From: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Woojung Huh <woojung.huh@microchip.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 07/10] net: dsa: microchip: warn about not supported synclko properties on KSZ9893 chips
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2022 06:26:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220814042608.GC12534@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YvgMnfSkEeD8jwIG@lunn.ch>
Ccing Rob Herring.
On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 10:42:05PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 06:18:50PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 05:11:45PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 04:32:15PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 04:42:34PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 01:56:01PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > > > > Hm, if we will have any random not support OF property in the switch
> > > > > > node. We won't be able to warn about it anyway. So, if it is present
> > > > > > but not supported, we will just ignore it.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'll drop this patch.
> > > > >
> > > > > To continue, I think the right way to go about this is to edit the
> > > > > dt-schema to say that these properties are only applicable to certain
> > > > > compatible strings, rather than for all. Then due to the
> > > > > "unevaluatedProperties: false", you'd get the warnings you want, at
> > > > > validation time.
> > > >
> > > > Hm, with "unevaluatedProperties: false" i have no warnings. Even if I
> > > > create examples with random strings as properties. Are there some new
> > > > json libraries i should use?
> > >
> > > Try
> > >
> > > additionalProperties: False
> >
> > Yes, it works. But in this case I'll do more changes. Just wont to make
> > sure I do not fix not broken things.
>
> I've been working on converting some old SoCs bindings from .txt to
> .yaml. My observations is that the yaml is sometimes more restrictive
> than what the drivers actually imposes. So you might need to change
> perfectly working .dts files to get it warning free. Or you just
> accept the warnings and move on. At lot will depend on the number of
> warnings and how easy it is to see real problems mixed in with
> warnings you never intend to fix.
Heh :) Currently with "unevaluatedProperties: false" restrictions do not
work at all. At least for me. For example with this change I have no
warnings:
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/nxp,sja1105.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/nxp,sja1105.yaml
index 1e26d876d1463..da38ad98a152f 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/nxp,sja1105.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/nxp,sja1105.yaml
@@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ examples:
ethernet-switch@1 {
reg = <0x1>;
compatible = "nxp,sja1105t";
+ something-random-here;
ethernet-ports {
#address-cells = <1>;
make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/nxp,sja1105.yaml
So the main question is, is it broken for all or just for me? If it is
just me, what i'm doing wrong?
Regards,
Oleksij
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-14 4:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-29 13:03 [PATCH net-next v1 00/10] net: dsa: microchip: add error handling and register access validation Oleksij Rempel
2022-07-29 13:03 ` [PATCH net-next v1 01/10] net: dsa: microchip: don't announce extended register support on non Gbit chips Oleksij Rempel
2022-07-29 13:03 ` [PATCH net-next v1 02/10] net: dsa: microchip: allow to pass return values for PHY read/write accesses Oleksij Rempel
2022-08-02 11:19 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-29 13:03 ` [PATCH net-next v1 03/10] net: dsa: microchip: forward error value on all ksz_pread/ksz_pwrite functions Oleksij Rempel
2022-08-02 11:19 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-29 13:03 ` [PATCH net-next v1 04/10] net: dsa: microchip: ksz9477: add error handling to ksz9477_r/w_phy Oleksij Rempel
2022-08-02 11:24 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-29 13:03 ` [PATCH net-next v1 05/10] net: dsa: microchip: ksz8795: add error handling to ksz8_r/w_phy Oleksij Rempel
2022-08-02 11:29 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-29 13:03 ` [PATCH net-next v1 06/10] net: dsa: microchip: KSZ9893: do not write to not supported Output Clock Control Register Oleksij Rempel
2022-07-29 13:03 ` [PATCH net-next v1 07/10] net: dsa: microchip: warn about not supported synclko properties on KSZ9893 chips Oleksij Rempel
2022-08-02 11:36 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-08-05 11:56 ` Oleksij Rempel
2022-08-05 13:42 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-08-13 14:32 ` Oleksij Rempel
2022-08-13 15:11 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-08-13 16:18 ` Oleksij Rempel
2022-08-13 20:42 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-08-14 4:26 ` Oleksij Rempel [this message]
2022-08-14 8:04 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-07-29 13:03 ` [PATCH net-next v1 08/10] net: dsa: microchip: add support for regmap_access_tables Oleksij Rempel
2022-07-29 13:03 ` [PATCH net-next v1 09/10] net: dsa: microchip: add regmap_range for KSZ8563 chip Oleksij Rempel
2022-08-01 5:11 ` Oleksij Rempel
2022-07-29 13:03 ` [PATCH net-next v1 10/10] net: dsa: microchip: ksz9477: remove MII_CTRL1000 check from ksz9477_w_phy() Oleksij Rempel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220814042608.GC12534@pengutronix.de \
--to=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
--cc=woojung.huh@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).