From: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com>
To: Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>, willemb@google.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Tomas Hruby <tomas@tigera.io>,
Jeremi Piotrowski <jpiotrowski@linux.microsoft.com>,
alexanderduyck@meta.com, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: gso: fix panic on frag_list with mixed head alloc types
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2022 10:41:31 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221029104131.07fbc6cf@blondie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559cea869928e169240d74c386735f3f95beca32.1666858629.git.jbenc@redhat.com>
On Thu, 27 Oct 2022 10:20:56 +0200
Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com> wrote:
> It turns out this assumption does not hold. We've seen BUG_ON being hit
> in skb_segment when skbs on the frag_list had differing head_frag. That
> particular case was with vmxnet3; looking at the driver, it indeed uses
> different skb allocation strategies based on the packet size. The last
> packet in frag_list can thus be kmalloced if it is sufficiently small.
> And there's nothing preventing drivers from mixing things even more
> freely.
Hi Jiri,
One of my early attempts to fix the original BUG was to also detect:
> - some frag in the frag_list has a linear part that is NOT head_frag,
> or length not equal to the requested gso_size
See [0], see skb_is_nonlinear_equal_frags() there
(Note that your current suggestion implements the "some frag in the
frag_list has a linear part that is NOT head_frag" condition, but not
"length not equal to the requested gso_size")
As a response, Willem suggested:
> My suggestion only tested the first frag_skb length. If a list can be
> created where the first frag_skb is head_frag but a later one is not,
> it will fail short. I kind of doubt that.
See [1]
So we eventually concluded testing just
!list_skb->head_frag && skb_headlen(list_skb)
and not every frag in frag_list.
Maybe Willem can elaborate on that.
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20190903185121.56906d31@pixies/
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CA+FuTScE=pyopY=3f5E4JGx1zyGqT+XS+8ss13UN4if4TZ2NbA@mail.gmail.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-29 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-27 8:20 [PATCH net] net: gso: fix panic on frag_list with mixed head alloc types Jiri Benc
2022-10-29 4:41 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-10-31 15:54 ` Jiri Benc
2022-10-29 7:41 ` Shmulik Ladkani [this message]
2022-10-29 14:10 ` Willem de Bruijn
2022-10-31 16:52 ` Jiri Benc
2022-10-31 21:16 ` Willem de Bruijn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221029104131.07fbc6cf@blondie \
--to=shmulik.ladkani@gmail.com \
--cc=alexanderduyck@meta.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=jpiotrowski@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tomas@tigera.io \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).