From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [ANN] netdev development stats for 6.2
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 18:06:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221215180608.04441356@kernel.org> (raw)
Hi!
Here are the stats for the last release cycle (based on 18k emails
netdev has seen since Oct 3rd).
The methodology has not changed since the last time I shared those:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221004212721.069dd189@kernel.org/
I have now put the script up on GitHub for everyone to see / improve
/ hack on: https://github.com/kuba-moo/ml-stat
When comparing the stats note that we had roughly 4k more messages,
partially due to the length of the analyzed period.
Like previously, please discount my "reviews" slightly as I send
a lot of "process" emails..
Top 10 reviewers (thr): Top 10 reviewers (msg):
1. [354] Jakub Kicinski 1. [582] Jakub Kicinski
2. [171] Andrew Lunn 2. [325] Andrew Lunn
3. [140] Leon Romanovsky 3. [263] Leon Romanovsky
4. [ 88] Eric Dumazet 4. [196] Vladimir Oltean
5. [ 88] Paolo Abeni 5. [154] Eric Dumazet
6. [ 76] Vladimir Oltean 6. [149] Jiri Pirko
7. [ 60] Jiri Pirko 7. [121] Krzysztof Kozlowski
8. [ 57] Krzysztof Kozlowski 8. [118] Russell King
9. [ 53] Russell King 9. [116] Paolo Abeni
10. [ 47] Saeed Mahameed 10. [ 86] Florian Fainelli
The review count went up quite a bit for everyone but Krzysztof and
myself. Andrew remains firmly our top reviewer. We can see a
significant increase in participation from nVidia.
Top 15 authors (thr): Top 10 authors (msg):
1. [ 65] Zhengchao Shao 1. [234] Saeed Mahameed
2. [ 58] Jakub Kicinski 2. [182] David Howells
3. [ 57] Yang Yingliang 3. [146] Tony Nguyen
4. [ 44] Kees Cook 4. [140] Jakub Kicinski
5. [ 32] Eric Dumazet 5. [125] Marc Kleine-Budde
6. [ 32] Vladimir Oltean 6. [119] Ido Schimmel
7. [ 26] Yuan Can 7. [113] Leon Romanovsky
8. [ 26] Kumar, M Chetan 8. [111] Steen Hegelund
9. [ 26] Dan Carpenter 9. [ 96] Vladimir Oltean
10. [ 26] Xin Long 10. [ 94] Yang Yingliang
Where we count "authorship" by a fresh posting of a patch to the list.
So Saeed gets credit for all revisions of all patches that came thru
his tree, for example.
As for "scores" which are supposed to point out who doesn't help
with reviewing (10 * reviews - 3 * authorship):
Top 10 scores (positive): Top 10 scores (negative):
1. [4458] Jakub Kicinski 1. [240] Zhengchao Shao
2. [2355] Andrew Lunn 2. [206] Yang Yingliang
3. [1808] Leon Romanovsky 3. [ 96] Yuan Can
4. [1069] Paolo Abeni 4. [ 87] Zhang Changzhong
5. [1058] Eric Dumazet 5. [ 87] Wang Yufen
6. [1006] Vladimir Oltean 6. [ 84] Lorenzo Bianconi
7. [ 809] Jiri Pirko 7. [ 82] Michal Wilczynski
8. [ 765] Krzysztof Kozlowski 8. [ 82] Colin Ian King
9. [ 700] Russell King 9. [ 80] Shenwei Wang
10. [ 561] Rob Herring 10. [ 73] YueHaibing
The positive section looks very much like the top reviewer section.
Kuniyuki has become an active reviewer of the socket layer (thanks!!)
therefore taking Amazon off the negative scores. Now the top three
negative scores belong to people sending semi-automated "bug fixes".
As for the corporate stats:
Top 10 reviewers (thr): Top 10 reviewers (msg):
1. [398] Meta 1. [746] Meta
2. [260] nVidia 2. [594] nVidia
3. [212] Intel 3. [427] Intel
4. [174] RedHat 4. [387] RedHat
5. [171] Andrew Lunn 5. [325] Andrew Lunn
6. [141] Google 6. [279] Google
7. [ 83] NXP 7. [210] NXP
Top 15 authors (thr): Top 10 authors (msg):
1. [366] Huawei 1. [705] nVidia
2. [184] Intel 2. [554] Huawei
3. [136] RedHat 3. [554] Intel
4. [123] Google 4. [485] RedHat
5. [113] nVidia 5. [410] Microchip
6. [ 90] Microchip 6. [256] Pengutronix
7. [ 68] Meta 7. [254] Google
Top 15 scores (positive): Top 15 scores (negative):
1. [5179] Meta 1. [1131] Huawei
2. [3095] nVidia 2. [ 217] Microchip
3. [2355] Andrew Lunn 3. [ 96] ZTE
4. [2143] Intel 4. [ 82] Alibaba
5. [1862] RedHat 5. [ 82] Colin Ian King
6. [1470] Google ... one-time contributors follow
7. [ 985] NXP
8. [ 835] Linaro
9. [ 755] Oracle
10. [ 694] Isovalent
11. [ 561] Rob Herring
12. [ 560] Florian Fainelli
Significant increase in activity from nVidia, both in terms of
authorship (1.5x) and reviews (3x).
Huawei leads the pack in terms of patch bombardment with no real
participation. Interestingly Microchip remains in the #2 spot of
the negative score list.
reply other threads:[~2022-12-16 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221215180608.04441356@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).