From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2F5C0502C for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:38:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231819AbiHaPiL (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:38:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33184 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231871AbiHaPiJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:38:09 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B168DD8E14 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 08:38:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id w2so3421130edc.0 for ; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 08:38:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc; bh=TEtlNaEZ/NGkHaRfRANoWs1dAUq19ASkw09zMlPYlIE=; b=acz5kOltoFv7/rjQZLYF/GqSL+Un4BgW/8jZNv+K8BNiDHQcbbtaQzqqHWpo9aFfqG KeCOVQeeDTZHlcSaOParohtcfyr2/5auMLzf9NfDvX/hLnjuMaqbS85Tee0xgMK9Gk+W 9CJfjMXdp7pQ0jKejLbQ7c9n1sPRBBdUAqmUMe3KjBTuq5ubtw2FSvwEukz8BAp2D0qJ s007FHluqVtDOPX7Lxwg4fj7S7KP4eJULwsOfcTwqJ3X5x8kvLR6NC9cxzqc+M8txoVG MJaei/hXmbSnkcKOdJlKitpdu3SOEPv4xNYkNr0PcjneH52V6gaMc5LApArngdIfRxxh vtqg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=TEtlNaEZ/NGkHaRfRANoWs1dAUq19ASkw09zMlPYlIE=; b=D+fiuw4GPAqVn46uP+CW/AyGWZjLt7Ota9vt9cmYBcX0JF7br2++Ay1hf/TegB1d7d qNZ4oLJzV59ERAbtl7nRisQQor99k7AtfHbfeILydLFMtaoonaFIgvJcubGmVXDRsuCO T9gp7XITLjW82HmDEETP/AYPGyxseMSZoEKQ9q26GGkkcdmM6wfhYIBkCkReciz1P/aY lQ6REuLW1zikju8DK/Lammzb0PKaIHmrBr3zug5b5AAucJdlOdPjjWAmLt4RejlLQ0wZ 3NUMHgX13UmlXPDfTuMqsXxdDvPeiZ6NX7qvYRmiMXSq30V/C9OXYiRqAigy1dRgj+Gv d91Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo24ERP94N7/x1skSicl4xqAyYvY/W1PYnoZU5W3yAz8AUgnUu2C qSAROoayHuN5eB0NpV/I0/w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6lZBgfFYHUX6E24UR78tqRhYjpdI/BYCBKNHnCc2HyX7ZIlyvJD7GR/apyuOzuxIpVmMYHBw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2a06:b0:447:820a:1afe with SMTP id ey6-20020a0564022a0600b00447820a1afemr25322012edb.291.1661960287130; Wed, 31 Aug 2022 08:38:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from skbuf ([188.27.184.197]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d11-20020a50f68b000000b00445c0ab272fsm9347322edn.29.2022.08.31.08.38.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 31 Aug 2022 08:38:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 18:38:04 +0300 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Romain Naour Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, pabeni@redhat.com, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, davem@davemloft.net, f.fainelli@gmail.com, vivien.didelot@gmail.com, andrew@lunn.ch, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, woojung.huh@microchip.com, Romain Naour , Arun Ramadoss Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] net: dsa: microchip: add KSZ9896 switch support Message-ID: <20220831153804.mqkbw2ln6n67m6jf@skbuf> References: <20220830075900.3401750-1-romain.naour@smile.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220830075900.3401750-1-romain.naour@smile.fr> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Hi Romain, On Tue, Aug 30, 2022 at 09:58:59AM +0200, Romain Naour wrote: > It seems that the KSZ9896 support has been sent to the kernel netdev > mailing list a while ago but no further patch was sent after the > initial review: > https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg554771.html > > The initial testing with the ksz9896 was done on a 5.10 kernel > but due to recent changes in dsa microchip driver it was required > to rework this initial version for 6.0-rc2 kernel. > > v2: remove duplicated SoB line To be clear, was the patch also tested on net-next, or only formatted there?