From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84303C4332F for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 18:13:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233902AbiLBSNf (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2022 13:13:35 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43134 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229450AbiLBSNe (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Dec 2022 13:13:34 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 996E1E61EE for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 10:13:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F5D562335 for ; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 18:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42301C433C1; Fri, 2 Dec 2022 18:13:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1670004812; bh=ogidUybG6iOQ5z/Ec6MFOXVR+QQvJqL+GpOXrYVglq0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=tLLEc1kJuMeIlXtejc3Sxc+wAAQVSCcl4JrYUZqipnfXfkH7zHD63qlz7I7Tc5zKm eQfCI1hr0q8CCPlzVcd81wLPlYRCtto3/yJNSy2dGtUZSpzRtyFXy0TJb43zIuR0NV Wz0kxFzUkzvsC3pIQY+eLDUyP02xRZ8HhKmybkx67B8HI/Hj3N/7CVkaOoaffJu0Xr pkULbScFphFZRkcWDB0lfA+J91NANxcZb8U8O7kKptD+7dIv731AoVjhHTAdc8sDA/ r6kDjJpubPUXwHfATFFOKRKU/YKY2uxWjBjoM0RTO0a+OyX74PARQDYyqDMVb8ZvRW 6gWLLEiz16bVQ== Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 10:13:31 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Pedro Tammela Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, jhs@mojatatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com, jiri@resnulli.us, kuniyu@amazon.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net/sched: add retpoline wrapper for tc Message-ID: <20221202101331.178f0bcb@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20221128154456.689326-1-pctammela@mojatatu.com> <20221128154456.689326-2-pctammela@mojatatu.com> <20221130211643.01d65f46@kernel.org> <19b7c2fe-2e56-cc56-86ca-dface0270bad@mojatatu.com> <20221201143812.47089fb1@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 09:48:49 -0300 Pedro Tammela wrote: > > Most definitely not to this reader :) The less macro magic the better. > > I'm primarily curious about whether the compiler treats this sort of > > construct the same as a switch. > > Apparently we can't do a switch case in pointer addresses because the > case condition must be constant. Ack, thanks for checking!