netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>, <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy 
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH 2/9] e1000e: Remove redundant pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting()
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2023 21:35:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230119213557.57598e8f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2c722338-c113-14a1-040b-70326e2e2451@intel.com>

On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 13:31:39 -0800 Tony Nguyen wrote:
> > Thanks a million for taking a look at these, Tony!
> > 
> > These driver patches are all independent and have no dependency on the
> > 1/9 PCI/AER patch.  What's your opinion on merging these?  Should they
> > go via netdev?  Should they be squashed into a single patch that does
> > all the Intel drivers at once?
> > 
> > I'm happy to squash them and/or merge them via the PCI tree, whatever
> > is easiest.  
> 
> Since there's no dependency, IMO, it'd make sense to go through 
> Intel-wired-lan/netdev. Keeping them per driver is fine.

Ah, damn, I spammed Bjorn with the same question because email was
pooped most of the day :/ Reportedly not vger, email in general but 
fool me once...

Tony, if you could take these via your tree that'd be best.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-20  5:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20230118234612.272916-1-helgaas@kernel.org>
2023-01-18 23:46 ` [PATCH 2/9] e1000e: Remove redundant pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting() Bjorn Helgaas
2023-01-19 18:28   ` Tony Nguyen
2023-01-19 18:40     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Bjorn Helgaas
2023-01-19 21:31       ` Tony Nguyen
2023-01-20  5:35         ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2023-01-20  3:17   ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-20 13:14     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Bjorn Helgaas
2023-01-18 23:46 ` [PATCH 3/9] fm10k: " Bjorn Helgaas
2023-01-19 18:28   ` Tony Nguyen
2023-01-18 23:46 ` [PATCH 4/9] i40e: " Bjorn Helgaas
2023-01-19 18:28   ` Tony Nguyen
2023-01-25 10:34   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " G, GurucharanX
2023-01-18 23:46 ` [PATCH 5/9] iavf: " Bjorn Helgaas
2023-01-19 18:28   ` Tony Nguyen
2023-01-18 23:46 ` [PATCH 6/9] ice: " Bjorn Helgaas
2023-01-19 18:28   ` Tony Nguyen
2023-01-25  9:08   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " G, GurucharanX
2023-01-18 23:46 ` [PATCH 7/9] igb: " Bjorn Helgaas
2023-01-19 18:28   ` Tony Nguyen
2023-01-25  9:09   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " G, GurucharanX
2023-01-18 23:46 ` [PATCH 8/9] igc: " Bjorn Helgaas
2023-01-19 18:28   ` Tony Nguyen
2023-01-24 11:33   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " naamax.meir
2023-01-18 23:46 ` [PATCH 9/9] ixgbe: " Bjorn Helgaas
2023-01-19 18:28   ` Tony Nguyen
2023-01-25  9:09   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " G, GurucharanX
2023-01-26 23:15 ` [PATCH 0/9] PCI/AER: Remove redundant Device Control Error Reporting Enable Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230119213557.57598e8f@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).