From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
jiri@resnulli.us, razor@blackwall.org, nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com,
gnault@redhat.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com, fw@strlen.de,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 09/13] genetlink: add iterator for walking family ops
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2022 14:33:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221102213338.194672-10-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221102213338.194672-1-kuba@kernel.org>
Subsequent changes will expose split op structures to users,
so walking the family ops with just an index will get harder.
Add a structured iterator, convert the simple cases.
Policy dumping needs more careful conversion.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
net/netlink/genetlink.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 76 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netlink/genetlink.c b/net/netlink/genetlink.c
index ec32b6063a3f..06bf091c1b8a 100644
--- a/net/netlink/genetlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/genetlink.c
@@ -252,6 +252,57 @@ static void genl_get_cmd_by_index(unsigned int i,
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
}
+struct genl_op_iter {
+ const struct genl_family *family;
+ struct genl_split_ops doit;
+ struct genl_split_ops dumpit;
+ int i;
+ u32 cmd;
+ u8 flags;
+};
+
+static bool
+genl_op_iter_init(const struct genl_family *family, struct genl_op_iter *iter)
+{
+ iter->family = family;
+ iter->i = 0;
+
+ iter->flags = 0;
+
+ return genl_get_cmd_cnt(iter->family);
+}
+
+static bool genl_op_iter_next(struct genl_op_iter *iter)
+{
+ struct genl_ops op;
+
+ if (iter->i >= genl_get_cmd_cnt(iter->family))
+ return false;
+
+ genl_get_cmd_by_index(iter->i, iter->family, &op);
+ iter->i++;
+
+ genl_cmd_full_to_split(&iter->doit, iter->family, &op, GENL_CMD_CAP_DO);
+ genl_cmd_full_to_split(&iter->dumpit, iter->family,
+ &op, GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMP);
+
+ iter->cmd = iter->doit.cmd | iter->dumpit.cmd;
+ iter->flags = iter->doit.flags | iter->dumpit.flags;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
+static void
+genl_op_iter_copy(struct genl_op_iter *dst, struct genl_op_iter *src)
+{
+ *dst = *src;
+}
+
+static unsigned int genl_op_iter_idx(struct genl_op_iter *iter)
+{
+ return iter->i;
+}
+
static int genl_allocate_reserve_groups(int n_groups, int *first_id)
{
unsigned long *new_groups;
@@ -419,25 +470,23 @@ static void genl_unregister_mc_groups(const struct genl_family *family)
static int genl_validate_ops(const struct genl_family *family)
{
- int i, j;
+ struct genl_op_iter i, j;
if (WARN_ON(family->n_ops && !family->ops) ||
WARN_ON(family->n_small_ops && !family->small_ops))
return -EINVAL;
- for (i = 0; i < genl_get_cmd_cnt(family); i++) {
- struct genl_ops op;
-
- genl_get_cmd_by_index(i, family, &op);
- if (op.dumpit == NULL && op.doit == NULL)
+ for (genl_op_iter_init(family, &i); genl_op_iter_next(&i); ) {
+ if (!(i.flags & (GENL_CMD_CAP_DO | GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMP)))
return -EINVAL;
- if (WARN_ON(op.cmd >= family->resv_start_op && op.validate))
+
+ if (WARN_ON(i.cmd >= family->resv_start_op &&
+ (i.doit.validate || i.dumpit.validate)))
return -EINVAL;
- for (j = i + 1; j < genl_get_cmd_cnt(family); j++) {
- struct genl_ops op2;
- genl_get_cmd_by_index(j, family, &op2);
- if (op.cmd == op2.cmd)
+ genl_op_iter_copy(&j, &i);
+ while (genl_op_iter_next(&j)) {
+ if (i.cmd == j.cmd)
return -EINVAL;
}
}
@@ -917,6 +966,7 @@ static struct genl_family genl_ctrl;
static int ctrl_fill_info(const struct genl_family *family, u32 portid, u32 seq,
u32 flags, struct sk_buff *skb, u8 cmd)
{
+ struct genl_op_iter i;
void *hdr;
hdr = genlmsg_put(skb, portid, seq, &genl_ctrl, flags, cmd);
@@ -930,33 +980,26 @@ static int ctrl_fill_info(const struct genl_family *family, u32 portid, u32 seq,
nla_put_u32(skb, CTRL_ATTR_MAXATTR, family->maxattr))
goto nla_put_failure;
- if (genl_get_cmd_cnt(family)) {
+ if (genl_op_iter_init(family, &i)) {
struct nlattr *nla_ops;
- int i;
nla_ops = nla_nest_start_noflag(skb, CTRL_ATTR_OPS);
if (nla_ops == NULL)
goto nla_put_failure;
- for (i = 0; i < genl_get_cmd_cnt(family); i++) {
+ while (genl_op_iter_next(&i)) {
struct nlattr *nest;
- struct genl_ops op;
u32 op_flags;
- genl_get_cmd_by_index(i, family, &op);
- op_flags = op.flags;
- if (op.dumpit)
- op_flags |= GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMP;
- if (op.doit)
- op_flags |= GENL_CMD_CAP_DO;
- if (op.policy)
+ op_flags = i.flags;
+ if (i.doit.policy || i.dumpit.policy)
op_flags |= GENL_CMD_CAP_HASPOL;
- nest = nla_nest_start_noflag(skb, i + 1);
+ nest = nla_nest_start_noflag(skb, genl_op_iter_idx(&i));
if (nest == NULL)
goto nla_put_failure;
- if (nla_put_u32(skb, CTRL_ATTR_OP_ID, op.cmd) ||
+ if (nla_put_u32(skb, CTRL_ATTR_OP_ID, i.cmd) ||
nla_put_u32(skb, CTRL_ATTR_OP_FLAGS, op_flags))
goto nla_put_failure;
@@ -1229,8 +1272,8 @@ static int ctrl_dumppolicy_start(struct netlink_callback *cb)
struct ctrl_dump_policy_ctx *ctx = (void *)cb->ctx;
struct nlattr **tb = info->attrs;
const struct genl_family *rt;
- struct genl_ops op;
- int err, i;
+ struct genl_op_iter i;
+ int err;
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*ctx) > sizeof(cb->ctx));
@@ -1285,26 +1328,18 @@ static int ctrl_dumppolicy_start(struct netlink_callback *cb)
return 0;
}
- for (i = 0; i < genl_get_cmd_cnt(rt); i++) {
- struct genl_split_ops doit, dumpit;
-
- genl_get_cmd_by_index(i, rt, &op);
-
- genl_cmd_full_to_split(&doit, ctx->rt, &op, GENL_CMD_CAP_DO);
- genl_cmd_full_to_split(&dumpit, ctx->rt,
- &op, GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMP);
-
- if (doit.policy) {
+ for (genl_op_iter_init(rt, &i); genl_op_iter_next(&i); ) {
+ if (i.doit.policy) {
err = netlink_policy_dump_add_policy(&ctx->state,
- doit.policy,
- doit.maxattr);
+ i.doit.policy,
+ i.doit.maxattr);
if (err)
goto err_free_state;
}
- if (dumpit.policy) {
+ if (i.dumpit.policy) {
err = netlink_policy_dump_add_policy(&ctx->state,
- dumpit.policy,
- dumpit.maxattr);
+ i.dumpit.policy,
+ i.dumpit.maxattr);
if (err)
goto err_free_state;
}
--
2.38.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-02 21:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-02 21:33 [PATCH net-next v2 00/13] genetlink: support per op type policies Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 01/13] genetlink: refactor the cmd <> policy mapping dump Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02 23:52 ` Jacob Keller
2022-11-03 1:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-03 3:06 ` Keller, Jacob E
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 02/13] genetlink: move the private fields in struct genl_family Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 03/13] genetlink: introduce split op representation Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 04/13] genetlink: load policy based on validation flags Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 05/13] genetlink: check for callback type at op load time Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 06/13] genetlink: add policies for both doit and dumpit in ctrl_dumppolicy_start() Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-03 17:38 ` Jacob Keller
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 07/13] genetlink: support split policies in ctrl_dumppolicy_put_op() Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 08/13] genetlink: inline genl_get_cmd() Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-03 17:04 ` Jacob Keller
2022-11-02 21:33 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 10/13] genetlink: use iterator in the op to policy map dumping Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 11/13] genetlink: inline old iteration helpers Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 12/13] genetlink: allow families to use split ops directly Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-04 22:10 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2022-11-04 22:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-04 22:28 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2022-11-02 21:33 ` [PATCH net-next v2 13/13] genetlink: convert control family to split ops Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-03 17:09 ` [PATCH net-next v2 00/13] genetlink: support per op type policies Jacob Keller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221102213338.194672-10-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=razor@blackwall.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).