From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH xfrm-next v9 0/8] Extend XFRM core to allow packet offload configuration
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 10:10:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221202101000.0ece5e81@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y4o+X0bOz0hHh9bL@unreal>
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 20:05:19 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> You won't need to apply and deal with any
> merge conflicts which can bring our code :).
FWIW the ipsec tree feeds the netdev tree, there should be no conflicts
or full release cycle delays. In fact merging the infra in one cycle
and driver in another seems odd, no?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-02 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-27 11:18 [PATCH xfrm-next v9 0/8] Extend XFRM core to allow packet offload configuration Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-27 11:18 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v9 1/8] xfrm: add new packet offload flag Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-27 11:18 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v9 2/8] xfrm: allow state packet offload mode Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-27 11:18 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v9 3/8] xfrm: add an interface to offload policy Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-27 11:18 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v9 4/8] xfrm: add TX datapath support for IPsec packet offload mode Leon Romanovsky
2022-12-02 9:30 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-12-02 17:59 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-27 11:18 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v9 5/8] xfrm: add RX datapath protection " Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-27 11:18 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v9 6/8] xfrm: speed-up lookup of HW policies Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-27 11:18 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v9 7/8] xfrm: add support to HW update soft and hard limits Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-27 11:18 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v9 8/8] xfrm: document IPsec packet offload mode Leon Romanovsky
2022-12-02 9:42 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v9 0/8] Extend XFRM core to allow packet offload configuration Steffen Klassert
2022-12-02 18:05 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-12-02 18:10 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-12-02 18:31 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-12-02 19:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-02 19:45 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-12-02 19:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-05 9:23 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-12-06 0:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221202101000.0ece5e81@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=bbhushan2@marvell.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).