netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] net: introduce rps_default_mask
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 13:52:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230130135221.3deeed6c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6758c48d926845ae323a68fb4649fb982e2321c4.camel@redhat.com>

On Mon, 30 Jan 2023 10:25:34 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Let me try for a moment to revive this old thread.
> 
> Tha series proposed a new sysctl know to implement a global/default rps
> mask applying to all the network devices as a way to simplify some RT
> setups. It has been rejected as the required task is doable in user-
> space.
> 
> Currently the orchestration infrastructure does that, setting the per
> device, per queue rps mask and CPU isolation.
> 
> The above leads to a side problem: when there are lot of netns/devices
> with several queues, even a reasonably optimized user-space solution
> takes a relevant amount of time to traverse the relevant sysfs dirs and
> do I/O on them. Overall the additional time required is very
> measurable, easily ranging in seconds.
> 
> The default_rps_mask would basically kill that overhead.
> 
> Is the above a suitable use case?

Alright, thanks for trying the user space fix.

      reply	other threads:[~2023-01-30 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-30 11:16 [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] net: introduce rps_default_mask Paolo Abeni
2020-10-30 11:16 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/3] net/sysctl: factor-out netdev_rx_queue_set_rps_mask() helper Paolo Abeni
2020-10-30 11:16 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net/core: introduce default_rps_mask netns attribute Paolo Abeni
2020-10-30 11:16 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/3] self-tests: introduce self-tests for RPS default mask Paolo Abeni
2020-11-02 22:54 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/3] net: introduce rps_default_mask Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-02 23:27   ` Saeed Mahameed
2020-11-03 15:22   ` Paolo Abeni
2020-11-03 16:52     ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-04 17:36       ` Paolo Abeni
2020-11-04 18:18         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-11-04 19:42         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-01-30  9:25           ` Paolo Abeni
2023-01-30 21:52             ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230130135221.3deeed6c@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=saeed@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).