From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>
Cc: "Mogilappagari, Sudheer" <sudheer.mogilappagari@intel.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"mkubecek@suse.cz" <mkubecek@suse.cz>,
"andrew@lunn.ch" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
"corbet@lwn.net" <corbet@lwn.net>,
"Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] ethtool: add netlink based get rxfh support
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 09:15:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221114091559.7e24c7de@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c40e7ed0-1118-168b-7fdc-a833b461b918@intel.com>
On Sun, 13 Nov 2022 22:23:25 -0600 Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
> > My worry is that if we go with a more broad name like
> > "queue group" someone may be mislead to adding controls
> > unrelated to flow <> queue assignment here.
>
> Later we would like to add a per queue-group parameter that would allow
> reducing/changing the number of napi pollers for a queue group from the default
> value equal to the number of queues in the queue group. Are you suggesting
> creating a queue-group object and use devlink API to configure such parameters
> for a queue-group?
I was thinking devlink because of scheduler/QoS and resource control.
For NAPI config not so sure, but either way RSS will not be a place
for NAPI/IRQ config.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-14 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-04 23:42 [PATCH net-next v2] ethtool: add netlink based get rxfh support Sudheer Mogilappagari
2022-11-08 2:25 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-10 0:26 ` Mogilappagari, Sudheer
2022-11-10 0:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-10 22:08 ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2022-11-10 22:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-10 23:24 ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2022-11-11 0:12 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-14 4:23 ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2022-11-14 17:15 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-11-15 1:46 ` Samudrala, Sridhar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221114091559.7e24c7de@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
--cc=sudheer.mogilappagari@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).