From: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>,
Joe Stringer <joe@cilium.io>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v9 03/23] selftests/bpf: add test for accessing ctx from syscall program type
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 15:40:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220824134055.1328882-4-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220824134055.1328882-1-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
We need to also export the kfunc set to the syscall program type,
and then add a couple of eBPF programs that are testing those calls.
The first one checks for valid access, and the second one is OK
from a static analysis point of view but fails at run time because
we are trying to access outside of the allocated memory.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
---
no changes in v9
no changes in v8
changes in v7:
- add 1 more case to ensure we can read the entire sizeof(ctx)
- add a test case for when the context is NULL
new in v6
---
net/bpf/test_run.c | 1 +
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c | 28 +++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 65 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index 25d8ecf105aa..f16baf977a21 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -1634,6 +1634,7 @@ static int __init bpf_prog_test_run_init(void)
ret = register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &bpf_prog_test_kfunc_set);
ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, &bpf_prog_test_kfunc_set);
+ ret = ret ?: register_btf_kfunc_id_set(BPF_PROG_TYPE_SYSCALL, &bpf_prog_test_kfunc_set);
return ret ?: register_btf_id_dtor_kfuncs(bpf_prog_test_dtor_kfunc,
ARRAY_SIZE(bpf_prog_test_dtor_kfunc),
THIS_MODULE);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
index eede7c304f86..1edad012fe01 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/kfunc_call.c
@@ -9,10 +9,22 @@
#include "cap_helpers.h"
+struct syscall_test_args {
+ __u8 data[16];
+ size_t size;
+};
+
static void test_main(void)
{
struct kfunc_call_test_lskel *skel;
int prog_fd, err;
+ struct syscall_test_args args = {
+ .size = 10,
+ };
+ DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, syscall_topts,
+ .ctx_in = &args,
+ .ctx_size_in = sizeof(args),
+ );
LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
.data_in = &pkt_v4,
.data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4),
@@ -38,6 +50,22 @@ static void test_main(void)
ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run(test_ref_btf_id)");
ASSERT_EQ(topts.retval, 0, "test_ref_btf_id-retval");
+ prog_fd = skel->progs.kfunc_syscall_test.prog_fd;
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &syscall_topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run(syscall_test)");
+
+ prog_fd = skel->progs.kfunc_syscall_test_fail.prog_fd;
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &syscall_topts);
+ ASSERT_ERR(err, "bpf_prog_test_run(syscall_test_fail)");
+
+ syscall_topts.ctx_in = NULL;
+ syscall_topts.ctx_size_in = 0;
+
+ prog_fd = skel->progs.kfunc_syscall_test_null.prog_fd;
+ err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &syscall_topts);
+ ASSERT_OK(err, "bpf_prog_test_run(syscall_test_null)");
+ ASSERT_EQ(syscall_topts.retval, 0, "syscall_test_null-retval");
+
kfunc_call_test_lskel__destroy(skel);
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c
index 5aecbb9fdc68..da7ae0ef9100 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/kfunc_call_test.c
@@ -92,4 +92,40 @@ int kfunc_call_test_pass(struct __sk_buff *skb)
return 0;
}
+struct syscall_test_args {
+ __u8 data[16];
+ size_t size;
+};
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int kfunc_syscall_test(struct syscall_test_args *args)
+{
+ const int size = args->size;
+
+ if (size > sizeof(args->data))
+ return -7; /* -E2BIG */
+
+ bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(&args->data, sizeof(args->data));
+ bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(&args->data, sizeof(*args));
+ bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(&args->data, size);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int kfunc_syscall_test_null(struct syscall_test_args *args)
+{
+ bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(args, 0);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+SEC("syscall")
+int kfunc_syscall_test_fail(struct syscall_test_args *args)
+{
+ bpf_kfunc_call_test_mem_len_pass1(&args->data, sizeof(*args) + 1);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
--
2.36.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-24 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-24 13:40 [PATCH bpf-next v9 00/23] Introduce eBPF support for HID devices Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 01/23] bpf/verifier: allow all functions to read user provided context Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-26 1:41 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-08-26 1:50 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-08-30 14:29 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-31 16:37 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-08-31 17:56 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-09-01 4:15 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-09-01 16:47 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-09-02 3:50 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-09-02 13:11 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 02/23] bpf/verifier: do not clear meta in check_mem_size Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-26 1:54 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-08-30 13:51 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` Benjamin Tissoires [this message]
2022-08-26 2:07 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 03/23] selftests/bpf: add test for accessing ctx from syscall program type Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 04/23] bpf/verifier: allow kfunc to return an allocated mem Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-26 1:24 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-08-31 5:50 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-31 11:06 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 05/23] selftests/bpf: Add tests for kfunc returning a memory pointer Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-26 2:26 ` Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 06/23] bpf: prepare for more bpf syscall to be used from kernel and user space Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 07/23] libbpf: add map_get_fd_by_id and map_delete_elem in light skeleton Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 08/23] HID: core: store the unique system identifier in hid_device Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 09/23] HID: export hid_report_type to uapi Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 10/23] HID: convert defines of HID class requests into a proper enum Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 11/23] HID: Kconfig: split HID support and hid-core compilation Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 12/23] HID: initial BPF implementation Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 13/23] selftests/bpf: add tests for the HID-bpf initial implementation Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 14/23] HID: bpf: allocate data memory for device_event BPF programs Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 15/23] selftests/bpf/hid: add test to change the report size Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 16/23] HID: bpf: introduce hid_hw_request() Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 17/23] selftests/bpf: add tests for bpf_hid_hw_request Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 18/23] HID: bpf: allow to change the report descriptor Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 19/23] selftests/bpf: add report descriptor fixup tests Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 20/23] selftests/bpf: Add a test for BPF_F_INSERT_HEAD Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 21/23] samples/bpf: add new hid_mouse example Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 19:30 ` Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 21/23] samples/bpf: HID: " Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 22/23] HID: bpf: add Surface Dial example Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 22/23] samples/bpf: HID: " Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-24 13:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 23/23] Documentation: add HID-BPF docs Benjamin Tissoires
2022-08-26 2:00 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 00/23] Introduce eBPF support for HID devices patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220824134055.1328882-4-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--to=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davemarchevsky@fb.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=joe@cilium.io \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=tero.kristo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).