From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH xfrm-next v9 0/8] Extend XFRM core to allow packet offload configuration
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 11:52:13 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221202115213.0055aa4a@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y4pV6+LxhyDO2Ufz@unreal>
On Fri, 2 Dec 2022 21:45:47 +0200 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > More of a question of whether we can reasonably expect to merge all
> > the driver code in a single release cycle. If not then piecemeal
> > merging is indeed inevitable. But if Steffen is happy with the core
> > changes whether they are in tree for 6.2 or not should not matter.
> > An upstream user can't access them anyway, it'd only matter to an
> > out-of-tree consumer.
> >
> > That's just my 2 cents, whatever Steffen prefers matters most.
>
> There are no out-of-tree users, just ton of mlx5 refactoring to natively
> support packet offload.
30 patches is just two series, that's mergeable in a week.
You know, if it builds cleanly.. :S Dunno.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-02 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-27 11:18 [PATCH xfrm-next v9 0/8] Extend XFRM core to allow packet offload configuration Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-27 11:18 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v9 1/8] xfrm: add new packet offload flag Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-27 11:18 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v9 2/8] xfrm: allow state packet offload mode Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-27 11:18 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v9 3/8] xfrm: add an interface to offload policy Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-27 11:18 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v9 4/8] xfrm: add TX datapath support for IPsec packet offload mode Leon Romanovsky
2022-12-02 9:30 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-12-02 17:59 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-27 11:18 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v9 5/8] xfrm: add RX datapath protection " Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-27 11:18 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v9 6/8] xfrm: speed-up lookup of HW policies Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-27 11:18 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v9 7/8] xfrm: add support to HW update soft and hard limits Leon Romanovsky
2022-11-27 11:18 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v9 8/8] xfrm: document IPsec packet offload mode Leon Romanovsky
2022-12-02 9:42 ` [PATCH xfrm-next v9 0/8] Extend XFRM core to allow packet offload configuration Steffen Klassert
2022-12-02 18:05 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-12-02 18:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-02 18:31 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-12-02 19:26 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-02 19:45 ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-12-02 19:52 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-12-05 9:23 ` Steffen Klassert
2022-12-06 0:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221202115213.0055aa4a@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=bbhushan2@marvell.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).