public inbox for netdev@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@oss.nxp.com>,
	Camelia Groza <camelia.groza@nxp.com>,
	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
	Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@nxp.com>,
	Maxim Kochetkov <fido_max@inbox.ru>,
	Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>,
	Antoine Tenart <atenart@kernel.org>,
	Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>,
	Raag Jadav <raagjadav@gmail.com>,
	Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>,
	Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@intel.com>,
	Colin Foster <colin.foster@in-advantage.com>,
	Marek Behun <marek.behun@nic.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 3/8] net: phy: bcm84881: move the in-band capability check where it belongs
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 17:35:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221125153555.uzrl7j2me3lh2aeg@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y4DGhv/6BHNaMEYQ@shell.armlinux.org.uk>

On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 01:43:34PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> Hi Vladimir,
> 
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 02:30:42PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > Hi Russell,
> > 
> > Sorry for the delay. Had to do something else yesterday and the day before.
> 
> I think there was some kind of celebration going on in the US for at
> least one of those days...

Yeah, but I don't celebrate that. I had to write some documentation.

> > So the default EXT_SR is being changed by the PHY driver from 0x9088 to
> > 0x9084 (MII_M1111_HWCFG_MODE_COPPER_1000X_AN -> MII_M1111_HWCFG_MODE_SGMII_NO_CLK).
> > 
> > I don't know if it's possible to force these modules to operate in
> > 1000BASE-X mode. If you're interested in the results there, please give
> > me some guidance.
> 
> The value of "EXT_SR before" is 1000base-X, so if you change sfp-bus.c::
> sfp_select_interface() to use 1000BASEX instead of SGMII then you'll be
> using 1000BASEX instead (and it should work, although at fixed 1G
> speeds). The only reason the module is working in SGMII mode is because,
> as you've noticed above, we switch it to SGMII mode in
> m88e1111_config_init_sgmii().
> 

Which is an interesting thing, because m88e1111_config_init_1000basex()
does not change the HWCFG_MODE_MASK to something with 1000X in it.

Anyway, with sfp_select_interface() hacked, I can confirm it works in
1000BASE-X with AN enabled too.

[   69.746643] fsl_dpaa2_eth dpni.1 dpmac7: configuring for inband/sgmii link mode
[   69.845784] fsl_dpaa2_eth dpni.1 dpmac7: PHY driver reported AN inband 0x4 // PHY_AN_INBAND_ON_TIMEOUT
[   69.852764] fsl_dpaa2_eth dpni.1 dpmac7: switched to inband/1000base-x link mode // MLO_AN_INBAND
[   69.934191] Marvell 88E1111 i2c:sfp-0:16: m88e1111_config_init_1000basex: EXT_SR before 0x9088 after 0x9088, fiber page BMCR before 0x1140 after 0x1140
[   70.015735] fsl_dpaa2_eth dpni.1 dpmac7: PHY [i2c:sfp-0:16] driver [Marvell 88E1111] (irq=POLL)

ping 192.168.100.2
PING 192.168.100.2 (192.168.100.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.100.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.874 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.225 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.2: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.216 ms
^C
--- 192.168.100.2 ping statistics ---
3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2019ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.216/0.438/0.874/0.308 ms

printed with code:

static int m88e1111_config_init_1000basex(struct phy_device *phydev)
{
	int extsr = phy_read(phydev, MII_M1111_PHY_EXT_SR);
	int fiber_bmcr_before, fiber_bmcr_after;
	int ext_sr_after;
	int err, mode;

	if (extsr < 0)
		return extsr;

	fiber_bmcr_before = phy_read_paged(phydev, MII_MARVELL_FIBER_PAGE, MII_BMCR);
	if (fiber_bmcr_before < 0)
		return fiber_bmcr_before;

	/* If using copper mode, ensure 1000BaseX auto-negotiation is enabled.
	 * FIXME: does this actually enable 1000BaseX auto-negotiation if it
	 * was previously disabled in the Fiber BMCR? 2.3.1.6 suggests not!
	 */
	mode = extsr & MII_M1111_HWCFG_MODE_MASK;
	if (mode == MII_M1111_HWCFG_MODE_COPPER_1000X_NOAN) {
		err = phy_modify(phydev, MII_M1111_PHY_EXT_SR,
				 MII_M1111_HWCFG_MODE_MASK |
				 MII_M1111_HWCFG_SERIAL_AN_BYPASS,
				 MII_M1111_HWCFG_MODE_COPPER_1000X_AN |
				 MII_M1111_HWCFG_SERIAL_AN_BYPASS);
		if (err < 0)
			return err;
	}

	ext_sr_after = phy_read(phydev, MII_M1111_PHY_EXT_SR);
	if (ext_sr_after < 0)
		return ext_sr_after;

	fiber_bmcr_after = phy_read_paged(phydev, MII_MARVELL_FIBER_PAGE, MII_BMCR);
	if (fiber_bmcr_after < 0)
		return fiber_bmcr_after;

	phydev_err(phydev, "%s: EXT_SR before 0x%x after 0x%x, fiber page BMCR before 0x%x after 0x%x\n",
		   __func__, extsr, ext_sr_after,
		   fiber_bmcr_before, fiber_bmcr_after);
	return 0;
}

Furthermore, I can confirm that if the fiber page BMCR has BMCR_ANENABLE
disabled, the link with my Lynx PCS in MLO_AN_INBAND is broken (and that
the write to EXT_SR doesn't change the value of the BMCR).



But there's actually a problem (or maybe two problems).

First is that if I make phylink treat the ON_TIMEOUT capability by using
MLO_AN_PHY (basically like this):

phylink_sfp_config_phy():

	/* Select whether to operate in in-band mode or not, based on the
	 * capability of the PHY in the current link mode.
	 */
	ret = phy_validate_an_inband(phy, iface);
	phylink_err(pl, "PHY driver reported AN inband 0x%x\n", ret);
	if (ret == PHY_AN_INBAND_UNKNOWN) {
		mode = MLO_AN_INBAND;

		phylink_dbg(pl,
			    "PHY driver does not report in-band autoneg capability, assuming true\n");
//	} else if (ret & (PHY_AN_INBAND_ON | PHY_AN_INBAND_ON_TIMEOUT)) {
	} else if (ret & PHY_AN_INBAND_ON) {
		mode = MLO_AN_INBAND;
	} else {
		mode = MLO_AN_PHY;
	}

[   30.059923] fsl_dpaa2_eth dpni.1 dpmac7: PHY driver reported AN inband 0x4 // PHY_AN_INBAND_ON_TIMEOUT
[   30.066867] fsl_dpaa2_eth dpni.1 dpmac7: switched to phy/1000base-x link mode // MLO_AN_PHY
[   30.153350] Marvell 88E1111 i2c:sfp-0:16: m88e1111_config_init_1000basex: EXT_SR before 0x9088 after 0x9088, fiber page BMCR before 0x1140 after 0x1140
[   30.238970] fsl_dpaa2_eth dpni.1 dpmac7: PHY [i2c:sfp-0:16] driver [Marvell 88E1111] (irq=POLL)

then pinging is broken with mismatched in-band AN settings ("TIMEOUT" in
PHY, "OFF" in PCS). I triple-checked this.

ping 192.168.100.2
PING 192.168.100.2 (192.168.100.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
From 192.168.100.1 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable
From 192.168.100.1 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
From 192.168.100.1 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable
From 192.168.100.1 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable
From 192.168.100.1 icmp_seq=5 Destination Host Unreachable
From 192.168.100.1 icmp_seq=6 Destination Host Unreachable
^C
--- 192.168.100.2 ping statistics ---
9 packets transmitted, 0 received, +6 errors, 100% packet loss, time 8170ms


However, if using the same phylink code (to force a mismatch), I unhack
sfp_select_interface() and use SGMII mode, the timeout feature does
actually work:

[   30.262979] fsl_dpaa2_eth dpni.1 dpmac7: PHY driver reported AN inband 0x4 // PHY_AN_INBAND_ON_TIMEOUT
[   30.270349] fsl_dpaa2_eth dpni.1 dpmac7: switched to phy/sgmii link mode // MLO_AN_PHY
[   30.351066] Marvell 88E1111 i2c:sfp-0:16: m88e1111_config_init_sgmii: EXT_SR before 0x9088 after 0x9084, fiber page BMCR before 0x1140 after 0x1140
[   30.433236] fsl_dpaa2_eth dpni.1 dpmac7: PHY [i2c:sfp-0:16] driver [Marvell 88E1111] (irq=POLL)

this is a functional link despite the mismatched settings.

ping 192.168.100.2
PING 192.168.100.2 (192.168.100.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 192.168.100.2: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.885 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.2: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.221 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.2: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.216 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.2: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.217 ms
64 bytes from 192.168.100.2: icmp_seq=5 ttl=64 time=0.238 ms
^C
--- 192.168.100.2 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4062ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.216/0.355/0.885/0.264 ms


The second problem is that not even *matched* settings work if I turn
off BMCR_ANENABLE in the PHY fiber page.

[   30.809869] fsl_dpaa2_eth dpni.1 dpmac7: configuring for inband/sgmii link mode
[   30.817936] mdio_bus 0x0000000008c1f000:00: MII_BMCR 0x1140 MII_BMSR 0x9 MII_ADVERTISE 0x1 MII_LPA 0x0 IF_MODE 0x3 // PCS registers at the end of lynx_pcs_config_giga()
[   30.917651] fsl_dpaa2_eth dpni.1 dpmac7: PHY driver reported AN inband 0x4 // ignore; m88e1111_validate_an_inband() is hardcoded for this and does not detect BMCR for BASE-X
[   30.924571] fsl_dpaa2_eth dpni.1 dpmac7: switched to phy/1000base-x link mode
[   30.932441] mdio_bus 0x0000000008c1f000:00: MII_BMCR 0x140 MII_BMSR 0xd MII_ADVERTISE 0x1 MII_LPA 0x0 IF_MODE 0x1
[   31.032547] Marvell 88E1111 i2c:sfp-0:16: m88e1111_config_init_1000basex: EXT_SR before 0x9088 after 0x9088, fiber page BMCR before 0x140 after 0x140
[   31.117668] fsl_dpaa2_eth dpni.1 dpmac7: PHY [i2c:sfp-0:16] driver [Marvell 88E1111] (irq=POLL)

ping 192.168.100.2
PING 192.168.100.2 (192.168.100.2) 56(84) bytes of data.
^C
--- 192.168.100.2 ping statistics ---
4 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 3058ms

What's common is that if in-band autoneg is turned off (either forced
off or via timeout), 1000BASE-X between the Lynx PCS and the 88E1111
simply doesn't work.

> > I was curious if the fiber page BMCR has an effect for in-band autoneg,
> > and at least for SGMII it surely does. If I add this to
> > m88e1111_config_init_sgmii():
> > 
> > 	phy_modify_paged(phydev, MII_MARVELL_FIBER_PAGE, MII_BMCR,
> > 			 BMCR_ANENABLE, 0);
> > 
> > (and force an intentional mismatch) then I am able to break the link
> > with my Lynx PCS.
> 
> Yes, the fiber page is re-used for the host side of the link when
> operating in SGMII and 1000baseX modes, so changes there have the
> expected effect.
> 
> > If my hunch is correct that this also holds true for 1000BASE-X, then
> > you are also correct that m88e1111_config_init_1000basex() only allows
> > AN bypass but does not seem to enable in-band AN in itself, if it wasn't
> > enabled.
> > 
> > The implication here is that maybe we should test for the fiber page
> > BMCR in both SGMII and 1000BASE-X modes?
> 
> I think a more comprehensive test would be to write the fiber page
> BMCR with 0x140 before changing the mode from 1000baseX to SGMII and
> see whether the BMCR changes value. My suspicion is it won't, and
> the hwcfg_mode only has an effect on the settings in the fiber page
> under hardware reset conditions, and mode changes have no effect on
> the fiber page.

Confirmed that changes to the EXT_SR register don't cause changes to the
MII_BMCR register:

[   28.587838] Marvell 88E1111 i2c:sfp-0:16: m88e1111_config_init_sgmii: EXT_SR before 0x9088 after 0x9084, fiber page BMCR before 0x140 after 0x140

generated by:

static int m88e1111_config_init_sgmii(struct phy_device *phydev)
{
	int fiber_bmcr_before, fiber_bmcr_after;
	int ext_sr_before, ext_sr_after;
	int err;

	ext_sr_before = phy_read(phydev, MII_M1111_PHY_EXT_SR);
	if (ext_sr_before < 0)
		return ext_sr_before;

	err = phy_modify_paged(phydev, MII_MARVELL_FIBER_PAGE, MII_BMCR,
			       BMCR_ANENABLE, 0);
	if (err < 0)
		return err;

	fiber_bmcr_before = phy_read_paged(phydev, MII_MARVELL_FIBER_PAGE, MII_BMCR);
	if (fiber_bmcr_before < 0)
		return fiber_bmcr_before;

	err = m88e1111_config_init_hwcfg_mode(
		phydev,
		MII_M1111_HWCFG_MODE_SGMII_NO_CLK,
		MII_M1111_HWCFG_FIBER_COPPER_AUTO);
	if (err < 0)
		return err;

	ext_sr_after = phy_read(phydev, MII_M1111_PHY_EXT_SR);
	if (ext_sr_after < 0)
		return ext_sr_after;

	fiber_bmcr_after = phy_read_paged(phydev, MII_MARVELL_FIBER_PAGE, MII_BMCR);
	if (fiber_bmcr_after < 0)
		return fiber_bmcr_after;

	phydev_err(phydev, "%s: EXT_SR before 0x%x after 0x%x, fiber page BMCR before 0x%x after 0x%x\n",
		   __func__, ext_sr_before, ext_sr_after,
		   fiber_bmcr_before, fiber_bmcr_after);

	/* make sure copper is selected */
	return marvell_set_page(phydev, MII_MARVELL_COPPER_PAGE);
}

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-25 15:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-18  0:01 [PATCH v4 net-next 0/8] Let phylink manage in-band AN for the PHY Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-18  0:01 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 1/8] net: phylink: let phylink_sfp_config_phy() determine the MLO_AN_* mode to use Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-18  0:01 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 2/8] net: phylink: introduce generic method to query PHY in-band autoneg capability Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-18 15:11   ` Sean Anderson
2022-11-18 15:42     ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-18 15:49       ` Sean Anderson
2022-11-18 15:56         ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-18 15:57           ` Sean Anderson
2022-11-18 16:00             ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-22  9:21   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-22  9:41     ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-22  9:52       ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-18  0:01 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 3/8] net: phy: bcm84881: move the in-band capability check where it belongs Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-22  9:38   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-22 10:01     ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-22 11:16     ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-22 12:11       ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-22 16:58         ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-22 17:56           ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-22 18:14             ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-22 18:28             ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-22 19:36               ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-23 12:08                 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-23 13:11                   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-25 12:30                     ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-25 13:43                       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-25 15:35                         ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2022-11-27 22:14                           ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-29 13:40                             ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-29 13:43                               ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-29 14:07                               ` Andrew Lunn
2022-11-22 12:24     ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-22 17:51       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-18  0:01 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 4/8] net: phylink: add option to sync in-band autoneg setting between PCS and PHY Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-18  0:01 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 5/8] net: phylink: explicitly configure in-band autoneg for on-board PHYs Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-18 10:09   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-18 11:25     ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-18 14:37       ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-18  0:01 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 6/8] net: phy: mscc: configure in-band auto-negotiation for VSC8514 Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-18  0:01 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 7/8] net: phy: at803x: validate in-band autoneg for AT8031/AT8033 Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-18  0:01 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 8/8] net: opt MAC drivers which use Lynx PCS into phylink sync_an_inband Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-21 18:38 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 0/8] Let phylink manage in-band AN for the PHY Sean Anderson
2022-11-21 19:44   ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-21 22:42     ` Sean Anderson
2022-11-22  0:17       ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-22 16:10         ` Sean Anderson
2022-11-22 16:30           ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-11-22 16:45             ` Sean Anderson
2022-11-22 17:59           ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-11-22 18:09             ` Sean Anderson
2022-11-22  9:16   ` Russell King (Oracle)
2022-12-02 12:16 ` Maxim Kochetkov
2022-12-05 17:19   ` Vladimir Oltean

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221125153555.uzrl7j2me3lh2aeg@skbuf \
    --to=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=atenart@kernel.org \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=boon.leong.ong@intel.com \
    --cc=camelia.groza@nxp.com \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=colin.foster@in-advantage.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=fido_max@inbox.ru \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=ioana.ciornei@nxp.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=madalin.bucur@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=marek.behun@nic.cz \
    --cc=michael@walle.cc \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=raagjadav@gmail.com \
    --cc=s-vadapalli@ti.com \
    --cc=sean.anderson@seco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox