From: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dsa: marvell: Provide per device information about max frame size
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2023 10:02:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230103100251.08a5db46@wsk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y7M+mWMU+DJPYubp@lunn.ch>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2314 bytes --]
Hi Andrew,
> > @@ -3548,7 +3548,9 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_get_max_mtu(struct
> > dsa_switch *ds, int port) if (chip->info->ops->port_set_jumbo_size)
> > return 10240 - VLAN_ETH_HLEN - EDSA_HLEN -
> > ETH_FCS_LEN; else if (chip->info->ops->set_max_frame_size)
> > - return 1632 - VLAN_ETH_HLEN - EDSA_HLEN -
> > ETH_FCS_LEN;
> > + return (max_t(int, chip->info->max_frame_size,
> > 1632)
> > + - VLAN_ETH_HLEN - EDSA_HLEN - ETH_FCS_LEN);
> > +
> > return 1522 - VLAN_ETH_HLEN - EDSA_HLEN - ETH_FCS_LEN;
>
> I would also prefer if all this if/else logic is removed, and the code
> simply returned chip->info->max_frame_size - VLAN_ETH_HLEN -
> EDSA_HLEN - ETH_FCS_LEN;
>
So then the mv88e6xxx_get_max_mtu shall look like:
WARN_ON_ONCE(!chip->info->max_frame_size)
if (chip->info->ops->port_set_jumbo_size)
...
else
return chip->info->max_frame_size - VLAN_ETH_HLEN -
EDSA_HLEN - ETH_FCS_LEN;
Or shall I put WARN_ON_ONCE to the mv88e6xxx_probe() function?
The above approach is contrary to one proposed by Alexander, who wanted
to improve the defensive approach in this driver (to avoid situation
where the max_frame_size callback is not defined and max_frame_size
member of *_info struct is not added by developer).
Which approach is the recommended one for this driver?
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.h
> > @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ struct mv88e6xxx_info {
> > unsigned int num_gpio;
> > unsigned int max_vid;
> > unsigned int max_sid;
> > + unsigned int max_frame_size;
>
> It might be worth adding a comment here what this value actually
> represents.
Ok. I will add proper comment.
> We don't want any mixups where the value already has the
> frame checksum removed for example.
Could you be more specific here about this use case?
The max_frame_size is the maximal size of the ethernet frame for which
the IC designer provided specified amount of RAM (it is a different
value for different SoCs in the Link Street family).
>
> Andrew
Best regards,
Lukasz Majewski
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Erika Unter
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-59 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: lukma@denx.de
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-03 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-02 15:02 [PATCH v3 1/3] dsa: marvell: Provide per device information about max frame size Lukasz Majewski
2023-01-02 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add support for MV88E6020 switch Lukasz Majewski
2023-01-02 20:00 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-01-03 8:46 ` Lukasz Majewski
2023-01-02 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add support for MV88E6071 switch Lukasz Majewski
2023-01-02 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] dsa: marvell: Provide per device information about max frame size Andrew Lunn
2023-01-02 20:29 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-01-03 9:02 ` Lukasz Majewski [this message]
2023-01-03 12:54 ` Andrew Lunn
2023-01-05 10:37 ` Lukasz Majewski
2023-01-05 16:13 ` Alexander Duyck
2023-01-05 17:44 ` Lukasz Majewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230103100251.08a5db46@wsk \
--to=lukma@denx.de \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).