netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Rasesh Mody <rmody@marvell.com>,
	GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@marvell.com,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bnx2: Pass allocation size to build_skb()
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 19:06:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202210211853.99AE1276A4@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221019170255.100f41c7@kernel.org>

On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 05:02:55PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2022 01:59:29 -0700 Kees Cook wrote:
> > In preparation for requiring that build_skb() have a non-zero size
> > argument, pass the actual data allocation size explicitly into
> > build_skb().
> 
> build_skb(, 0) has the special meaning of "head buf has been kmalloc'd",
> rather than alloc_page(). Was this changed and I missed it?

Hm, I'm not clear on it. I see ksize() being called, but I guess that
works for alloc_page() allocations too?

build_skb
	__build_skb:
		__build_skb_around:
		        unsigned int size = frag_size ? : ksize(data);

So I guess in this case, this patch is wrong, and should instead be this
to match the ksize() used in build_skb():

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c
index fec57f1982c8..dbe310144780 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2.c
@@ -5415,8 +5415,9 @@ bnx2_set_rx_ring_size(struct bnx2 *bp, u32 size)
 
        bp->rx_buf_use_size = rx_size;
        /* hw alignment + build_skb() overhead*/
-       bp->rx_buf_size = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(bp->rx_buf_use_size + BNX2_RX_ALIGN) +
-               NET_SKB_PAD + SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
+       bp->rx_buf_size = kmalloc_size_roundup(
+               SKB_DATA_ALIGN(bp->rx_buf_use_size + BNX2_RX_ALIGN) +
+               NET_SKB_PAD + SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info)));
        bp->rx_jumbo_thresh = rx_size - BNX2_RX_OFFSET;
        bp->rx_ring_size = size;
        bp->rx_max_ring = bnx2_find_max_ring(size, BNX2_MAX_RX_RINGS);


-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-22  2:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-18  8:59 [PATCH] bnx2: Pass allocation size to build_skb() Kees Cook
2022-10-20  0:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-10-22  2:06   ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-10-22  3:44     ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202210211853.99AE1276A4@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@marvell.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=rmody@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).