From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
Ferry Toth <fntoth@gmail.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Andre Edich <andre.edich@microchip.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
kernelci-results@groups.io, bot@kernelci.org,
gtucker@collabora.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: stable-rc/linux-5.18.y bisection: baseline.login on panda
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 06:21:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220825042106.GA16015@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YwaqZ1+zm78vl4L1@sirena.org.uk>
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 11:47:03PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 01:22:12PM -0700, KernelCI bot wrote:
> The KernelCI bisection bot identified 7eea9a60703ca ("usbnet: smsc95xx:
> Forward PHY interrupts to PHY driver to avoid polling") as causing a
> boot regression on Panda in v5.18. The board stops detecting a link
> which breks NFS boot:
>
> <6>[ 4.953613] smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth0: register 'smsc95xx' at usb-4a064c00.ehci-1.1, smsc95xx USB 2.0 Ethernet, 02:03:01:8c:13:b0
> <6>[ 5.032928] smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth0: hardware isn't capable of remote wakeup
> <6>[ 5.044036] smsc95xx 2-1.1:1.0 eth0: Link is Down
> <6>[ 25.053924] Waiting up to 100 more seconds for network.
> <6>[ 45.074005] Waiting up to 80 more seconds for network.
> <6>[ 65.093933] Waiting up to 60 more seconds for network.
> <6>[ 85.123992] Waiting up to 40 more seconds for network.
> <6>[ 105.143951] Waiting up to 20 more seconds for network.
> <5>[ 125.084014] Sending DHCP requests ...... timed out!
Looks like v5.19 boots fine (with the offending commit), so only
v5.18-stable and v5.15-stable are affected:
https://storage.kernelci.org/stable-rc/linux-5.19.y/v5.19.3-366-g32f80a5b58e2/arm/multi_v7_defconfig/gcc-10/lab-baylibre/baseline-panda.html
The offending commit was a new feature introduced in v5.19,
it deliberately wasn't tagged for stable. Aggressively
backporting such new features always carries a risk of
regressions.
Off the cuff I don't see that a prerequisite commit is missing
in stable kernels. So just reverting the offending commit in
v5.18-stable and v5.15-stable (but not in v5.19-stable) might
be the simplest solution.
Thanks,
Lukas
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-25 4:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <63068874.170a0220.2f9fc.b822@mx.google.com>
2022-08-24 22:47 ` stable-rc/linux-5.18.y bisection: baseline.login on panda Mark Brown
2022-08-25 4:21 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220825042106.GA16015@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=andre.edich@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bot@kernelci.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=fntoth@gmail.com \
--cc=gtucker@collabora.com \
--cc=kernelci-results@groups.io \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).