From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B301C4708C for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 01:38:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233804AbiLFBik (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2022 20:38:40 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49942 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233678AbiLFBiV (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2022 20:38:21 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A50E36245; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 17:37:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16BE9614FB; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 01:37:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6C59C433C1; Tue, 6 Dec 2022 01:37:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1670290657; bh=rz19PUH2Fl8oeU0CkmkBHGY6X9eg4p+1gMp4aSzTuN4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Sd6Ym3mpLMCXU73KLRNSYcMQwkNptFMtFy9WBf62Z0tQxYfnsdhqkLWLBl1nr7aTU 4qW+aVFSkc+ROd840dxdI+tfUhjIPQYiY/fmFe6TQToUY0fY4tmOvFKvZBGFG2Ma+r iw/HaEg2Ir64rCnzKr7oLtye1A3ISapkg6AXNUAzMcgACUM6S42mxjy2nSx1/QoJAY nxJhCYOK0jzij2L7Gxw49f5daFBlyNHwEQaL09dBnb1632s/KaTNDbqrf6v8VT3t20 hOyPYKbIKlR5QBc9U+U0z645ud6U5gW409V3CUVPeCwgwdg2/A3dIGSZumv66wHzBP d1efGFj+q0Dtw== Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 17:37:35 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Stefano Garzarella Cc: Bobby Eshleman , Bobby Eshleman , Cong Wang , Jiang Wang , Krasnov Arseniy , Stefan Hajnoczi , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] virtio/vsock: replace virtio_vsock_pkt with sk_buff Message-ID: <20221205173735.6123b941@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20221205122214.bky3oxipck4hsqqe@sgarzare-redhat> References: <20221202173520.10428-1-bobby.eshleman@bytedance.com> <20221205122214.bky3oxipck4hsqqe@sgarzare-redhat> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 13:22:14 +0100 Stefano Garzarella wrote: > As pointed out in v4, this is net-next material, so you should use the > net-next tag and base the patch on the net-next tree: > https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v6.0/process/maintainer-netdev.html#netdev-faq Thanks, yes, please try to do that, makes it much less likely that the patch will be mishandled or lost. > I locally applied the patch on net-next and everything is fine, so maybe > the maintainers can apply it, otherwise you should resend it with the > right tag. FWIW looks like all the automated guessing kicked in correctly here, so no need to repost just for the subject tag (this time). > Ah, in that case I suggest you send it before the next merge window > opens (I guess next week), because net-next closes and you'll have to > wait for the next cycle. +1, we'll try to take a closer look & apply tomorrow unless someone speaks up.