netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	Peilin Ye <peilin.ye@bytedance.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 0/5] net: Qdisc backpressure infrastructure
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2022 09:17:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220822091737.4b870dbb@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1661158173.git.peilin.ye@bytedance.com>

On Mon, 22 Aug 2022 02:10:17 -0700 Peilin Ye wrote:
> Currently sockets (especially UDP ones) can drop a lot of packets at TC
> egress when rate limited by shaper Qdiscs like HTB.  This patchset series
> tries to solve this by introducing a Qdisc backpressure mechanism.
> 
> RFC v1 [1] used a throttle & unthrottle approach, which introduced several
> issues, including a thundering herd problem and a socket reference count
> issue [2].  This RFC v2 uses a different approach to avoid those issues:
> 
>   1. When a shaper Qdisc drops a packet that belongs to a local socket due
>      to TC egress congestion, we make part of the socket's sndbuf
>      temporarily unavailable, so it sends slower.
>   
>   2. Later, when TC egress becomes idle again, we gradually recover the
>      socket's sndbuf back to normal.  Patch 2 implements this step using a
>      timer for UDP sockets.
> 
> The thundering herd problem is avoided, since we no longer wake up all
> throttled sockets at the same time in qdisc_watchdog().  The socket
> reference count issue is also avoided, since we no longer maintain socket
> list on Qdisc.
> 
> Performance is better than RFC v1.  There is one concern about fairness
> between flows for TBF Qdisc, which could be solved by using a SFQ inner
> Qdisc.
> 
> Please see the individual patches for details and numbers.  Any comments,
> suggestions would be much appreciated.  Thanks!
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/cover.1651800598.git.peilin.ye@bytedance.com/
> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20220506133111.1d4bebf3@hermes.local/

Similarly to Eric's comments on v1 I'm not seeing the clear motivation
here. Modern high speed UDP users will have a CC in user space, back
off and set transmission time on the packets. Could you describe your
_actual_ use case / application in more detail?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-22 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-06 19:43 [PATCH RFC v1 net-next 0/4] net: Qdisc backpressure infrastructure Peilin Ye
2022-05-06 19:44 ` [PATCH RFC v1 net-next 1/4] net: Introduce " Peilin Ye
2022-05-06 20:31   ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-05-06 23:34     ` Peilin Ye
2022-05-09  7:53   ` Dave Taht
2022-05-10  2:23     ` Peilin Ye
2022-05-06 19:44 ` [PATCH RFC v1 net-next 2/4] net/sched: sch_tbf: Use " Peilin Ye
2022-05-06 19:45 ` [PATCH RFC v1 net-next 3/4] net/sched: sch_htb: " Peilin Ye
2022-05-06 19:45 ` [PATCH RFC v1 net-next 4/4] net/sched: sch_cbq: " Peilin Ye
2022-05-10  3:26 ` [PATCH RFC v1 net-next 0/4] net: " Eric Dumazet
2022-05-10 23:03   ` Peilin Ye
2022-05-10 23:27     ` Peilin Ye
2022-08-22  9:10 ` [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 0/5] " Peilin Ye
2022-08-22  9:11   ` [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 1/5] net: Introduce " Peilin Ye
2022-08-22  9:12   ` [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 2/5] net/udp: Implement Qdisc backpressure algorithm Peilin Ye
2022-08-22  9:12   ` [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 3/5] net/sched: sch_tbf: Use Qdisc backpressure infrastructure Peilin Ye
2022-08-22  9:12   ` [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 4/5] net/sched: sch_htb: " Peilin Ye
2022-08-22  9:12   ` [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 5/5] net/sched: sch_cbq: " Peilin Ye
2022-08-22 16:17   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-08-29 16:53     ` [PATCH RFC v2 net-next 0/5] net: " Cong Wang
2022-08-30  0:21       ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-19 17:00         ` Cong Wang
2022-08-22 16:22   ` Eric Dumazet
2022-08-29 16:47     ` Cong Wang
2022-08-29 16:53       ` Eric Dumazet
2022-09-19 17:06         ` Cong Wang
2022-08-30  2:28     ` Yafang Shao
2022-09-19 17:04       ` Cong Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220822091737.4b870dbb@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=peilin.ye@bytedance.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=yepeilin.cs@gmail.com \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).