netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: "Ruhl, Michael J" <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Cc: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	"Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
	<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] igb: Proactively round up to kmalloc bucket size
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 14:37:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202211011433.A64BF17F46@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM5PR11MB1324802F3F2098CB3239CF36C1379@DM5PR11MB1324.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 08:42:36PM +0000, Ruhl, Michael J wrote:
> Looking at the size usage (from elixir), I see:
> 
> --
> 	if (!q_vector) {
> 		q_vector = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> 	} else if (size > ksize(q_vector)) {
> 		kfree_rcu(q_vector, rcu);
> 		q_vector = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> 	} else {
> 		memset(q_vector, 0, size);
> 	}
> --
> 
> If the size is rounded up, will the (size > ksize()) check ever be true?
> 
> I.e. have you eliminated this check (and maybe getting rid of the need for first patch?)?

Hi!

It looked like igb_alloc_q_vector() was designed to be called multiple
times on the same q_vector (i.e. to grow its allocation size over time).
So for that case, yes, the "size > ksize(q_vector)" check is needed. If
it's only ever called once (which is hard for me to tell), then no. (And
if "no", why was the alloc/free case even there in the first place?)

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-01 21:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-18  9:25 [PATCH v3 0/2] igb: Proactively round up to kmalloc bucket size Kees Cook
2022-10-18  9:25 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] igb: Do not free q_vector unless new one was allocated Kees Cook
2022-10-18 12:20   ` Ruhl, Michael J
2022-10-29  3:29   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " G, GurucharanX
2022-10-18  9:25 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] igb: Proactively round up to kmalloc bucket size Kees Cook
2022-10-29  3:17   ` Kees Cook
2022-10-31 20:42     ` Ruhl, Michael J
2022-11-01 21:37       ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-11-02 14:12         ` Ruhl, Michael J
2022-10-29  3:30   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " G, GurucharanX
2022-10-18 10:09 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202211011433.A64BF17F46@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michael.j.ruhl@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).