From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D4BC433FE for ; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 07:53:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229799AbiJ2Hxr (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2022 03:53:47 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56084 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229647AbiJ2Hxo (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2022 03:53:44 -0400 Received: from out2.migadu.com (out2.migadu.com [188.165.223.204]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C4C972B5A; Sat, 29 Oct 2022 00:53:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 15:53:35 +0800 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Cai Huoqing To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Zhengchao Shao , Bin Chen , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Peter Chen , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: hinic: Add control command support for VF PMD driver in DPDK Message-ID: <20221029075335.GA9148@chq-T47> References: <20221026125922.34080-1-cai.huoqing@linux.dev> <20221026125922.34080-2-cai.huoqing@linux.dev> <20221027110312.7391f69f@kernel.org> <20221028045655.GB3164@chq-T47> <20221028085651.78408e2c@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20221028085651.78408e2c@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On 28 10月 22 08:56:51, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 12:56:55 +0800 Cai Huoqing wrote: > > > The commands are actually supported or you're just ignoring them > > > silently? > > No, > > Do you mean "neither"? > > > if the cmd is not added to 'nic_cmd_support_vf', > > the PF will return false, and the error messsage "PF Receive VFx > > unsupported cmd x" in the function 'hinic_mbox_check_cmd_valid', > > then, the configuration will not be set to hardware. > > You're describing the behavior before the patch? > > After the patch the command is ignored silently, like I said, right? > Because there is no handler added to nic_vf_cmd_msg_handler[]. > Why is that okay? Or is there handler somewhere else? No need to add handlers to nic_vf_cmd_msg_handler[]. It will run the path, if (i == ARRAY_SIZE(nic_vf_cmd_msg_handler)) err = hinic_msg_to_mgmt(&pfhwdev->pf_to_mgmt, HINIC_MOD_L2NIC, cmd, buf_in, in_size, buf_out, out_size, HINIC_MGMT_MSG_SYNC); right? or if not please show the related code.