netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Jonathan Lemon <bsd@meta.com>,
	jacob.e.keller@intel.com, leon@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v2] genetlink: fix single op policy dump when do is present
Date: Wed,  9 Nov 2022 10:32:54 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221109183254.554051-1-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)

Jonathan reports crashes when running net-next in Meta's fleet.
Stats collection uses ethtool -I which does a per-op policy dump
to check if stats are supported. We don't initialize the dumpit
information if doit succeeds due to evaluation short-circuiting.

The crash may look like this:

   BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000cc0
   RIP: 0010:netlink_policy_dump_add_policy+0x174/0x2a0
     ctrl_dumppolicy_start+0x19f/0x2f0
     genl_start+0xe7/0x140

Or we may trigger a warning:

   WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 785 at net/netlink/policy.c:87 netlink_policy_dump_get_policy_idx+0x79/0x80
   RIP: 0010:netlink_policy_dump_get_policy_idx+0x79/0x80
     ctrl_dumppolicy_put_op+0x214/0x360

depending on what garbage we pick up from the stack.

Reported-by: Jonathan Lemon <bsd@meta.com>
Fixes: 26588edbef60 ("genetlink: support split policies in ctrl_dumppolicy_put_op()")
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
CC: jacob.e.keller@intel.com
CC: leon@kernel.org

v2:
 - add a helper instead of doing magic sums
 - improve title
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221108204041.330172-1-kuba@kernel.org/
---
 net/netlink/genetlink.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/netlink/genetlink.c b/net/netlink/genetlink.c
index 9b7dfc45dd67..600993c80050 100644
--- a/net/netlink/genetlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/genetlink.c
@@ -282,6 +282,7 @@ genl_cmd_full_to_split(struct genl_split_ops *op,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/* Must make sure that op is initialized to 0 on failure */
 static int
 genl_get_cmd(u32 cmd, u8 flags, const struct genl_family *family,
 	     struct genl_split_ops *op)
@@ -302,6 +303,21 @@ genl_get_cmd(u32 cmd, u8 flags, const struct genl_family *family,
 	return err;
 }
 
+/* For policy dumping only, get ops of both do and dump.
+ * Fail if both are missing, genl_get_cmd() will zero-init in case of failure.
+ */
+static int
+genl_get_cmd_both(u32 cmd, const struct genl_family *family,
+		  struct genl_split_ops *doit, struct genl_split_ops *dumpit)
+{
+	int err1, err2;
+
+	err1 = genl_get_cmd(cmd, GENL_CMD_CAP_DO, family, doit);
+	err2 = genl_get_cmd(cmd, GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMP, family, dumpit);
+
+	return err1 && err2 ? -ENOENT : 0;
+}
+
 static bool
 genl_op_iter_init(const struct genl_family *family, struct genl_op_iter *iter)
 {
@@ -1406,10 +1422,10 @@ static int ctrl_dumppolicy_start(struct netlink_callback *cb)
 		ctx->single_op = true;
 		ctx->op = nla_get_u32(tb[CTRL_ATTR_OP]);
 
-		if (genl_get_cmd(ctx->op, GENL_CMD_CAP_DO, rt, &doit) &&
-		    genl_get_cmd(ctx->op, GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMP, rt, &dump)) {
+		err = genl_get_cmd_both(ctx->op, rt, &doit, &dump);
+		if (err) {
 			NL_SET_BAD_ATTR(cb->extack, tb[CTRL_ATTR_OP]);
-			return -ENOENT;
+			return err;
 		}
 
 		if (doit.policy) {
@@ -1551,13 +1567,9 @@ static int ctrl_dumppolicy(struct sk_buff *skb, struct netlink_callback *cb)
 		if (ctx->single_op) {
 			struct genl_split_ops doit, dumpit;
 
-			if (genl_get_cmd(ctx->op, GENL_CMD_CAP_DO,
-					 ctx->rt, &doit) &&
-			    genl_get_cmd(ctx->op, GENL_CMD_CAP_DUMP,
-					 ctx->rt, &dumpit)) {
-				WARN_ON(1);
+			if (WARN_ON(genl_get_cmd_both(ctx->op, ctx->rt,
+						      &doit, &dumpit)))
 				return -ENOENT;
-			}
 
 			if (ctrl_dumppolicy_put_op(skb, cb, &doit, &dumpit))
 				return skb->len;
-- 
2.38.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-11-09 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-09 18:32 Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-11-09 20:05 ` [PATCH net-next v2] genetlink: fix single op policy dump when do is present Keller, Jacob E
2022-11-10  9:36 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-10 22:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221109183254.554051-1-kuba@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=bsd@meta.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).