Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/9] e1000e: Remove redundant pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting()

[Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>]

[+cc Sathy]

On Thu, Jan 19, 2023 at 10:28:16AM -0800, Tony Nguyen wrote:
> On 1/18/2023 3:46 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > 
> > pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() enables the device to send ERR_*
> > Messages.  Since f26e58bf6f54 ("PCI/AER: Enable error reporting when AER is
> > native"), the PCI core does this for all devices during enumeration.
> > 
> > Remove the redundant pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() call from the
> > driver.  Also remove the corresponding pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting()
> > from the driver .remove() path.
> > 
> > Note that this doesn't control interrupt generation by the Root Port; that
> > is controlled by the AER Root Error Command register, which is managed by
> > the AER service driver.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
> > Cc: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
> > Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
> > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> > ---
> >   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 7 -------
> >   1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>

Thanks a million for taking a look at these, Tony!

These driver patches are all independent and have no dependency on the
1/9 PCI/AER patch.  What's your opinion on merging these?  Should they
go via netdev?  Should they be squashed into a single patch that does
all the Intel drivers at once?

I'm happy to squash them and/or merge them via the PCI tree, whatever
is easiest.

Bjorn