netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	edumazet@google.com, roopa@nvidia.com, razor@blackwall.org,
	mlxsw@nvidia.com, Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH net-next 10/19] bridge: mcast: Split (*, G) and (S, G) addition into different functions
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:04:11 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221018120420.561846-11-idosch@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221018120420.561846-1-idosch@nvidia.com>

When the bridge is using IGMP version 3 or MLD version 2, it handles the
addition of (*, G) and (S, G) entries differently.

When a new (S, G) port group entry is added, all the (*, G) EXCLUDE
ports need to be added to the port group of the new entry. Similarly,
when a new (*, G) EXCLUDE port group entry is added, the port needs to
be added to the port group of all the matching (S, G) entries.

Subsequent patches will create more differences between both entry
types. Namely, filter mode and source list can only be specified for (*,
G) entries.

Given the current and future differences between both entry types,
handle the addition of each entry type in a different function, thereby
avoiding the creation of one complex function.

Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
---
 net/bridge/br_mdb.c | 145 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bridge/br_mdb.c b/net/bridge/br_mdb.c
index dd56063430ed..a48eef866974 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_mdb.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_mdb.c
@@ -786,21 +786,107 @@ __br_mdb_choose_context(struct net_bridge *br,
 	return brmctx;
 }
 
+static int br_mdb_add_group_sg(struct br_mdb_config *cfg,
+			       struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *mp,
+			       struct net_bridge_mcast *brmctx,
+			       unsigned char flags,
+			       struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+	struct net_bridge_port_group __rcu **pp;
+	struct net_bridge_port_group *p;
+	unsigned long now = jiffies;
+
+	for (pp = &mp->ports;
+	     (p = mlock_dereference(*pp, cfg->br)) != NULL;
+	     pp = &p->next) {
+		if (p->key.port == cfg->p) {
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "(S, G) group is already joined by port");
+			return -EEXIST;
+		}
+		if ((unsigned long)p->key.port < (unsigned long)cfg->p)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	p = br_multicast_new_port_group(cfg->p, &cfg->group, *pp, flags, NULL,
+					MCAST_INCLUDE, RTPROT_STATIC);
+	if (unlikely(!p)) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Couldn't allocate new (S, G) port group");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+	rcu_assign_pointer(*pp, p);
+	if (!(flags & MDB_PG_FLAGS_PERMANENT))
+		mod_timer(&p->timer,
+			  now + brmctx->multicast_membership_interval);
+	br_mdb_notify(cfg->br->dev, mp, p, RTM_NEWMDB);
+
+	/* All of (*, G) EXCLUDE ports need to be added to the new (S, G) for
+	 * proper replication.
+	 */
+	if (br_multicast_should_handle_mode(brmctx, cfg->group.proto)) {
+		struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *star_mp;
+		struct br_ip star_group;
+
+		star_group = p->key.addr;
+		memset(&star_group.src, 0, sizeof(star_group.src));
+		star_mp = br_mdb_ip_get(cfg->br, &star_group);
+		if (star_mp)
+			br_multicast_sg_add_exclude_ports(star_mp, p);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int br_mdb_add_group_star_g(struct br_mdb_config *cfg,
+				   struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *mp,
+				   struct net_bridge_mcast *brmctx,
+				   unsigned char flags,
+				   struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
+{
+	struct net_bridge_port_group __rcu **pp;
+	struct net_bridge_port_group *p;
+	unsigned long now = jiffies;
+
+	for (pp = &mp->ports;
+	     (p = mlock_dereference(*pp, cfg->br)) != NULL;
+	     pp = &p->next) {
+		if (p->key.port == cfg->p) {
+			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "(*, G) group is already joined by port");
+			return -EEXIST;
+		}
+		if ((unsigned long)p->key.port < (unsigned long)cfg->p)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	p = br_multicast_new_port_group(cfg->p, &cfg->group, *pp, flags, NULL,
+					MCAST_EXCLUDE, RTPROT_STATIC);
+	if (unlikely(!p)) {
+		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Couldn't allocate new (*, G) port group");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+	rcu_assign_pointer(*pp, p);
+	if (!(flags & MDB_PG_FLAGS_PERMANENT))
+		mod_timer(&p->timer,
+			  now + brmctx->multicast_membership_interval);
+	br_mdb_notify(cfg->br->dev, mp, p, RTM_NEWMDB);
+	/* If we are adding a new EXCLUDE port group (*, G), it needs to be
+	 * also added to all (S, G) entries for proper replication.
+	 */
+	if (br_multicast_should_handle_mode(brmctx, cfg->group.proto))
+		br_multicast_star_g_handle_mode(p, MCAST_EXCLUDE);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int br_mdb_add_group(struct br_mdb_config *cfg,
 			    struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
 {
-	struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *mp, *star_mp;
-	struct net_bridge_port_group __rcu **pp;
 	struct br_mdb_entry *entry = cfg->entry;
 	struct net_bridge_port *port = cfg->p;
+	struct net_bridge_mdb_entry *mp;
 	struct net_bridge *br = cfg->br;
-	struct net_bridge_port_group *p;
 	struct net_bridge_mcast *brmctx;
 	struct br_ip group = cfg->group;
-	unsigned long now = jiffies;
 	unsigned char flags = 0;
-	struct br_ip star_group;
-	u8 filter_mode;
 
 	brmctx = __br_mdb_choose_context(br, entry, extack);
 	if (!brmctx)
@@ -823,52 +909,13 @@ static int br_mdb_add_group(struct br_mdb_config *cfg,
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	for (pp = &mp->ports;
-	     (p = mlock_dereference(*pp, br)) != NULL;
-	     pp = &p->next) {
-		if (p->key.port == port) {
-			NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Group is already joined by port");
-			return -EEXIST;
-		}
-		if ((unsigned long)p->key.port < (unsigned long)port)
-			break;
-	}
-
-	filter_mode = br_multicast_is_star_g(&group) ? MCAST_EXCLUDE :
-						       MCAST_INCLUDE;
-
 	if (entry->state == MDB_PERMANENT)
 		flags |= MDB_PG_FLAGS_PERMANENT;
 
-	p = br_multicast_new_port_group(port, &group, *pp, flags, NULL,
-					filter_mode, RTPROT_STATIC);
-	if (unlikely(!p)) {
-		NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Couldn't allocate new port group");
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	}
-	rcu_assign_pointer(*pp, p);
-	if (entry->state == MDB_TEMPORARY)
-		mod_timer(&p->timer,
-			  now + brmctx->multicast_membership_interval);
-	br_mdb_notify(br->dev, mp, p, RTM_NEWMDB);
-	/* if we are adding a new EXCLUDE port group (*,G) it needs to be also
-	 * added to all S,G entries for proper replication, if we are adding
-	 * a new INCLUDE port (S,G) then all of *,G EXCLUDE ports need to be
-	 * added to it for proper replication
-	 */
-	if (br_multicast_should_handle_mode(brmctx, group.proto)) {
-		if (br_multicast_is_star_g(&group)) {
-			br_multicast_star_g_handle_mode(p, filter_mode);
-		} else {
-			star_group = p->key.addr;
-			memset(&star_group.src, 0, sizeof(star_group.src));
-			star_mp = br_mdb_ip_get(br, &star_group);
-			if (star_mp)
-				br_multicast_sg_add_exclude_ports(star_mp, p);
-		}
-	}
-
-	return 0;
+	if (br_multicast_is_star_g(&group))
+		return br_mdb_add_group_star_g(cfg, mp, brmctx, flags, extack);
+	else
+		return br_mdb_add_group_sg(cfg, mp, brmctx, flags, extack);
 }
 
 static int __br_mdb_add(struct br_mdb_config *cfg,
-- 
2.37.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-18 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-18 12:04 [RFC PATCH net-next 00/19] bridge: mcast: Extensions for EVPN Ido Schimmel
2022-10-18 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 01/19] bridge: mcast: Centralize netlink attribute parsing Ido Schimmel
2022-10-18 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 02/19] bridge: mcast: Remove redundant checks Ido Schimmel
2022-10-18 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 03/19] bridge: mcast: Use MDB configuration structure where possible Ido Schimmel
2022-10-18 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 04/19] bridge: mcast: Propagate MDB configuration structure further Ido Schimmel
2022-10-18 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 05/19] bridge: mcast: Use MDB group key from configuration structure Ido Schimmel
2022-10-18 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 06/19] bridge: mcast: Remove br_mdb_parse() Ido Schimmel
2022-10-18 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 07/19] bridge: mcast: Move checks out of critical section Ido Schimmel
2022-10-18 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 08/19] bridge: mcast: Remove redundant function arguments Ido Schimmel
2022-10-18 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 09/19] bridge: mcast: Do not derive entry type from its filter mode Ido Schimmel
2022-10-18 12:04 ` Ido Schimmel [this message]
2022-10-18 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 11/19] bridge: mcast: Place netlink policy before validation functions Ido Schimmel
2022-10-18 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 12/19] bridge: mcast: Add a centralized error path Ido Schimmel
2022-10-18 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 13/19] bridge: mcast: Expose br_multicast_new_group_src() Ido Schimmel
2022-10-18 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 14/19] bridge: mcast: Add a flag for user installed source entries Ido Schimmel
2022-10-18 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 15/19] bridge: mcast: Avoid arming group timer when (S, G) corresponds to a source Ido Schimmel
2022-10-18 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 16/19] bridge: mcast: Add support for (*, G) with a source list and filter mode Ido Schimmel
2022-10-18 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 17/19] bridge: mcast: Allow user space to add " Ido Schimmel
2022-10-19 13:28   ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
2022-11-03  9:09     ` Ido Schimmel
2022-10-18 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 18/19] bridge: mcast: Allow user space to specify MDB entry routing protocol Ido Schimmel
2022-10-18 12:04 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 19/19] bridge: mcast: Support replacement of MDB port group entries Ido Schimmel
2022-10-18 19:21 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 00/19] bridge: mcast: Extensions for EVPN Jakub Kicinski
2022-10-25 10:53   ` Ido Schimmel
2022-10-19 13:15 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221018120420.561846-11-idosch@nvidia.com \
    --to=idosch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=mlxsw@nvidia.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=razor@blackwall.org \
    --cc=roopa@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).