From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0507CC00A5A for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 11:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231135AbjASLiK (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2023 06:38:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46482 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231136AbjASLhm (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Jan 2023 06:37:42 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x632.google.com (mail-ej1-x632.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::632]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 571E775A21; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 03:36:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-ej1-x632.google.com with SMTP id u19so4855384ejm.8; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 03:36:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cvYFLl9LiwvzqsWZZbX+Ppnx6x1WOa2RlZddWq2EK6I=; b=ZHnCCW4Gh7EIiUGOuqiOZtsxeVAjpJc76Jd4eEWuWb5D5U9PR6PA3PA9YG+s8lkW/5 tFAYvhoOk7RGa8IqLwlCM+U8oprPiFDvjoEu+LFnmgF8+zua+0NR3AcVw5i517jvvl1w KmqKGl5RvsBjKr7VsNyc7BKBUxLJSV/L2Wzio9SA9X3jk0o/uNkHM5XE7yW4ZU4twIt0 ldUYsVgi8ol+g038rOHrVaE7EWeP9xk/ybH1a/MWTLfhFfu3gShw2eCQObOJ+sM9KL8+ Y+ZvKvzLt41u2c+ZQTAWfbQWJpfNJXbs1d/MzUFcxr2ImCUWAzJIEiQ7EAPTBVLlpdGX SPhA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=cvYFLl9LiwvzqsWZZbX+Ppnx6x1WOa2RlZddWq2EK6I=; b=K1nw+uDrZAtRJSpu1+ILqhFQetW8/OBa27RqPG7r4ZsRUYprwd6aCnLP7PvTum8tKt 0asBdT6vcn+d60vVdzE5QwTGqJj1OhwURLF38LojAMG+C8KDaEmgPAGVoMbTq77plKtD qJZqWyyxsa6zZd0SeG6XrNbsudKR1XU1bUt6eY/vCeKl4tmhWIvy9L2FawWE3mp/ao5C Mja5kZRYsmTGZq2Qizp3ocAY0AC60VQl+iFskaINmq1H7ORNZS5AZj8ojalNMd8WG+ip l3lWe+szTGFkXn8tl1wSioKTITfdcF+RSuAPZtysteWP8t1KePwIz42SXTuCtpnPSvo/ 0vig== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kqCsr8+x7+Fy89pBzei6Wm11QEq35acn6b5gA/MXjusc+HUO34+ O/4xHcIYOxEqgOZsuvwDmW2IQywJFkZGkw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXt7L2rPF1Xw2fqGBl9xVE/dhQGwIpoQxryv7a2IrxLWoE4/PB8DRdMGhx6XwyYSWzWsFyd7NA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:415:b0:7c1:2e19:ba3f with SMTP id d21-20020a170906041500b007c12e19ba3fmr24861529eja.57.1674128163601; Thu, 19 Jan 2023 03:36:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from skbuf ([188.27.185.85]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 21-20020a170906319500b0086faa5b06d4sm6135694ejy.181.2023.01.19.03.36.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 19 Jan 2023 03:36:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 13:36:00 +0200 From: Vladimir Oltean To: Rakesh.Sankaranarayanan@microchip.com Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, pabeni@redhat.com, hkallweit1@gmail.com, Arun.Ramadoss@microchip.com, Woojung.Huh@microchip.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, f.fainelli@gmail.com, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net: dsa: microchip: lan937x: run phy initialization during each link update Message-ID: <20230119113600.xfkkpmdz26og2hn3@skbuf> References: <20230116100500.614444-1-rakesh.sankaranarayanan@microchip.com> <20230116100500.614444-1-rakesh.sankaranarayanan@microchip.com> <20230116100500.614444-3-rakesh.sankaranarayanan@microchip.com> <20230116100500.614444-3-rakesh.sankaranarayanan@microchip.com> <20230116222602.oswnt4ecoucpb2km@skbuf> <7d72bc330d0ce9e57cc862bec39388b7def8782a.camel@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7d72bc330d0ce9e57cc862bec39388b7def8782a.camel@microchip.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 11:34:00AM +0000, Rakesh.Sankaranarayanan@microchip.com wrote: > Thanks for pointing this out. Do you think submitting this patch in > net-next is the right way? Hmm, I guess you could submit it to 'net'.