From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
jacob.e.keller@intel.com, jiri@resnulli.us,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/9] devlink: bump the instance index directly when iterating
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 22:33:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230106063402.485336-2-kuba@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230106063402.485336-1-kuba@kernel.org>
xa_find_after() is designed to handle multi-index entries correctly.
If a xarray has two entries one which spans indexes 0-3 and one at
index 4 xa_find_after(0) will return the entry at index 4.
Having to juggle the two callbacks, however, is unnecessary in case
of the devlink xarray, as there is 1:1 relationship with indexes.
Always use xa_find() and increment the index manually.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
---
net/devlink/core.c | 31 +++++++++----------------------
net/devlink/devl_internal.h | 17 ++++-------------
2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/devlink/core.c b/net/devlink/core.c
index 371d6821315d..88c88b8053e2 100644
--- a/net/devlink/core.c
+++ b/net/devlink/core.c
@@ -91,16 +91,13 @@ void devlink_put(struct devlink *devlink)
call_rcu(&devlink->rcu, __devlink_put_rcu);
}
-struct devlink *
-devlinks_xa_find_get(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp,
- void * (*xa_find_fn)(struct xarray *, unsigned long *,
- unsigned long, xa_mark_t))
+struct devlink *devlinks_xa_find_get(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp)
{
- struct devlink *devlink;
+ struct devlink *devlink = NULL;
rcu_read_lock();
retry:
- devlink = xa_find_fn(&devlinks, indexp, ULONG_MAX, DEVLINK_REGISTERED);
+ devlink = xa_find(&devlinks, indexp, ULONG_MAX, DEVLINK_REGISTERED);
if (!devlink)
goto unlock;
@@ -109,31 +106,21 @@ devlinks_xa_find_get(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp,
* This prevents live-lock of devlink_unregister() wait for completion.
*/
if (xa_get_mark(&devlinks, *indexp, DEVLINK_UNREGISTERING))
- goto retry;
+ goto next;
- /* For a possible retry, the xa_find_after() should be always used */
- xa_find_fn = xa_find_after;
if (!devlink_try_get(devlink))
- goto retry;
+ goto next;
if (!net_eq(devlink_net(devlink), net)) {
devlink_put(devlink);
- goto retry;
+ goto next;
}
unlock:
rcu_read_unlock();
return devlink;
-}
-
-struct devlink *
-devlinks_xa_find_get_first(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp)
-{
- return devlinks_xa_find_get(net, indexp, xa_find);
-}
-struct devlink *
-devlinks_xa_find_get_next(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp)
-{
- return devlinks_xa_find_get(net, indexp, xa_find_after);
+next:
+ (*indexp)++;
+ goto retry;
}
/**
diff --git a/net/devlink/devl_internal.h b/net/devlink/devl_internal.h
index adf9f6c177db..14767e809178 100644
--- a/net/devlink/devl_internal.h
+++ b/net/devlink/devl_internal.h
@@ -82,18 +82,9 @@ extern struct genl_family devlink_nl_family;
* in loop body in order to release the reference.
*/
#define devlinks_xa_for_each_registered_get(net, index, devlink) \
- for (index = 0, \
- devlink = devlinks_xa_find_get_first(net, &index); \
- devlink; devlink = devlinks_xa_find_get_next(net, &index))
-
-struct devlink *
-devlinks_xa_find_get(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp,
- void * (*xa_find_fn)(struct xarray *, unsigned long *,
- unsigned long, xa_mark_t));
-struct devlink *
-devlinks_xa_find_get_first(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp);
-struct devlink *
-devlinks_xa_find_get_next(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp);
+ for (index = 0; (devlink = devlinks_xa_find_get(net, &index)); index++)
+
+struct devlink *devlinks_xa_find_get(struct net *net, unsigned long *indexp);
/* Netlink */
#define DEVLINK_NL_FLAG_NEED_PORT BIT(0)
@@ -135,7 +126,7 @@ struct devlink_gen_cmd {
*/
#define devlink_dump_for_each_instance_get(msg, state, devlink) \
for (; (devlink = devlinks_xa_find_get(sock_net(msg->sk), \
- &state->instance, xa_find)); \
+ &state->instance)); \
state->instance++, state->idx = 0)
extern const struct genl_small_ops devlink_nl_ops[56];
--
2.38.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-06 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-06 6:33 [PATCH net-next 0/9] devlink: remove the wait-for-references on unregister Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 6:33 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-01-06 12:17 ` [PATCH net-next 1/9] devlink: bump the instance index directly when iterating Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 2/9] devlink: update the code in netns move to latest helpers Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 3/9] devlink: protect devlink->dev by the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:18 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 4/9] devlink: always check if the devlink instance is registered Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:41 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 17:03 ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-06 21:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-07 9:05 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] devlink: remove the registration guarantee of references Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:42 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 6:33 ` [PATCH net-next 6/9] devlink: don't require setting features before registration Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:43 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 6:34 ` [PATCH net-next 7/9] devlink: allow registering parameters after the instance Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:55 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 21:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-07 9:20 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-10 0:21 ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-10 16:35 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-10 20:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-11 9:32 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-11 16:45 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-11 21:29 ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-12 7:07 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-12 14:59 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-12 19:58 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-13 7:50 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-15 8:35 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-16 10:33 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-16 11:25 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-12 19:20 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-12 20:09 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-12 22:44 ` Jacob Keller
2023-01-13 6:45 ` Leon Romanovsky
2023-01-13 7:53 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-11 13:21 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 6:34 ` [PATCH net-next 8/9] netdevsim: rename a label Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 12:56 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 6:34 ` [PATCH net-next 9/9] netdevsim: move devlink registration under the instance lock Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-06 15:49 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 13:10 ` [PATCH net-next 0/9] devlink: remove the wait-for-references on unregister patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-01-06 15:49 ` Jiri Pirko
2023-01-06 17:06 ` Jacob Keller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230106063402.485336-2-kuba@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).