From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
Cc: jasowang@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: Fix probe failed when modprobe virtio_net
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2022 12:45:51 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221121123438-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221121132935.2032325-1-lizetao1@huawei.com>
On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 09:29:35PM +0800, Li Zetao wrote:
> When doing the following test steps, an error was found:
> step 1: modprobe virtio_net succeeded
> # modprobe virtio_net <-- OK
>
> step 2: fault injection in register_netdevice()
> # modprobe -r virtio_net <-- OK
> # ...
> FAULT_INJECTION: forcing a failure.
> name failslab, interval 1, probability 0, space 0, times 0
> CPU: 0 PID: 3521 Comm: modprobe
> Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> ...
> should_failslab+0xa/0x20
> ...
> dev_set_name+0xc0/0x100
> netdev_register_kobject+0xc2/0x340
> register_netdevice+0xbb9/0x1320
> virtnet_probe+0x1d72/0x2658 [virtio_net]
> ...
> </TASK>
> virtio_net: probe of virtio0 failed with error -22
>
> step 3: modprobe virtio_net failed
> # modprobe virtio_net <-- failed
> virtio_net: probe of virtio0 failed with error -2
>
> The root cause of the problem is that the queues are not
> disable on the error handling path when register_netdevice()
> fails in virtnet_probe(), resulting in an error "-ENOENT"
> returned in the next modprobe call in setup_vq().
>
> virtio_pci_modern_device uses virtqueues to send or
> receive message, and "queue_enable" records whether the
> queues are available. In vp_modern_find_vqs(), all queues
> will be selected and activated, but once queues are enabled
> there is no way to go back except reset.
>
> Fix it by reset virtio device on error handling path.
>
> Fixes: 1fcf0512c9c8 ("virtio_pci: modern driver")
> Signed-off-by: Li Zetao <lizetao1@huawei.com>
I would add to this:
------
This makes error handling follow the same order as normal device cleanup
which does:
static void remove_vq_common(struct virtnet_info *vi)
{
virtio_reset_device(vi->vdev);
/* Free unused buffers in both send and recv, if any. */
free_unused_bufs(vi);
free_receive_bufs(vi);
free_receive_page_frags(vi);
virtnet_del_vqs(vi);
}
static void virtnet_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
{
struct virtnet_info *vi = vdev->priv;
virtnet_cpu_notif_remove(vi);
/* Make sure no work handler is accessing the device. */
flush_work(&vi->config_work);
unregister_netdev(vi->dev);
net_failover_destroy(vi->failover);
remove_vq_common(vi);
free_netdev(vi->dev);
}
So unregister, destroy failover, then reset - and that flow
is better tested than error handling so we can be reasonably
sure it works well.
-----
I would thus probably also include this tag instead:
Fixes: 0246555550 ("virtio_net: fix use after free on allocation failure")
this is what introduced the difference in cleanup order,
modern driver just added hardware support.
Besides extending the commit log
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 7106932c6f88..86e52454b5b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -3949,12 +3949,11 @@ static int virtnet_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> return 0;
>
> free_unregister_netdev:
> - virtio_reset_device(vdev);
> -
> unregister_netdev(dev);
> free_failover:
> net_failover_destroy(vi->failover);
> free_vqs:
> + virtio_reset_device(vdev);
> cancel_delayed_work_sync(&vi->refill);
> free_receive_page_frags(vi);
> virtnet_del_vqs(vi);
> --
> 2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-21 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-21 13:29 [PATCH] virtio_net: Fix probe failed when modprobe virtio_net Li Zetao
2022-11-21 17:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2022-11-22 15:00 ` [PATCH v2] " Li Zetao
2022-11-22 20:06 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-11-24 8:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221121123438-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizetao1@huawei.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).