From: Andrew Halaney <ahalaney@redhat.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, peppe.cavallaro@st.com,
alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, joabreu@synopsys.com,
edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, richardcochran@gmail.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ning Cai <ncai@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: stmmac: enable all safety features by default
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 09:30:54 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230118153054.22vs2sqsuxifjpxg@halaney-x13s> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230117194348.3f098a18@kernel.org>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 07:43:48PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jan 2023 13:37:23 -0600 Andrew Halaney wrote:
> > I've been working on a newer Qualcomm platform (sa8540p-ride) which has
> > a variant of dwmac5 in it. This patch is something Ning stumbled on when
> > adding some support for it downstream, and has been in my queue as I try
> > and get some support ready for review on list upstream.
> >
> > Since it isn't really related to the particular hardware I decided to
> > pop it on list now. Please let me know if instead of enabling by default
> > (which the original implementation did and is why I went that route) a
> > message like "Safety features detected but not enabled in software" is
> > preferred and platforms are skipped unless they opt-in for enablement.
>
> Could you repost and CC Wong Vee Khee, and maybe some other Intel folks
> who have been touching stmmac recently? They are probably the best to
> comment / review.
>
Shoot, yes thank you I intended to do! Will resend.
- Andrew
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-18 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-16 19:37 [PATCH net] net: stmmac: enable all safety features by default Andrew Halaney
2023-01-18 3:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-18 15:30 ` Andrew Halaney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230118153054.22vs2sqsuxifjpxg@halaney-x13s \
--to=ahalaney@redhat.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=ncai@quicinc.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox