[PATCH] bpf, test_run: Track allocation size of data

[PATCH] bpf, test_run: Track allocation size of data

[Kees Cook]

In preparation for requiring that build_skb() have a non-zero size
argument, track the data allocation size explicitly and pass it into
build_skb(). To retain the original result of using the ksize()
side-effect on the skb size, explicitly round up the size during
allocation.

Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Cc: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
---
 net/bpf/test_run.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index 13d578ce2a09..299ff102f516 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -762,28 +762,38 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_ref, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
 BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_destructive, KF_DESTRUCTIVE)
 BTF_SET8_END(test_sk_check_kfunc_ids)
 
-static void *bpf_test_init(const union bpf_attr *kattr, u32 user_size,
-			   u32 size, u32 headroom, u32 tailroom)
+struct bpfalloc {
+	size_t len;
+	void  *data;
+};
+
+static int bpf_test_init(struct bpfalloc *alloc,
+			 const union bpf_attr *kattr, u32 user_size,
+			 u32 size, u32 headroom, u32 tailroom)
 {
 	void __user *data_in = u64_to_user_ptr(kattr->test.data_in);
-	void *data;
 
 	if (size < ETH_HLEN || size > PAGE_SIZE - headroom - tailroom)
-		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (user_size > size)
-		return ERR_PTR(-EMSGSIZE);
+		return -EMSGSIZE;
 
-	data = kzalloc(size + headroom + tailroom, GFP_USER);
-	if (!data)
-		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	alloc->len = kmalloc_size_roundup(size + headroom + tailroom);
+	alloc->data = kzalloc(alloc->len, GFP_USER);
+	if (!alloc->data) {
+		alloc->len = 0;
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
 
-	if (copy_from_user(data + headroom, data_in, user_size)) {
-		kfree(data);
-		return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
+	if (copy_from_user(alloc->data + headroom, data_in, user_size)) {
+		kfree(alloc->data);
+		alloc->data = NULL;
+		alloc->len = 0;
+		return -EFAULT;
 	}
 
-	return data;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 int bpf_prog_test_run_tracing(struct bpf_prog *prog,
@@ -1086,25 +1096,25 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
 	u32 size = kattr->test.data_size_in;
 	u32 repeat = kattr->test.repeat;
 	struct __sk_buff *ctx = NULL;
+	struct bpfalloc alloc = { };
 	u32 retval, duration;
 	int hh_len = ETH_HLEN;
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	struct sock *sk;
-	void *data;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (kattr->test.flags || kattr->test.cpu || kattr->test.batch_size)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	data = bpf_test_init(kattr, kattr->test.data_size_in,
-			     size, NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN,
-			     SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)));
-	if (IS_ERR(data))
-		return PTR_ERR(data);
+	ret = bpf_test_init(&alloc, kattr, kattr->test.data_size_in,
+			    size, NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN,
+			    SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)));
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
 	ctx = bpf_ctx_init(kattr, sizeof(struct __sk_buff));
 	if (IS_ERR(ctx)) {
-		kfree(data);
+		kfree(alloc.data);
 		return PTR_ERR(ctx);
 	}
 
@@ -1124,15 +1134,15 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
 
 	sk = sk_alloc(net, AF_UNSPEC, GFP_USER, &bpf_dummy_proto, 1);
 	if (!sk) {
-		kfree(data);
+		kfree(alloc.data);
 		kfree(ctx);
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 	sock_init_data(NULL, sk);
 
-	skb = build_skb(data, 0);
+	skb = build_skb(alloc.data, alloc.len);
 	if (!skb) {
-		kfree(data);
+		kfree(alloc.data);
 		kfree(ctx);
 		sk_free(sk);
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -1283,10 +1293,10 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_xdp(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
 	u32 repeat = kattr->test.repeat;
 	struct netdev_rx_queue *rxqueue;
 	struct skb_shared_info *sinfo;
+	struct bpfalloc alloc = {};
 	struct xdp_buff xdp = {};
 	int i, ret = -EINVAL;
 	struct xdp_md *ctx;
-	void *data;
 
 	if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_XDP_DEVMAP ||
 	    prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_XDP_CPUMAP)
@@ -1329,16 +1339,14 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_xdp(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
 		size = max_data_sz;
 	}
 
-	data = bpf_test_init(kattr, size, max_data_sz, headroom, tailroom);
-	if (IS_ERR(data)) {
-		ret = PTR_ERR(data);
+	ret = bpf_test_init(&alloc, kattr, size, max_data_sz, headroom, tailroom);
+	if (ret)
 		goto free_ctx;
-	}
 
 	rxqueue = __netif_get_rx_queue(current->nsproxy->net_ns->loopback_dev, 0);
 	rxqueue->xdp_rxq.frag_size = headroom + max_data_sz + tailroom;
 	xdp_init_buff(&xdp, rxqueue->xdp_rxq.frag_size, &rxqueue->xdp_rxq);
-	xdp_prepare_buff(&xdp, data, headroom, size, true);
+	xdp_prepare_buff(&xdp, alloc.data, headroom, size, true);
 	sinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(&xdp);
 
 	ret = xdp_convert_md_to_buff(ctx, &xdp);
@@ -1410,7 +1418,7 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_xdp(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
 free_data:
 	for (i = 0; i < sinfo->nr_frags; i++)
 		__free_page(skb_frag_page(&sinfo->frags[i]));
-	kfree(data);
+	kfree(alloc.data);
 free_ctx:
 	kfree(ctx);
 	return ret;
@@ -1441,10 +1449,10 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 	u32 repeat = kattr->test.repeat;
 	struct bpf_flow_keys *user_ctx;
 	struct bpf_flow_keys flow_keys;
+	struct bpfalloc alloc = {};
 	const struct ethhdr *eth;
 	unsigned int flags = 0;
 	u32 retval, duration;
-	void *data;
 	int ret;
 
 	if (kattr->test.flags || kattr->test.cpu || kattr->test.batch_size)
@@ -1453,18 +1461,18 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 	if (size < ETH_HLEN)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	data = bpf_test_init(kattr, kattr->test.data_size_in, size, 0, 0);
-	if (IS_ERR(data))
-		return PTR_ERR(data);
+	ret = bpf_test_init(&alloc, kattr, kattr->test.data_size_in, size, 0, 0);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
-	eth = (struct ethhdr *)data;
+	eth = (struct ethhdr *)alloc.data;
 
 	if (!repeat)
 		repeat = 1;
 
 	user_ctx = bpf_ctx_init(kattr, sizeof(struct bpf_flow_keys));
 	if (IS_ERR(user_ctx)) {
-		kfree(data);
+		kfree(alloc.data);
 		return PTR_ERR(user_ctx);
 	}
 	if (user_ctx) {
@@ -1475,8 +1483,8 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 	}
 
 	ctx.flow_keys = &flow_keys;
-	ctx.data = data;
-	ctx.data_end = (__u8 *)data + size;
+	ctx.data = alloc.data;
+	ctx.data_end = (__u8 *)alloc.data + size;
 
 	bpf_test_timer_enter(&t);
 	do {
@@ -1496,7 +1504,7 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 
 out:
 	kfree(user_ctx);
-	kfree(data);
+	kfree(alloc.data);
 	return ret;
 }
 
-- 
2.34.1

Re: [PATCH] bpf, test_run: Track allocation size of data

[Alexei Starovoitov]

On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 2:02 AM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> In preparation for requiring that build_skb() have a non-zero size
> argument, track the data allocation size explicitly and pass it into
> build_skb(). To retain the original result of using the ksize()
> side-effect on the skb size, explicitly round up the size during
> allocation.
>
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
> Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
> Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
> Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
> Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> Cc: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
> Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
>  net/bpf/test_run.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> index 13d578ce2a09..299ff102f516 100644
> --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
> +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> @@ -762,28 +762,38 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_ref, KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
>  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_destructive, KF_DESTRUCTIVE)
>  BTF_SET8_END(test_sk_check_kfunc_ids)
>
> -static void *bpf_test_init(const union bpf_attr *kattr, u32 user_size,
> -                          u32 size, u32 headroom, u32 tailroom)
> +struct bpfalloc {
> +       size_t len;
> +       void  *data;
> +};
> +
> +static int bpf_test_init(struct bpfalloc *alloc,
> +                        const union bpf_attr *kattr, u32 user_size,
> +                        u32 size, u32 headroom, u32 tailroom)
>  {
>         void __user *data_in = u64_to_user_ptr(kattr->test.data_in);
> -       void *data;
>
>         if (size < ETH_HLEN || size > PAGE_SIZE - headroom - tailroom)
> -               return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +               return -EINVAL;
>
>         if (user_size > size)
> -               return ERR_PTR(-EMSGSIZE);
> +               return -EMSGSIZE;
>
> -       data = kzalloc(size + headroom + tailroom, GFP_USER);
> -       if (!data)
> -               return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +       alloc->len = kmalloc_size_roundup(size + headroom + tailroom);
> +       alloc->data = kzalloc(alloc->len, GFP_USER);

Don't you need to do this generalically in many places in the kernel?

Re: [PATCH] bpf, test_run: Track allocation size of data

[Kees Cook]

On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 09:29:07AM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 2:02 AM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> > +       alloc->len = kmalloc_size_roundup(size + headroom + tailroom);
> > +       alloc->data = kzalloc(alloc->len, GFP_USER);
> 
> Don't you need to do this generalically in many places in the kernel?

The size tracking or the rounding up?

The need for rounding up is surprisingly rare[1] -- very few things actually
used ksize(), and almost all of them are due to following some variation
of a realloc idiom. I've sent patches for all of them now, so that should
be a short road to solving the problems ksize() created.

The need for missed size tracking is also pretty uncommon (most
dynamically sized things already track their size in some form
or another). Finding a truly generalizable solution is an ongoing
experiment[2].

-Kees

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220923202822.2667581-1-keescook@chromium.org/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/llvm/20220504014440.3697851-1-keescook@chromium.org/

-- 
Kees Cook

Re: [PATCH] bpf, test_run: Track allocation size of data

[sdf]

On 10/18, Kees Cook wrote:
> In preparation for requiring that build_skb() have a non-zero size
> argument, track the data allocation size explicitly and pass it into
> build_skb(). To retain the original result of using the ksize()
> side-effect on the skb size, explicitly round up the size during
> allocation.

Can you share more on the end goal? Is the plan to remove ksize(data)
from build_skb and pass it via size argument?

> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
> Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
> Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
> Cc: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
> Cc: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> Cc: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>
> Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> ---
>   net/bpf/test_run.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>   1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

> diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> index 13d578ce2a09..299ff102f516 100644
> --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
> +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
> @@ -762,28 +762,38 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_ref,  
> KF_TRUSTED_ARGS)
>   BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_kfunc_call_test_destructive, KF_DESTRUCTIVE)
>   BTF_SET8_END(test_sk_check_kfunc_ids)

> -static void *bpf_test_init(const union bpf_attr *kattr, u32 user_size,
> -			   u32 size, u32 headroom, u32 tailroom)
> +struct bpfalloc {
> +	size_t len;
> +	void  *data;
> +};
> +
> +static int bpf_test_init(struct bpfalloc *alloc,
> +			 const union bpf_attr *kattr, u32 user_size,
> +			 u32 size, u32 headroom, u32 tailroom)
>   {
>   	void __user *data_in = u64_to_user_ptr(kattr->test.data_in);
> -	void *data;

>   	if (size < ETH_HLEN || size > PAGE_SIZE - headroom - tailroom)
> -		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +		return -EINVAL;

>   	if (user_size > size)
> -		return ERR_PTR(-EMSGSIZE);
> +		return -EMSGSIZE;

> -	data = kzalloc(size + headroom + tailroom, GFP_USER);
> -	if (!data)
> -		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);

[..]

> +	alloc->len = kmalloc_size_roundup(size + headroom + tailroom);
> +	alloc->data = kzalloc(alloc->len, GFP_USER);

I still probably miss something. Here, why do we need to do
kmalloc_size_roundup+kzalloc vs doing kzalloc+ksize?

	data = bpf_test_init(kattr, kattr->test.data_size_in,
			     size, NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN,
			     SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)));

	skb = build_skb(data, ksize(data));

> +	if (!alloc->data) {
> +		alloc->len = 0;
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}

> -	if (copy_from_user(data + headroom, data_in, user_size)) {
> -		kfree(data);
> -		return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
> +	if (copy_from_user(alloc->data + headroom, data_in, user_size)) {
> +		kfree(alloc->data);
> +		alloc->data = NULL;
> +		alloc->len = 0;
> +		return -EFAULT;
>   	}

> -	return data;
> +	return 0;
>   }

>   int bpf_prog_test_run_tracing(struct bpf_prog *prog,
> @@ -1086,25 +1096,25 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog,  
> const union bpf_attr *kattr,
>   	u32 size = kattr->test.data_size_in;
>   	u32 repeat = kattr->test.repeat;
>   	struct __sk_buff *ctx = NULL;
> +	struct bpfalloc alloc = { };
>   	u32 retval, duration;
>   	int hh_len = ETH_HLEN;
>   	struct sk_buff *skb;
>   	struct sock *sk;
> -	void *data;
>   	int ret;

>   	if (kattr->test.flags || kattr->test.cpu || kattr->test.batch_size)
>   		return -EINVAL;

> -	data = bpf_test_init(kattr, kattr->test.data_size_in,
> -			     size, NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN,
> -			     SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)));
> -	if (IS_ERR(data))
> -		return PTR_ERR(data);
> +	ret = bpf_test_init(&alloc, kattr, kattr->test.data_size_in,
> +			    size, NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN,
> +			    SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)));
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

>   	ctx = bpf_ctx_init(kattr, sizeof(struct __sk_buff));
>   	if (IS_ERR(ctx)) {
> -		kfree(data);
> +		kfree(alloc.data);
>   		return PTR_ERR(ctx);
>   	}

> @@ -1124,15 +1134,15 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog,  
> const union bpf_attr *kattr,

>   	sk = sk_alloc(net, AF_UNSPEC, GFP_USER, &bpf_dummy_proto, 1);
>   	if (!sk) {
> -		kfree(data);
> +		kfree(alloc.data);
>   		kfree(ctx);
>   		return -ENOMEM;
>   	}
>   	sock_init_data(NULL, sk);

> -	skb = build_skb(data, 0);
> +	skb = build_skb(alloc.data, alloc.len);
>   	if (!skb) {
> -		kfree(data);
> +		kfree(alloc.data);
>   		kfree(ctx);
>   		sk_free(sk);
>   		return -ENOMEM;
> @@ -1283,10 +1293,10 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_xdp(struct bpf_prog *prog,  
> const union bpf_attr *kattr,
>   	u32 repeat = kattr->test.repeat;
>   	struct netdev_rx_queue *rxqueue;
>   	struct skb_shared_info *sinfo;
> +	struct bpfalloc alloc = {};
>   	struct xdp_buff xdp = {};
>   	int i, ret = -EINVAL;
>   	struct xdp_md *ctx;
> -	void *data;

>   	if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_XDP_DEVMAP ||
>   	    prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_XDP_CPUMAP)
> @@ -1329,16 +1339,14 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_xdp(struct bpf_prog *prog,  
> const union bpf_attr *kattr,
>   		size = max_data_sz;
>   	}

> -	data = bpf_test_init(kattr, size, max_data_sz, headroom, tailroom);
> -	if (IS_ERR(data)) {
> -		ret = PTR_ERR(data);
> +	ret = bpf_test_init(&alloc, kattr, size, max_data_sz, headroom,  
> tailroom);
> +	if (ret)
>   		goto free_ctx;
> -	}

>   	rxqueue = __netif_get_rx_queue(current->nsproxy->net_ns->loopback_dev,  
> 0);
>   	rxqueue->xdp_rxq.frag_size = headroom + max_data_sz + tailroom;
>   	xdp_init_buff(&xdp, rxqueue->xdp_rxq.frag_size, &rxqueue->xdp_rxq);
> -	xdp_prepare_buff(&xdp, data, headroom, size, true);
> +	xdp_prepare_buff(&xdp, alloc.data, headroom, size, true);
>   	sinfo = xdp_get_shared_info_from_buff(&xdp);

>   	ret = xdp_convert_md_to_buff(ctx, &xdp);
> @@ -1410,7 +1418,7 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_xdp(struct bpf_prog *prog,  
> const union bpf_attr *kattr,
>   free_data:
>   	for (i = 0; i < sinfo->nr_frags; i++)
>   		__free_page(skb_frag_page(&sinfo->frags[i]));
> -	kfree(data);
> +	kfree(alloc.data);
>   free_ctx:
>   	kfree(ctx);
>   	return ret;
> @@ -1441,10 +1449,10 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector(struct  
> bpf_prog *prog,
>   	u32 repeat = kattr->test.repeat;
>   	struct bpf_flow_keys *user_ctx;
>   	struct bpf_flow_keys flow_keys;
> +	struct bpfalloc alloc = {};
>   	const struct ethhdr *eth;
>   	unsigned int flags = 0;
>   	u32 retval, duration;
> -	void *data;
>   	int ret;

>   	if (kattr->test.flags || kattr->test.cpu || kattr->test.batch_size)
> @@ -1453,18 +1461,18 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector(struct  
> bpf_prog *prog,
>   	if (size < ETH_HLEN)
>   		return -EINVAL;

> -	data = bpf_test_init(kattr, kattr->test.data_size_in, size, 0, 0);
> -	if (IS_ERR(data))
> -		return PTR_ERR(data);
> +	ret = bpf_test_init(&alloc, kattr, kattr->test.data_size_in, size, 0,  
> 0);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

> -	eth = (struct ethhdr *)data;
> +	eth = (struct ethhdr *)alloc.data;

>   	if (!repeat)
>   		repeat = 1;

>   	user_ctx = bpf_ctx_init(kattr, sizeof(struct bpf_flow_keys));
>   	if (IS_ERR(user_ctx)) {
> -		kfree(data);
> +		kfree(alloc.data);
>   		return PTR_ERR(user_ctx);
>   	}
>   	if (user_ctx) {
> @@ -1475,8 +1483,8 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector(struct  
> bpf_prog *prog,
>   	}

>   	ctx.flow_keys = &flow_keys;
> -	ctx.data = data;
> -	ctx.data_end = (__u8 *)data + size;
> +	ctx.data = alloc.data;
> +	ctx.data_end = (__u8 *)alloc.data + size;

>   	bpf_test_timer_enter(&t);
>   	do {
> @@ -1496,7 +1504,7 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_flow_dissector(struct  
> bpf_prog *prog,

>   out:
>   	kfree(user_ctx);
> -	kfree(data);
> +	kfree(alloc.data);
>   	return ret;
>   }

> --
> 2.34.1