From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>,
David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
pabeni@redhat.com, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] netlink: split up copies in the ack construction
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 14:35:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202211171431.6C8675E2@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221117123615.41d9c71a@kernel.org>
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 12:36:15PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 08:25:56 -0800 Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > I was asking based on your own commit 1e6e9d0f4859 ("uapi: revert
> > > flexible-array conversions"). This is uAPI as well.
> >
> > Some of the flex-array conversions fixed build warnings that occur in
> > iproute2 when using Gcc 12 or later.
>
> Alright, this is getting complicated. I'll post a patch to fix
> the issue I've added and gently place my head back into the sand.
Thanks! I think the path forward is clear. I should not have suggested
adding a flex-array member to the "header" struct lo these many moons
ago. You and Gustavo are right: we need a separate struct with the header
at the beginning, just as iproute2 is doing itself.
As for testing, I can do that if you want -- the goal was to make sure
the final result doesn't trip FORTIFY when built with -fstrict-flex-arrays
(not yet in a released compiler version, but present in both GCC and Clang
truck builds) and with __builtin_dynamic_object_size() enabled (which
is not yet in -next, as it is waiting on the last of ksize() clean-ups).
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-17 22:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-27 21:25 [PATCH net-next v2] netlink: split up copies in the ack construction Jakub Kicinski
2022-10-31 9:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2022-11-14 2:39 ` David Ahern
2022-11-14 17:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-16 22:53 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-16 22:56 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-17 0:27 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-17 0:55 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2022-11-17 1:05 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-17 1:20 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2022-11-17 6:13 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-17 16:25 ` Stephen Hemminger
2022-11-17 20:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-17 22:35 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2022-11-18 0:28 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-18 3:27 ` Kees Cook
2022-11-18 15:59 ` David Ahern
2022-11-18 2:37 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202211171431.6C8675E2@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gustavo@embeddedor.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).