netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
Cc: edward.cree@amd.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-net-drivers@amd.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] sfc: check recirc_id match caps before MAE offload
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 08:50:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221101085034.44b94d10@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <279a6644-4f3e-2ef3-2aa4-4463fbb9b8fc@gmail.com>

On Tue, 1 Nov 2022 15:41:13 +0000 Edward Cree wrote:
> > Can you describe the current behavior is? Isn't the driver accepting
> > rules it can't correctly offload?  
> 
> The rule will pass the checks here, but then when we make the MCDI call
>  to install it in hardware, MC_CMD_MAE_ACTION_RULE_INSERT will evoke an
>  error response from the firmware, so the TC_SETUP_CLSFLOWER callback
>  will ultimately return an error to the kernel as it should.
> The advantage of having these checks in the driver is that we get a
>  useful error message rather than just "Failed to insert rule in hw",
>  and also save the round trip across the PCIe bus to firmware.

I see, net-next sounds good then. Do put this info into the commit
message, please.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-01 15:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-24  9:29 [PATCH net-next 0/5] sfc: add basic flower matches to offload edward.cree
2022-10-24  9:29 ` [PATCH net-next 1/5] sfc: check recirc_id match caps before MAE offload edward.cree
2022-10-26  2:40   ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-01 13:30     ` Edward Cree
2022-11-01 15:21       ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-01 15:41         ` Edward Cree
2022-11-01 15:50           ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-10-24  9:29 ` [PATCH net-next 2/5] sfc: add Layer 2 matches to ef100 TC offload edward.cree
2022-10-24  9:29 ` [PATCH net-next 3/5] sfc: add Layer 3 " edward.cree
2022-10-24  9:29 ` [PATCH net-next 4/5] sfc: add Layer 3 flag " edward.cree
2022-10-24  9:29 ` [PATCH net-next 5/5] sfc: add Layer 4 " edward.cree

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221101085034.44b94d10@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ecree.xilinx@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=edward.cree@amd.com \
    --cc=habetsm.xilinx@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-net-drivers@amd.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).