20220811022304.583300-1-kuba@kernel.org> <20220810211534.0e529a06@hermes.local> <20220810214701.46565016@kernel.org> <20220811080152.2dbd82c2@hermes.local> <20220811083435.1b271c7f@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 09:28:45 -0700 sdf@google.com wrote: > Putting it into iproute2 will make it carry a 'networking' badge on it > meaning no other subsystem would look into it. Good point. > I'd rather make netlink more generic (s/netlink/kernelink/?) and remove > CONFIG_NET dependency to address https://lwn.net/Articles/897202/ I think people just use that as an excuse, TBH.