From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50125C54EE9 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 19:24:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229832AbiIVTYm (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:24:42 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41326 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229566AbiIVTYl (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Sep 2022 15:24:41 -0400 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E124229CA8 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:24:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34E34B83A2A for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 19:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29EB6C433D7; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 19:24:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1663874676; bh=PMk3ZRQ4KE1GshWil1PHu/Mwcpf3tOixr3I4U9q0ies=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=S8BgrW7Z75wSRj2uIYpVqk8624bgbXX5M83BtUyR+nWLGQGq+5ORgB35QGLNCt7ly ilvBDVP1hHFjVBhGDaZycb/BGG5u2uEyWzwfVN8htwA1rvGt9N28WbaUNeddM1N4rR 0rBLhhuE0jh5qMd1gfyiDx9366isr0jtDyntFsDdQcbJ5BDeXcTp2oF9vt8afhdbho Yq3/16kUAsXj4Y/SDtvngsedhHEC7WhR7impuWiUb8i5Z5wsgjUzRSWJyG6AB7ZR7i 6EQw+G3xeUUHVA38BnQp9fJeU0uO1VT39Mcr2WID6vFQtL0tIwmPFK4aTllxTptVRe R2YvtPTw3FO+g== Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 12:24:35 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Leon Romanovsky Cc: Simon Horman , David Miller , Paolo Abeni , netdev@vger.kernel.org, oss-drivers@corigine.com, Diana Wang , Peng Zhang , Michael Chan , Andy Gospodarek , Gal Pressman , Saeed Mahameed , Jesse Brandeburg , Tony Nguyen , Edward Cree , Vladimir Oltean , Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: driver uABI review list? (was: Re: [PATCH/RFC net-next 0/3] nfp: support VF multi-queues configuration) Message-ID: <20220922122435.49bedc23@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20220920151419.76050-1-simon.horman@corigine.com> <20220921063448.5b0dd32b@kernel.org> <20220922091414.4086f747@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 22 Sep 2022 22:08:22 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote: > > > Please don't. It will cause to an opposite situation where UAPI > > > discussions will be hidden from most people. > > > > Oh, it'd just be an additional list, the patches would still need > > to CC netdev. > > First, there is already such ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-api/ > Second, you disconnect discussion from actual patches and this can > cause to repeating of same arguments while reviewing patches. I phrased what I meant poorly. The list would be in addition to netdev. All patches CCing the new list would also have to CC netdev. So if you subscribe and read netdev that'd be enough, no extra effort needed. So no disconnect from patches or repetition. linux-api is obviously not a subset of netdev, it's not a fit.