From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
<linux@armlinux.org.uk>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <pabeni@redhat.com>, <michael@walle.cc>,
<UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>, <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: phy: micrel: Make the GPIO to be non-exclusive
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2022 08:58:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220827065838.7iw3cubgtzhwqc53@soft-dev3-1.localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220826183711.567bc7e8@kernel.org>
The 08/26/2022 18:37, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
Hi Jakub,
>
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2022 22:16:31 +0200 Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 10:14:47PM +0200, Horatiu Vultur wrote:
> > > The same GPIO line can be shared by multiple phys for the coma mode pin.
> > > If that is the case then, all the other phys that share the same line
> > > will failed to be probed because the access to the gpio line is not
> > > non-exclusive.
> > > Fix this by making access to the gpio line to be nonexclusive using flag
> > > GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE. This allows all the other PHYs to be
> > > probed.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 738871b09250ee ("net: phy: micrel: add coma mode GPIO")
> > > Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
>
> The tree name switch in the subject compared to v1 is unintentional?
Yes I have switch it by mistake.
It should be net. I can send a new version if it is needed.
--
/Horatiu
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-08-27 6:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-08-25 20:14 [PATCH net-next v2] net: phy: micrel: Make the GPIO to be non-exclusive Horatiu Vultur
2022-08-25 20:16 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-08-27 1:37 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-08-27 6:58 ` Horatiu Vultur [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220827065838.7iw3cubgtzhwqc53@soft-dev3-1.localhost \
--to=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).