From: Ismael Luceno <iluceno@suse.de>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Subject: Re: Netlink NLM_F_DUMP_INTR flag lost
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 12:59:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220824125901.21a28927@pirotess> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b0246015-7fe6-7f30-c5ae-5531c126366f@gmail.com>
On 17/Jun/2022 10:28, David Ahern wrote:
> On 6/17/22 9:22 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
<...>
> > FWIW what I think is strange is that we record the gen id before the
> > dump and then check if the recorded version was old. Like.. what's
> > the point of that? Nothing updates cb->seq while dumping AFAICS, so
> > the code is functionally equivalent to this right?
<...>
> FWIW, net/ipv4/nexthop.c sets cb->seq at the end of the loop and the
> nl_dump_check_consistent follows that.
[CCing Florian Westphal because he gave a related talk at netdev 2.2,
maybe he can add something]
It seems to me now that most of the calls to nl_dump_check_consistent
are redundant.
Either the rtnl lock is explicitly taken:
- ethnl_tunnel_info_dumpit
Or are implicitly called with the rtnl lock held:
- rtnl_dump_ifinfo
- rtnl_dump_all
- in_dev_dump_addr
- inet_netconf_dump_devconf
- rtm_dump_nexthop
- rtm_dump_nexthop_bucket
- mpls_netconf_dump_devconf
Except:
- inet6_netconf_dump_devconf
- inet6_dump_addr
I assume the ones that rely on rcu_read_lock are safe too.
Also, the following ones set cb->seq just before calling it:
- rtm_dump_nh_ctx
- rtm_dump_res_bucket_ctx
Does it make sense to remove these calls or is anyone looking forward
to convert the functions to run without the rtnl lock?
Am I missing something here?
--
Ismael Luceno
SUSE - Support Level 3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-24 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220615171113.7d93af3e@pirotess>
2022-06-15 16:00 ` Netlink NLM_F_DUMP_INTR flag lost Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-16 15:10 ` Ismael Luceno
2022-06-17 0:16 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-17 13:01 ` Ismael Luceno
2022-06-17 14:55 ` David Ahern
2022-06-17 15:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-17 16:17 ` David Ahern
2022-06-17 16:28 ` David Ahern
2022-08-24 10:59 ` Ismael Luceno [this message]
2022-08-24 11:46 ` Florian Westphal
2022-06-22 11:12 ` Ismael Luceno
2022-06-22 23:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-23 4:01 ` David Ahern
2022-06-23 16:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-23 16:17 ` David Ahern
2022-06-23 16:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-23 17:31 ` David Ahern
2022-06-23 19:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-06-28 19:38 ` Ismael Luceno
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220824125901.21a28927@pirotess \
--to=iluceno@suse.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).