netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
	pabeni@redhat.com, jacob.e.keller@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 02/14] devlink: split out core code
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2023 18:10:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230104181007.65d0eb6e@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y7VL6P0hfCEvBFzV@nanopsycho>

On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 10:50:32 +0100 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >Rename devlink_netdevice_event() to make it clear that it only touches
> >ports (that's the only change which isn't a pure code move).  
> 
> Did you do any other changes on the move? 

Please read the paragraph you're quoting again.
I specifically addressed this question.

> I believe that for patches like this that move a lot of code it is
> beneficial to move the code "as is". The changes could be done in a
> separate patches, for the ease of review purposes.

I obviously know that. That's why patch 1 and patch 2 are separate.
The line between what warrants a separate patch and what doesn't
is somewhat subjective.

> Could you please?

Sure.. :/

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-05  2:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-04  4:16 [PATCH net-next 00/14] devlink: code split and structured instance walk Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 01/14] devlink: move code to a dedicated directory Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 02/14] devlink: split out core code Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04  9:50   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-05  2:10     ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-01-06 23:55       ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 03/14] devlink: split out netlink code Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-05  9:03   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-05 18:20     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06  8:47       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 04/14] netlink: add macro for checking dump ctx size Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04  9:51   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 05/14] devlink: use an explicit structure for dump context Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 10:04   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-05  2:22     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 06/14] devlink: remove start variables from dumps Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 07/14] devlink: drop the filter argument from devlinks_xa_find_get Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 10:05   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 08/14] devlink: health: combine loops in dump Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 10:06   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 09/14] devlink: restart dump based on devlink instance ids (simple) Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 14:18   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-05  3:21     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 10/14] devlink: restart dump based on devlink instance ids (nested) Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 15:47   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 11/14] devlink: restart dump based on devlink instance ids (function) Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 15:51   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 12/14] devlink: uniformly take the devlink instance lock in the dump loop Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 15:52   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 13/14] devlink: add by-instance dump infra Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-04 16:50   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-05  3:46     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-05  9:02       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-05 18:24         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06  8:56           ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 21:12             ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-07  9:23               ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-09 19:49                 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-10 14:31                   ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-12  0:13                     ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-06 11:25       ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-04  4:16 ` [PATCH net-next 14/14] devlink: convert remaining dumps to the by-instance scheme Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230104181007.65d0eb6e@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).