From: Matej Vasilevski <matej.vasilevski@seznam.cz>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz>,
Ondrej Ille <ondrej.ille@gmail.com>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] can: ctucanfd: add HW timestamps to RX and error CAN frames
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 00:22:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221025222237.GA4635@hopium> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221024200238.tgqkjjyagklglshu@pengutronix.de>
Hi Marc,
thanks for another review from you.
I'll merge the responses for all three mails from you, so I don't spam
the mailing list too much.
On Mon, Oct 24, 2022 at 10:02:38PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 12.10.2022 08:25:56, Matej Vasilevski wrote:
> > This patch adds support for retrieving hardware timestamps to RX and
>
> Later in the code you set struct ethtool_ts_info::tx_types but the
> driver doesn't set TX timestamps, does it?
>
No, it doesn't explicitly. Unless something changed and I don't know about it,
all the drivers using can_put_echo_skb() (includes ctucanfd) now report
software (hardware if available) tx timestamps thanks to Vincent's patch.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkl/linux-can-next.git/commit/?id=12a18d79dc14c80b358dbd26461614b97f2ea4a6
> > error CAN frames. It uses timecounter and cyclecounter structures,
> > because the timestamping counter width depends on the IP core integration
> > (it might not always be 64-bit).
> > For platform devices, you should specify "ts" clock in device tree.
> > For PCI devices, the timestamping frequency is assumed to be the same
> > as bus frequency.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Matej Vasilevski <matej.vasilevski@seznam.cz>
>
> [...]
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/can/ctucanfd/ctucanfd_base.c b/drivers/net/can/ctucanfd/ctucanfd_base.c
> > index b8da15ea6ad9..079819d53e23 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/can/ctucanfd/ctucanfd_base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/can/ctucanfd/ctucanfd_base.c
>
> [...]
>
> > @@ -950,6 +986,11 @@ static int ctucan_rx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int quota)
> > cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_OVERFLOW;
> > stats->rx_packets++;
> > stats->rx_bytes += cf->can_dlc;
> > + if (priv->timestamp_enabled) {
> > + u64 tstamp = ctucan_read_timestamp_counter(priv);
> > +
> > + ctucan_skb_set_timestamp(priv, skb, tstamp);
> > + }
> > netif_rx(skb);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1230,6 +1271,9 @@ static int ctucan_open(struct net_device *ndev)
> > goto err_chip_start;
> > }
> >
> > + if (priv->timestamp_possible)
> > + ctucan_timestamp_init(priv);
> > +
>
> This is racy. You have to init the timestamping before the start of the
> chip, i.e. enabling the IRQs. I had the same problem with the gs_usb
> driver:
>
> | https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220921081329.385509-1-mkl@pengutronix.de
Thanks for pointing this out, I'll fix this.
>
> > netdev_info(ndev, "ctu_can_fd device registered\n");
> > napi_enable(&priv->napi);
> > netif_start_queue(ndev);
> > @@ -1262,6 +1306,8 @@ static int ctucan_close(struct net_device *ndev)
> > ctucan_chip_stop(ndev);
> > free_irq(ndev->irq, ndev);
> > close_candev(ndev);
> > + if (priv->timestamp_possible)
> > + ctucan_timestamp_stop(priv);
>
> Can you make this symmetric with respect to the ctucan_open() function.
Yes, will do.
> >
> > pm_runtime_put(priv->dev);
> >
> > @@ -1294,15 +1340,88 @@ static int ctucan_get_berr_counter(const struct net_device *ndev, struct can_ber
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> [...]
>
> > @@ -1385,15 +1534,29 @@ int ctucan_probe_common(struct device *dev, void __iomem *addr, int irq, unsigne
> >
> > /* Getting the can_clk info */
> > if (!can_clk_rate) {
> > - priv->can_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
> > + priv->can_clk = devm_clk_get_optional(dev, "core");
> > + if (!priv->can_clk)
> > + /* For compatibility with (older) device trees without clock-names */
> > + priv->can_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
> > if (IS_ERR(priv->can_clk)) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "Device clock not found.\n");
> > + dev_err(dev, "Device clock not found: %pe.\n", priv->can_clk);
> > ret = PTR_ERR(priv->can_clk);
> > goto err_free;
> > }
> > can_clk_rate = clk_get_rate(priv->can_clk);
> > }
> >
> > + if (!timestamp_clk_rate) {
> > + priv->timestamp_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "ts");
> > + if (IS_ERR(priv->timestamp_clk)) {
> > + /* Take the core clock instead */
> > + dev_info(dev, "Failed to get ts clk\n");
> > + priv->timestamp_clk = priv->can_clk;
> > + }
> > + clk_prepare_enable(priv->timestamp_clk);
> > + timestamp_clk_rate = clk_get_rate(priv->timestamp_clk);
> > + }
> > +
> > priv->write_reg = ctucan_write32_le;
> > priv->read_reg = ctucan_read32_le;
> >
> > @@ -1424,6 +1587,50 @@ int ctucan_probe_common(struct device *dev, void __iomem *addr, int irq, unsigne
> >
> > priv->can.clock.freq = can_clk_rate;
> >
> > + /* Obtain timestamping counter bit size */
> > + timestamp_bit_size = FIELD_GET(REG_ERR_CAPT_TS_BITS,
> > + ctucan_read32(priv, CTUCANFD_ERR_CAPT));
> > +
> > + /* The register value is actually bit_size - 1 */
> > + if (timestamp_bit_size) {
> > + timestamp_bit_size += 1;
> > + } else {
> > + /* For 2.x versions of the IP core, we will assume 64-bit counter
> > + * if there was a 0 in the register.
> > + */
> > + u32 version_reg = ctucan_read32(priv, CTUCANFD_DEVICE_ID);
> > + u32 major = FIELD_GET(REG_DEVICE_ID_VER_MAJOR, version_reg);
> > +
> > + if (major == 2)
> > + timestamp_bit_size = 64;
> > + else
> > + priv->timestamp_possible = false;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Setup conversion constants and work delay */
> > + if (priv->timestamp_possible) {
> > + u64 max_cycles;
> > + u64 work_delay_ns;
> > + u32 maxsec;
> > +
> > + priv->cc.read = ctucan_read_timestamp_cc_wrapper;
> > + priv->cc.mask = CYCLECOUNTER_MASK(timestamp_bit_size);
> > + maxsec = min_t(u32, CTUCANFD_MAX_WORK_DELAY_SEC,
> > + div_u64(priv->cc.mask, timestamp_clk_rate));
> > + clocks_calc_mult_shift(&priv->cc.mult, &priv->cc.shift,
> > + timestamp_clk_rate, NSEC_PER_SEC, maxsec);
> > +
> > + /* shortened copy of clocks_calc_max_nsecs() */
> > + max_cycles = div_u64(ULLONG_MAX, priv->cc.mult);
> > + max_cycles = min(max_cycles, priv->cc.mask);
> > + work_delay_ns = clocksource_cyc2ns(max_cycles, priv->cc.mult,
> > + priv->cc.shift) >> 2;
>
> I think we can use cyclecounter_cyc2ns() for this, see:
>
> | https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.0.3/source/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpts.c#L642
>
> BTW: This is the only networking driver using clocks_calc_mult_shift()
> (so far) :D
>
I don't really see the benefit at the moment (I have to include
clocksource.h anyway due to the clocks_calc_mult_shift()), but sure,
I'll use cyclecounter_cyc2ns().
Fun fact :-D I might look into the cpts.c
> > + priv->work_delay_jiffies = nsecs_to_jiffies(work_delay_ns);
> > +
> > + if (priv->work_delay_jiffies == 0)
> > + priv->timestamp_possible = false;
> > + }
> > +
>
> regards,
> Marc
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde |
> Embedded Linux | https://www.pengutronix.de |
> Vertretung West/Dortmund | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Mail 2:
>Regarding the timestamp_clk handling:
>
>If you prepare_enable the timestamp_clk during probe_common() and don't
>disable_unprepare it, it stays on the whole lifetime of the driver. So
>there's no need/reason for the runtime suspend/resume functions.
>
>So either keep the clock powered and remove the suspend/resume functions
>or shut down the clock after probe.
>
>If you want to make things 1000% clean, you can get the timestamp's
>clock rate during open() and re-calculate the mult and shift. The
>background is that the clock rate might change if the clock is not
>enabled (at least that's not guaranteed by the common clock framework).
>Actual HW implementations might differ.
Hmm, I thought that pm_runtime_put() will eventually run runtime suspend
callback, but now I see that it will run only the idle callback (which
I haven't defined).
I'll remove the runtime suspend/resume callbacks.
Best regards,
Matej
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-25 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-12 6:25 [PATCH v5 0/4] can: ctucanfd: hardware rx timestamps reporting Matej Vasilevski
2022-10-12 6:25 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: can: ctucanfd: add another clock for HW timestamping Matej Vasilevski
2022-10-12 16:21 ` Rob Herring
2022-10-12 6:25 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] can: ctucanfd: add HW timestamps to RX and error CAN frames Matej Vasilevski
2022-10-16 21:54 ` Pavel Pisa
2022-10-17 12:11 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-10-24 20:02 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-10-25 22:22 ` Matej Vasilevski [this message]
2022-10-26 7:15 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-10-25 8:18 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-10-25 9:25 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-10-12 6:25 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] doc: ctucanfd: RX frames timestamping for platform devices Matej Vasilevski
2022-10-12 6:25 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] can: ctucanfd: remove __maybe_unused from suspend/resume callbacks Matej Vasilevski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221025222237.GA4635@hopium \
--to=matej.vasilevski@seznam.cz \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ondrej.ille@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).