netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>,
	Joe Stringer <joe@cilium.io>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v9 03/23] selftests/bpf: add test for accessing ctx from syscall program type
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 15:40:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220824134055.1328882-4-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220824134055.1328882-1-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>

We need to also export the kfunc set to the syscall program type,
and then add a couple of eBPF programs that are testing those calls.

The first one checks for valid access, and the second one is OK
from a static analysis point of view but fails at run time because
we are trying to access outside of the allocated memory.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>

---

no changes in v9

no changes in v8

changes in v7:
- add 1 more case to ensure we can read the entire sizeof(ctx)
- add a test case for when the context is NULL

new in v6
---
 net/bpf/test_run.c                            |  1 +
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c     | 28 +++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c     | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 65 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index 25d8ecf105aa..f16baf977a21 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -1634,6 +1634,7 @@ static int __init bpf_prog_test_run_init(void)
 
 	ret = register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &bpf_prog_test_kfunc_set);
 	ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, &bpf_prog_test_kfunc_set);
+	ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL, &bpf_prog_test_kfunc_set);
 	return ret ?: register_btf_id_dtor_kfuncs(bpf_prog_test_dtor_kfunc,
 						  ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_prog_test_dtor_kfunc),
 						  THIS_MODULE);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
index eede7c304f86..1edad012fe01 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
@@ -9,10 +9,22 @@
 
 #include "cap_helpers.h"
 
+struct syscall_test_args {
+	__u8 data[16];
+	size_t size;
+};
+
 static void test_main(void)
 {
 	struct kfunc_call_test_lskel *skel;
 	int prog_fd, err;
+	struct syscall_test_args args = {
+		.size = 10,
+	};
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, syscall_topts,
+		.ctx_in = &args,
+		.ctx_size_in = sizeof(args),
+	);
 	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
 		.data_in = &pkt_v4,
 		.data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4),
@@ -38,6 +50,22 @@ static void test_main(void)
 	ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run(test_ref_btf_id)");
 	ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "test_ref_btf_id-retval");
 
+	prog_fd = skel->progs.kfunc_syscall_test.prog_fd;
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &syscall_topts);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run(syscall_test)");
+
+	prog_fd = skel->progs.kfunc_syscall_test_fail.prog_fd;
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &syscall_topts);
+	ASSERT_ERR(err, "bpf_prog_test_run(syscall_test_fail)");
+
+	syscall_topts.ctx_in = NULL;
+	syscall_topts.ctx_size_in = 0;
+
+	prog_fd = skel->progs.kfunc_syscall_test_null.prog_fd;
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &syscall_topts);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run(syscall_test_null)");
+	ASSERT_EQ(syscall_topts.retval, 0, "syscall_test_null-retval");
+
 	kfunc_call_test_lskel__destroy(skel);
 }
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c
index 5aecbb9fdc68..da7ae0ef9100 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c
@@ -92,4 +92,40 @@ int kfunc_call_test_pass(struct __sk_buff *skb)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+struct syscall_test_args {
+	__u8 data[16];
+	size_t size;
+};
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int kfunc_syscall_test(struct syscall_test_args *args)
+{
+	const int size = args->size;
+
+	if (size > sizeof(args->data))
+		return -7; /* -E2BIG */
+
+	bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(&args->data, sizeof(args->data));
+	bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(&args->data, sizeof(*args));
+	bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(&args->data, size);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int kfunc_syscall_test_null(struct syscall_test_args *args)
+{
+	bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(args, 0);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int kfunc_syscall_test_fail(struct syscall_test_args *args)
+{
+	bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(&args->data, sizeof(*args) + 1);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.36.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-24 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-24 13:40 [PATCH bpf-next v9 00/23] Introduce eBPF support for HID devices Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 01/23] bpf/verifier: allow all functions to read user provided context Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-26  1:41   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-08-26  1:50     ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-08-30 14:29       ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-31 16:37         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-08-31 17:56           ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-09-01  4:15             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-01 16:47               ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-09-02  3:50                 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-09-02 13:11                   ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 02/23] bpf/verifier: do not clear meta in check_mem_size Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-26  1:54   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-08-30 13:51     ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` Benjamin Tissoires [this message]
2022-08-26  2:07   ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 03/23] selftests/bpf: add test for accessing ctx from syscall program type Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 04/23] bpf/verifier: allow kfunc to return an allocated mem Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-26  1:24   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-08-31  5:50     ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-31 11:06       ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 05/23] selftests/bpf: Add tests for kfunc returning a memory pointer Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-26  2:26   ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 06/23] bpf: prepare for more bpf syscall to be used from kernel and user space Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 07/23] libbpf: add map_get_fd_by_id and map_delete_elem in light skeleton Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 08/23] HID: core: store the unique system identifier in hid_device Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 09/23] HID: export hid_report_type to uapi Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 10/23] HID: convert defines of HID class requests into a proper enum Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 11/23] HID: Kconfig: split HID support and hid-core compilation Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 12/23] HID: initial BPF implementation Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 13/23] selftests/bpf: add tests for the HID-bpf initial implementation Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 14/23] HID: bpf: allocate data memory for device_event BPF programs Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 15/23] selftests/bpf/hid: add test to change the report size Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 16/23] HID: bpf: introduce hid_hw_request() Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 17/23] selftests/bpf: add tests for bpf_hid_hw_request Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 18/23] HID: bpf: allow to change the report descriptor Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 19/23] selftests/bpf: add report descriptor fixup tests Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 20/23] selftests/bpf: Add a test for BPF_F_INSERT_HEAD Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 21/23] samples/bpf: add new hid_mouse example Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 19:30   ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 21/23] samples/bpf: HID: " Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 22/23] HID: bpf: add Surface Dial example Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 22/23] samples/bpf: HID: " Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 23/23] Documentation: add HID-BPF docs Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-26  2:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 00/23] Introduce eBPF support for HID devices patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220824134055.1328882-4-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
    --to=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davemarchevsky@fb.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=joe@cilium.io \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=tero.kristo@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).