From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, corbet@lwn.net, michael.chan@broadcom.com,
hkallweit1@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
huangguangbin2@huawei.com, chenhao288@hisilicon.com,
moshet@nvidia.com, linux@rempel-privat.de,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] ethtool: linkstate: add a statistic for PHY down events
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 09:20:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221028092047.45fa3d19@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y1vIg8bR8NBnQ3J5@lunn.ch>
On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 14:18:11 +0200 Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static void phy_link_down(struct phy_device *phydev)
> > {
> > phydev->phy_link_change(phydev, false);
> > phy_led_trigger_change_speed(phydev);
> > + WRITE_ONCE(phydev->link_down_events, phydev->link_down_events + 1);
>
> I'm not sure the WRITE_ONCE adds much value. Many systems using PHYLIB
> are 32 bit, and i don't think WRITE_ONCE will make that 64 bit write
> atomic on 32 bit systems. And as Florian pointed out, you have bigger
> problems if you manged to overflow a u32 into a u64.
>
> > @@ -723,6 +724,8 @@ struct phy_device {
> >
> > int pma_extable;
> >
> > + unsigned int link_down_events;
>
> And here is unsigned int, not u64? Or u32? It would be good to be
> consistent.
I made it 32b on the phylib side so that WRITE_ONCE() was sufficient
to ensure atomic writes.
Do you have a preference for it being 64b vs 32b at the uAPI level?
I was leaning slightly towards making both 32b in v3..
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/ethtool_netlink.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/ethtool_netlink.h
> > @@ -262,6 +262,8 @@ enum {
> > ETHTOOL_A_LINKSTATE_SQI_MAX, /* u32 */
> > ETHTOOL_A_LINKSTATE_EXT_STATE, /* u8 */
> > ETHTOOL_A_LINKSTATE_EXT_SUBSTATE, /* u8 */
> > + ETHTOOL_A_LINKSTATE_PAD,
> > + ETHTOOL_A_LINKSTATE_EXT_DOWN_CNT, /* u64 */
>
> What is the PAD for?
64b values have to be padded in netlink to ensure alignment.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-28 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-28 1:27 [PATCH net-next v2] ethtool: linkstate: add a statistic for PHY down events Jakub Kicinski
2022-10-28 2:50 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-10-28 3:08 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-10-28 12:18 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-10-28 16:20 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-10-28 22:09 ` Andrew Lunn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221028092047.45fa3d19@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=chenhao288@hisilicon.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=huangguangbin2@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=linux@rempel-privat.de \
--cc=michael.chan@broadcom.com \
--cc=moshet@nvidia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).