netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] netlink: introduce NLA_POLICY_MAX_BE
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 13:31:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221027133109.590bd74f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220905100937.11459-2-fw@strlen.de>

On Mon,  5 Sep 2022 12:09:36 +0200 Florian Westphal wrote:
>  		struct {
>  			s16 min, max;
> +			u8 network_byte_order:1;
>  		};

This makes the union 64bit even on 32bit systems.
Do we care? Should we accept that and start using
full 64bits in other validation members?

We can quite easily steal a bit elsewhere, which
I reckon may be the right thing to do, but I thought
I'd ask.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-27 20:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-05 10:09 [PATCH net-next 0/2] netlink: add range checks for network byte integers Florian Westphal
2022-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH net-next 1/2] netlink: introduce NLA_POLICY_MAX_BE Florian Westphal
2022-10-27 20:31   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-10-27 20:36     ` Johannes Berg
2022-10-27 23:35       ` Florian Westphal
2022-10-28  2:39         ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-10-28 10:16           ` Florian Westphal
2022-10-28 16:13             ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-09-05 10:09 ` [PATCH net-next 2/2] netfilter: nft_payload: reject out-of-range attributes via policy Florian Westphal
2022-09-07 11:40 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] netlink: add range checks for network byte integers patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221027133109.590bd74f@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).