netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Maxwell <jmaxwell37@gmail.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, dsahern@kernel.org,
	martin.lau@kernel.org, joel@joelfernandes.org,
	paulmck@kernel.org, eyal.birger@gmail.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jon Maxwell <jmaxwell37@gmail.com>,
	Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it>
Subject: [net-next] ipv6: remove max_size check inline with ipv4
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 08:33:06 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230111213306.265239-1-jmaxwell37@gmail.com> (raw)

Sending Ipv6 packets in a loop via a raw socket triggers an issue where a 
route is cloned by ip6_rt_cache_alloc() for each packet sent. This quickly 
consumes the Ipv6 max_size threshold which defaults to 4096 resulting in 
these warnings:

[1]   99.187805] dst_alloc: 7728 callbacks suppressed
[2] Route cache is full: consider increasing sysctl net.ipv6.route.max_size.
.
.
[300] Route cache is full: consider increasing sysctl net.ipv6.route.max_size.

When this happens the packet is dropped and sendto() gets a network is 
unreachable error:

# ./a.out -s 

remaining pkt 200557 errno 101
remaining pkt 196462 errno 101
.
.
remaining pkt 126821 errno 101

Implement David Aherns suggestion to remove max_size check seeing that Ipv6 
has a GC to manage memory usage. Ipv4 already does not check max_size.

Here are some memory comparisons for Ipv4 vs Ipv6 with the patch:

Test by running 5 instances of a program that sends UDP packets to a raw 
socket 5000000 times. Compare Ipv4 and Ipv6 performance with a similar 
program.

Ipv4: 

Before test:

# grep -e Slab -e Free /proc/meminfo
MemFree:        29427108 kB
Slab:             237612 kB

# grep dst_cache /proc/slabinfo
ip6_dst_cache       1912   2528    256   32    2 : tunables    0    0    0 
xfrm_dst_cache         0      0    320   25    2 : tunables    0    0    0 
ip_dst_cache        2881   3990    192   42    2 : tunables    0    0    0 

During test:

# grep -e Slab -e Free /proc/meminfo
MemFree:        29417608 kB
Slab:             247712 kB

# grep dst_cache /proc/slabinfo
ip6_dst_cache       1912   2528    256   32    2 : tunables    0    0    0 
xfrm_dst_cache         0      0    320   25    2 : tunables    0    0    0 
ip_dst_cache       44394  44394    192   42    2 : tunables    0    0    0 

After test:

# grep -e Slab -e Free /proc/meminfo
MemFree:        29422308 kB
Slab:             238104 kB

# grep dst_cache /proc/slabinfo
ip6_dst_cache       1912   2528    256   32    2 : tunables    0    0    0 
xfrm_dst_cache         0      0    320   25    2 : tunables    0    0    0 
ip_dst_cache        3048   4116    192   42    2 : tunables    0    0    0 

Ipv6 with patch:

Errno 101 errors are not observed anymore with the patch.

Before test:

# grep -e Slab -e Free /proc/meminfo
MemFree:        29422308 kB
Slab:             238104 kB

# grep dst_cache /proc/slabinfo
ip6_dst_cache       1912   2528    256   32    2 : tunables    0    0    0 
xfrm_dst_cache         0      0    320   25    2 : tunables    0    0    0 
ip_dst_cache        3048   4116    192   42    2 : tunables    0    0    0 

During Test:

# grep -e Slab -e Free /proc/meminfo
MemFree:        29431516 kB
Slab:             240940 kB

# grep dst_cache /proc/slabinfo
ip6_dst_cache      11980  12064    256   32    2 : tunables    0    0    0
xfrm_dst_cache         0      0    320   25    2 : tunables    0    0    0
ip_dst_cache        3048   4116    192   42    2 : tunables    0    0    0

After Test:

# grep -e Slab -e Free /proc/meminfo
MemFree:        29441816 kB
Slab:             238132 kB

# grep dst_cache /proc/slabinfo
ip6_dst_cache       1902   2432    256   32    2 : tunables    0    0    0
xfrm_dst_cache         0      0    320   25    2 : tunables    0    0    0
ip_dst_cache        3048   4116    192   42    2 : tunables    0    0    0

Tested-by: Andrea Mayer <andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it>
Signed-off-by: Jon Maxwell <jmaxwell37@gmail.com>
---
 include/net/dst_ops.h |  2 +-
 net/core/dst.c        |  8 ++------
 net/ipv6/route.c      | 13 +++++--------
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/net/dst_ops.h b/include/net/dst_ops.h
index 88ff7bb2bb9b..632086b2f644 100644
--- a/include/net/dst_ops.h
+++ b/include/net/dst_ops.h
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ struct dst_ops {
 	unsigned short		family;
 	unsigned int		gc_thresh;
 
-	int			(*gc)(struct dst_ops *ops);
+	void			(*gc)(struct dst_ops *ops);
 	struct dst_entry *	(*check)(struct dst_entry *, __u32 cookie);
 	unsigned int		(*default_advmss)(const struct dst_entry *);
 	unsigned int		(*mtu)(const struct dst_entry *);
diff --git a/net/core/dst.c b/net/core/dst.c
index 6d2dd03dafa8..31c08a3386d3 100644
--- a/net/core/dst.c
+++ b/net/core/dst.c
@@ -82,12 +82,8 @@ void *dst_alloc(struct dst_ops *ops, struct net_device *dev,
 
 	if (ops->gc &&
 	    !(flags & DST_NOCOUNT) &&
-	    dst_entries_get_fast(ops) > ops->gc_thresh) {
-		if (ops->gc(ops)) {
-			pr_notice_ratelimited("Route cache is full: consider increasing sysctl net.ipv6.route.max_size.\n");
-			return NULL;
-		}
-	}
+	    dst_entries_get_fast(ops) > ops->gc_thresh)
+		ops->gc(ops);
 
 	dst = kmem_cache_alloc(ops->kmem_cachep, GFP_ATOMIC);
 	if (!dst)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index e74e0361fd92..53b09de61a4a 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static struct dst_entry *ip6_negative_advice(struct dst_entry *);
 static void		ip6_dst_destroy(struct dst_entry *);
 static void		ip6_dst_ifdown(struct dst_entry *,
 				       struct net_device *dev, int how);
-static int		 ip6_dst_gc(struct dst_ops *ops);
+static void		 ip6_dst_gc(struct dst_ops *ops);
 
 static int		ip6_pkt_discard(struct sk_buff *skb);
 static int		ip6_pkt_discard_out(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
@@ -3284,11 +3284,10 @@ struct dst_entry *icmp6_dst_alloc(struct net_device *dev,
 	return dst;
 }
 
-static int ip6_dst_gc(struct dst_ops *ops)
+static void ip6_dst_gc(struct dst_ops *ops)
 {
 	struct net *net = container_of(ops, struct net, ipv6.ip6_dst_ops);
 	int rt_min_interval = net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_gc_min_interval;
-	int rt_max_size = net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_max_size;
 	int rt_elasticity = net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_gc_elasticity;
 	int rt_gc_timeout = net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_gc_timeout;
 	unsigned long rt_last_gc = net->ipv6.ip6_rt_last_gc;
@@ -3296,11 +3295,10 @@ static int ip6_dst_gc(struct dst_ops *ops)
 	int entries;
 
 	entries = dst_entries_get_fast(ops);
-	if (entries > rt_max_size)
+	if (entries > gc_thresh)
 		entries = dst_entries_get_slow(ops);
 
-	if (time_after(rt_last_gc + rt_min_interval, jiffies) &&
-	    entries <= rt_max_size)
+	if (time_after(rt_last_gc + rt_min_interval, jiffies))
 		goto out;
 
 	fib6_run_gc(atomic_inc_return(&net->ipv6.ip6_rt_gc_expire), net, true);
@@ -3310,7 +3308,6 @@ static int ip6_dst_gc(struct dst_ops *ops)
 out:
 	val = atomic_read(&net->ipv6.ip6_rt_gc_expire);
 	atomic_set(&net->ipv6.ip6_rt_gc_expire, val - (val >> rt_elasticity));
-	return entries > rt_max_size;
 }
 
 static int ip6_nh_lookup_table(struct net *net, struct fib6_config *cfg,
@@ -6512,7 +6509,7 @@ static int __net_init ip6_route_net_init(struct net *net)
 #endif
 
 	net->ipv6.sysctl.flush_delay = 0;
-	net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_max_size = 4096;
+	net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_max_size = INT_MAX;
 	net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_gc_min_interval = HZ / 2;
 	net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_gc_timeout = 60*HZ;
 	net->ipv6.sysctl.ip6_rt_gc_interval = 30*HZ;
-- 
2.31.1


             reply	other threads:[~2023-01-11 21:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-11 21:33 Jon Maxwell [this message]
2023-01-12  1:06 ` [net-next] ipv6: remove max_size check inline with ipv4 kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230111213306.265239-1-jmaxwell37@gmail.com \
    --to=jmaxwell37@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrea.mayer@uniroma2.it \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eyal.birger@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).