From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <edumazet@google.com>,
<pabeni@redhat.com>, <leon@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 01/15] devlink: move code to a dedicated directory
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 11:13:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221215111315.3637cdcc@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cebb83f7-139d-5d40-5731-425873bae422@intel.com>
On Thu, 15 Dec 2022 10:44:14 -0800 Jacob Keller wrote:
> On 12/15/2022 1:51 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 03:01:41AM CET, kuba@kernel.org wrote:
> >> The devlink code is hard to navigate with 13kLoC in one file.
> >> I really like the way Michal split the ethtool into per-command
> >> files and core. It'd probably be too much to split it all up,
> >
> > Why not? While you are at it, I think that we should split it right
> > away.
>
> From the cover letter it sounds like "not enough time". I like
> splitting things up but would be fine with just one file per sub object
> type like one for ports, one for regions, etc.
Indeed, I had to draw the line somewhere. Always plenty of
opportunities to reshuffle and improve code which has grown
organically over the years. But the sun goes down obsitnately...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-15 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-15 2:01 [RFC net-next 00/15] devlink: code split and structured instance walk Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-15 2:01 ` [RFC net-next 01/15] devlink: move code to a dedicated directory Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-15 9:51 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-15 18:44 ` Jacob Keller
2022-12-15 19:13 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-12-15 19:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-15 19:29 ` Jacob Keller
2022-12-15 19:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-16 9:09 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-16 9:10 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-16 18:32 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-16 23:26 ` Jacob Keller
2022-12-15 2:01 ` [RFC net-next 02/15] devlink: split out core code Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-15 2:01 ` [RFC net-next 03/15] devlink: split out netlink code Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-15 18:45 ` Jacob Keller
2022-12-15 19:14 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-15 19:35 ` Jacob Keller
2022-12-15 2:01 ` [RFC net-next 04/15] devlink: protect devlink dump by the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-15 8:42 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-15 19:17 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-15 2:01 ` [RFC net-next 05/15] netlink: add macro for checking dump ctx size Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-15 2:01 ` [RFC net-next 06/15] devlink: use an explicit structure for dump context Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-15 9:52 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-15 18:50 ` Jacob Keller
2022-12-15 19:18 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-15 2:01 ` [RFC net-next 07/15] devlink: remove start variables from dumps Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-15 2:01 ` [RFC net-next 08/15] devlink: drop the filter argument from devlinks_xa_find_get Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-15 18:52 ` Jacob Keller
2022-12-15 2:01 ` [RFC net-next 09/15] devlink: health: combine loops in dump Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-15 2:01 ` [RFC net-next 10/15] devlink: restart dump based on devlink instance ids (simple) Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-15 18:59 ` Jacob Keller
2022-12-15 2:01 ` [RFC net-next 11/15] devlink: restart dump based on devlink instance ids (nested) Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-15 2:01 ` [RFC net-next 12/15] devlink: restart dump based on devlink instance ids (function) Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-15 2:01 ` [RFC net-next 13/15] devlink: uniformly take the devlink instance lock in the dump loop Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-15 2:01 ` [RFC net-next 14/15] devlink: add by-instance dump infra Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-15 9:11 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-15 19:24 ` Jacob Keller
2022-12-15 19:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-16 9:23 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-15 19:03 ` Jacob Keller
2022-12-15 2:01 ` [RFC net-next 15/15] devlink: convert remaining dumps to the by-instance scheme Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-15 19:39 ` [RFC net-next 00/15] devlink: code split and structured instance walk Jacob Keller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221215111315.3637cdcc@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).