* [PATCH net v4] ethernet: s2io: don't call dev_kfree_skb() under spin_lock_irqsave()
@ 2022-12-08 12:01 Yang Yingliang
2022-12-08 16:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-12 9:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yang Yingliang @ 2022-12-08 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: jdmason, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, leon
It is not allowed to call kfree_skb() or consume_skb() from hardware
interrupt context or with hardware interrupts being disabled.
It should use dev_kfree_skb_irq() or dev_consume_skb_irq() instead.
The difference between them is free reason, dev_kfree_skb_irq() means
the SKB is dropped in error and dev_consume_skb_irq() means the SKB
is consumed in normal.
In this case, dev_kfree_skb() is called in free_tx_buffers() to drop
the SKBs in tx buffers, when the card is down, so replace it with
dev_kfree_skb_irq() here.
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
---
v4 -> v3:
Update commit message, and change to use dev_kfree_skb_irq().
v2 -> v3:
Update commit message.
v1 -> v2:
Add fix tag.
---
drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/s2io.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/s2io.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/s2io.c
index 1d3c4474b7cb..a83d61d45936 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/s2io.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/neterion/s2io.c
@@ -2386,7 +2386,7 @@ static void free_tx_buffers(struct s2io_nic *nic)
skb = s2io_txdl_getskb(&mac_control->fifos[i], txdp, j);
if (skb) {
swstats->mem_freed += skb->truesize;
- dev_kfree_skb(skb);
+ dev_kfree_skb_irq(skb);
cnt++;
}
}
--
2.25.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v4] ethernet: s2io: don't call dev_kfree_skb() under spin_lock_irqsave()
2022-12-08 12:01 [PATCH net v4] ethernet: s2io: don't call dev_kfree_skb() under spin_lock_irqsave() Yang Yingliang
@ 2022-12-08 16:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-12 1:58 ` Yang Yingliang
2022-12-12 9:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2022-12-08 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yang Yingliang; +Cc: netdev, jdmason, davem, edumazet, pabeni, leon
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 20:01:21 +0800 Yang Yingliang wrote:
> It is not allowed to call kfree_skb() or consume_skb() from hardware
> interrupt context or with hardware interrupts being disabled.
>
> It should use dev_kfree_skb_irq() or dev_consume_skb_irq() instead.
> The difference between them is free reason, dev_kfree_skb_irq() means
> the SKB is dropped in error and dev_consume_skb_irq() means the SKB
> is consumed in normal.
>
> In this case, dev_kfree_skb() is called in free_tx_buffers() to drop
> the SKBs in tx buffers, when the card is down, so replace it with
> dev_kfree_skb_irq() here.
Make sure you read this:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v4] ethernet: s2io: don't call dev_kfree_skb() under spin_lock_irqsave()
2022-12-08 16:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2022-12-12 1:58 ` Yang Yingliang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yang Yingliang @ 2022-12-12 1:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jakub Kicinski; +Cc: netdev, jdmason, davem, edumazet, pabeni, leon
On 2022/12/9 0:47, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 20:01:21 +0800 Yang Yingliang wrote:
>> It is not allowed to call kfree_skb() or consume_skb() from hardware
>> interrupt context or with hardware interrupts being disabled.
>>
>> It should use dev_kfree_skb_irq() or dev_consume_skb_irq() instead.
>> The difference between them is free reason, dev_kfree_skb_irq() means
>> the SKB is dropped in error and dev_consume_skb_irq() means the SKB
>> is consumed in normal.
>>
>> In this case, dev_kfree_skb() is called in free_tx_buffers() to drop
>> the SKBs in tx buffers, when the card is down, so replace it with
>> dev_kfree_skb_irq() here.
> Make sure you read this:
>
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html
OK.
Thanks,
Yang
> .
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v4] ethernet: s2io: don't call dev_kfree_skb() under spin_lock_irqsave()
2022-12-08 12:01 [PATCH net v4] ethernet: s2io: don't call dev_kfree_skb() under spin_lock_irqsave() Yang Yingliang
2022-12-08 16:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2022-12-12 9:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2022-12-12 9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yang Yingliang; +Cc: netdev, jdmason, davem, edumazet, kuba, pabeni, leon
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (master)
by David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>:
On Thu, 8 Dec 2022 20:01:21 +0800 you wrote:
> It is not allowed to call kfree_skb() or consume_skb() from hardware
> interrupt context or with hardware interrupts being disabled.
>
> It should use dev_kfree_skb_irq() or dev_consume_skb_irq() instead.
> The difference between them is free reason, dev_kfree_skb_irq() means
> the SKB is dropped in error and dev_consume_skb_irq() means the SKB
> is consumed in normal.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net,v4] ethernet: s2io: don't call dev_kfree_skb() under spin_lock_irqsave()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/6cee96e09df5
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-12-12 9:40 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-12-08 12:01 [PATCH net v4] ethernet: s2io: don't call dev_kfree_skb() under spin_lock_irqsave() Yang Yingliang
2022-12-08 16:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-12 1:58 ` Yang Yingliang
2022-12-12 9:40 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).