From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: jacob.e.keller@intel.com, leon@kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 01/10] devlink: bump the instance index directly when iterating
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2023 14:56:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230102145654.24aec331@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y7LbF0+aRjT6AkZ+@nanopsycho>
On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 14:24:39 +0100 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >-struct devlink *
> >-devlinks_xa_find_get(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp,
> >- void * (*xa_find_fn)(struct xarray *, unsigned long *,
> >- unsigned long, xa_mark_t))
> >+struct devlink *devlinks_xa_find_get(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp)
> > {
> >- struct devlink *devlink;
> >+ struct devlink *devlink = NULL;
> >
> > rcu_read_lock();
> > retry:
> >- devlink = xa_find_fn(&devlinks, indexp, ULONG_MAX, DEVLINK_REGISTERED);
> >+ devlink = xa_find(&devlinks, indexp, ULONG_MAX, DEVLINK_REGISTERED);
> > if (!devlink)
> > goto unlock;
> >
> >@@ -109,31 +106,21 @@ devlinks_xa_find_get(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp,
> > * This prevents live-lock of devlink_unregister() wait for completion.
> > */
> > if (xa_get_mark(&devlinks, *indexp, DEVLINK_UNREGISTERING))
> >- goto retry;
> >+ goto next;
> >
> >- /* For a possible retry, the xa_find_after() should be always used */
> >- xa_find_fn = xa_find_after;
>
> Hmm. Any idea why xa_find_after()? implementation is different to
> xa_find()?
I'm guessing it's because for _after the code needs to take special
care of skipping multi-index entries. If an entry spans 0-3 xa_find(0)
can return the same entry as xa_find(1). But xa_find_after(1) must
return an entry under index 4 or higher.
Since our use of the Xarray is very trivial with no range indexes,
it should not matter.
Let me CC Matthew, just in case. The question boils down to whether:
for (index = 0; (entry = xa_find(net, &index)); index++)
is a legal way of iterating over an Xarray without range indexes.
> > if (!devlink_try_get(devlink))
> >- goto retry;
> >+ goto next;
> > if (!net_eq(devlink_net(devlink), net)) {
> > devlink_put(devlink);
> >- goto retry;
> >+ goto next;
> > }
> > unlock:
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> > return devlink;
> >-}
> >-
> >-struct devlink *
> >-devlinks_xa_find_get_first(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp)
> >-{
> >- return devlinks_xa_find_get(net, indexp, xa_find);
> >-}
> >
> >-struct devlink *
> >-devlinks_xa_find_get_next(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp)
> >-{
> >- return devlinks_xa_find_get(net, indexp, xa_find_after);
> >+next:
> >+ (*indexp)++;
> >+ goto retry;
> > }
> >
> > /**
> >diff --git a/net/devlink/devl_internal.h b/net/devlink/devl_internal.h
> >index 1d7ab11f2f7e..ef0369449592 100644
> >--- a/net/devlink/devl_internal.h
> >+++ b/net/devlink/devl_internal.h
> >@@ -82,18 +82,9 @@ extern struct genl_family devlink_nl_family;
> > * in loop body in order to release the reference.
> > */
> > #define devlinks_xa_for_each_registered_get(net, index, devlink) \
> >- for (index = 0, \
> >- devlink = devlinks_xa_find_get_first(net, &index); \
> >- devlink; devlink = devlinks_xa_find_get_next(net, &index))
> >-
> >-struct devlink *
> >-devlinks_xa_find_get(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp,
> >- void * (*xa_find_fn)(struct xarray *, unsigned long *,
> >- unsigned long, xa_mark_t));
> >-struct devlink *
> >-devlinks_xa_find_get_first(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp);
> >-struct devlink *
> >-devlinks_xa_find_get_next(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp);
> >+ for (index = 0; (devlink = devlinks_xa_find_get(net, &index)); index++)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-02 22:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-17 1:19 [RFC net-next 00/10] devlink: remove the wait-for-references on unregister Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-17 1:19 ` [RFC net-next 01/10] devlink: bump the instance index directly when iterating Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-02 13:24 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-02 22:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-03 7:35 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04 2:31 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-02 22:56 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-12-17 1:19 ` [RFC net-next 02/10] devlink: update the code in netns move to latest helpers Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-02 13:45 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-17 1:19 ` [RFC net-next 03/10] devlink: protect devlink->dev by the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-17 1:19 ` [RFC net-next 04/10] devlink: always check if the devlink instance is registered Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-19 17:48 ` Jacob Keller
2022-12-19 21:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-19 22:08 ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-02 13:58 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-02 23:05 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-03 9:26 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04 2:49 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 16:14 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-02 14:57 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-02 15:12 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-02 23:16 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-03 9:30 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-03 12:26 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04 2:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-17 1:19 ` [RFC net-next 05/10] devlink: remove the registration guarantee of references Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-19 17:56 ` Jacob Keller
2022-12-19 22:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-19 22:14 ` Jacob Keller
2022-12-19 22:31 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-02 14:18 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-02 14:32 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-02 23:18 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-17 1:19 ` [RFC net-next 06/10] devlink: don't require setting features before registration Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-02 15:25 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-02 23:24 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-02 23:32 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-03 9:46 ` Jiri Pirko
2022-12-17 1:19 ` [RFC net-next 07/10] netdevsim: rename a label Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-19 18:01 ` Jacob Keller
2022-12-17 1:19 ` [RFC net-next 08/10] netdevsim: move devlink registration under the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-17 1:19 ` [RFC net-next 09/10] devlink: allow registering parameters after the instance Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-17 1:19 ` [RFC net-next 10/10] netdevsim: register devlink instance before sub-objects Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-02 13:34 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-02 23:25 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-03 9:51 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04 2:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-19 17:38 ` [RFC net-next 00/10] devlink: remove the wait-for-references on unregister Jacob Keller
2022-12-19 22:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-12-19 22:16 ` Jacob Keller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230102145654.24aec331@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).