From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C56C4332F for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 18:40:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234016AbiKVSkS (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2022 13:40:18 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45036 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233081AbiKVSkO (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Nov 2022 13:40:14 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19C737FF01 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:40:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6C086182F for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 18:40:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C0308C433D7; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 18:40:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1669142413; bh=Okg7sTJ3HQqgRqkB/KVgBNeC0O9D+9OAcIegz3edsmw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=OvH8/Up1HlsAQJM3o8LUKbgsO6mW7yLHCVHKURRkCd4T0agcx9OhiTp1N/BEh1nWg hn7YXBMwdU2eldsGYfYOr853vkVSmRub/BZuJDKKlYCENXmqy2PpSpujAV+Z5nLrac rfZAoVsgkwVCYMCjBOXIC9e0VD7SF+oxAwRPNKEIqD4xKN4f4CIwW33Yh0fgzBgl51 PlUc42TSXqLia4dd52pHxmm0/yTtOf5QKS34JdsPj1QBLviEHDEuamcGJW1V/fPTY4 RCUWHirLsMbC2ZkyKOmKir16wkAANRUqUusiTFIN6SJ4OYLq37VZJwDwUX/PA7MZDG AFeDQNetD7GiQ== Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:40:11 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Uwe =?UTF-8?B?S2xlaW5lLUvDtm5pZw==?= Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, uwe@kleine-koenig.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/12] net: Complete conversion to i2c_probe_new Message-ID: <20221122104011.20792b02@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20221122093843.ph5prj7thbxds5n7@pengutronix.de> References: <20221121191546.1853970-1-kuba@kernel.org> <20221122093843.ph5prj7thbxds5n7@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 22 Nov 2022 10:38:43 +0100 Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6nig wrote: > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 11:15:34AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > Reposting for Uwe the networking slice of his mega-series: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221118224540.619276-1-uwe@kleine-koenig.o= rg/ > > so that our build bot can confirm the obvious. > >=20 > > fix mlx5 -> mlxsw while at it. =20 >=20 > What is the relevant difference that made the build bot consider your > resent but not my series? Is it "net-next" in the Subject? Not all patches hit the netdev ML so the bot considered the series incomplete, at least on our end. I'm guessing the general Intel bot can reconstruct a partial series based on LKML.