From: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
To: Andrey Zhadchenko <andrey.zhadchenko@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvswitch.org, pshelar@ovn.org,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com,
alexander.mikhalitsyn@virtuozzo.com, avagin@google.com,
i.maximets@ovn.org, aconole@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] openvswitch: allow specifying ifindex of new interfaces
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 11:11:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220826091147.eechwvoa6eckhuq4@wittgenstein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220825020450.664147-1-andrey.zhadchenko@virtuozzo.com>
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 05:04:48AM +0300, Andrey Zhadchenko wrote:
> Hi!
>
> CRIU currently do not support checkpoint/restore of OVS configurations, but
> there was several requests for it. For example,
> https://github.com/lxc/lxc/issues/2909
>
> The main problem is ifindexes of newly created interfaces. We realy need to
> preserve them after restore. Current openvswitch API does not allow to
> specify ifindex. Most of the time we can just create an interface via
> generic netlink requests and plug it into ovs but datapaths (generally any
> OVS_VPORT_TYPE_INTERNAL) can only be created via openvswitch requests which
> do not support selecting ifindex.
>
> This patch allows to do so.
> For new datapaths I decided to use dp_infindex in header as infindex
> because it control ifindex for other requests too.
> For internal vports I reused OVS_VPORT_ATTR_IFINDEX.
>
> The only concern I have is that previously dp_ifindex was not used for
> OVS_DP_VMD_NEW requests and some software may not set it to zero. However
> we have been running this patch at Virtuozzo for 2 years and have not
> encountered this problem. Not sure if it is worth to add new
> ovs_datapath_attr instead.
>
> v2:
> Added two more patches.
>
> Add OVS_DP_ATTR_PER_CPU_PIDS to dumps as suggested by Ilya Maximets.
> Without it we won't be able to checkpoint/restore new openvswitch
> configurations which use OVS_DP_F_DISPATCH_UPCALL_PER_CPU flag.
>
> Found and fixed memory leak on datapath creation error path.
>
> v3:
> Sent memleak fix separately to net.
> Improved patches according to the reviews:
> - Added new OVS_DP_ATTR_IFINDEX instead of using ovs_header->dp_ifindex
> - Pre-allocated bigger reply message for upcall pids
> - Some small fixes
Seems good,
Acked-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <brauner@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-26 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-25 2:04 [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] openvswitch: allow specifying ifindex of new interfaces Andrey Zhadchenko
2022-08-25 2:04 ` [PATCH net-next v3 1/2] " Andrey Zhadchenko
2022-08-25 2:04 ` [PATCH net-next v3 2/2] openvswitch: add OVS_DP_ATTR_PER_CPU_PIDS to get requests Andrey Zhadchenko
2022-08-26 9:11 ` Christian Brauner [this message]
2022-08-27 2:50 ` [PATCH net-next v3 0/2] openvswitch: allow specifying ifindex of new interfaces patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220826091147.eechwvoa6eckhuq4@wittgenstein \
--to=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.mikhalitsyn@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=andrey.zhadchenko@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=avagin@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dev@openvswitch.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=i.maximets@ovn.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
--cc=ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox