From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
"Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean)" <sforshee@digitalocean.com>,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] vhost: improve livepatch switching for heavily loaded vhost worker kthreads
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 11:48:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230130194823.6y3rc227bvsgele4@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y9gOMCWGmoc5GQMj@FVFF77S0Q05N>
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 06:36:32PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 01:40:18PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 02:11:31PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > @@ -8500,8 +8502,10 @@ EXPORT_STATIC_CALL_TRAMP(might_resched);
> > > static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(sk_dynamic_cond_resched);
> > > int __sched dynamic_cond_resched(void)
> > > {
> > > - if (!static_branch_unlikely(&sk_dynamic_cond_resched))
> > > + if (!static_branch_unlikely(&sk_dynamic_cond_resched)) {
> > > + klp_sched_try_switch();
> > > return 0;
> > > + }
> > > return __cond_resched();
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(dynamic_cond_resched);
> >
> > I would make the klp_sched_try_switch() not depend on
> > sk_dynamic_cond_resched, because __cond_resched() is not a guaranteed
> > pass through __schedule().
> >
> > But you'll probably want to check with Mark here, this all might
> > generate crap code on arm64.
>
> IIUC here klp_sched_try_switch() is a static call, so on arm64 this'll generate
> at least a load, a conditional branch, and an indirect branch. That's not
> ideal, but I'd have to benchmark it to find out whether it's a significant
> overhead relative to the baseline of PREEMPT_DYNAMIC.
>
> For arm64 it'd be a bit nicer to have another static key check, and a call to
> __klp_sched_try_switch(). That way the static key check gets turned into a NOP
> in the common case, and the call to __klp_sched_try_switch() can be a direct
> call (potentially a tail-call if we made it return 0).
Hm, it might be nice if our out-of-line static call implementation would
automatically do a static key check as part of static_call_cond() for
NULL-type static calls.
But the best answer is probably to just add inline static calls to
arm64. Is the lack of objtool the only thing blocking that?
Objtool is now modular, so all the controversial CFG reverse engineering
is now optional, so it shouldn't be too hard to just enable objtool for
static call inlines.
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-30 19:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-20 22:12 [PATCH 0/2] vhost: improve livepatch switching for heavily loaded vhost worker kthreads Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean)
2023-01-20 22:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] livepatch: add an interface for safely switching kthreads Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean)
2023-01-20 22:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] vhost: check for pending livepatches from vhost worker kthreads Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean)
2023-01-24 14:17 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-24 17:21 ` Seth Forshee
2023-01-25 11:34 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-25 16:57 ` Seth Forshee
2023-01-26 11:16 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-26 11:49 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-22 8:34 ` [PATCH 0/2] vhost: improve livepatch switching for heavily loaded " Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-01-26 17:03 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-26 21:12 ` Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean)
2023-01-27 4:43 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-27 10:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-27 12:09 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-27 14:37 ` Seth Forshee
2023-01-27 16:52 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-27 17:09 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-27 22:11 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-30 12:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-30 17:50 ` Seth Forshee
2023-01-30 18:18 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-30 18:36 ` Mark Rutland
2023-01-30 19:48 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2023-01-31 1:53 ` Song Liu
2023-01-31 10:22 ` Mark Rutland
2023-01-31 16:38 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-02-01 11:10 ` Mark Rutland
2023-02-01 16:57 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-02-01 17:11 ` Mark Rutland
2023-01-30 19:59 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-31 10:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-01-27 20:02 ` Seth Forshee
2023-01-27 11:19 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-27 14:57 ` Seth Forshee
2023-01-30 9:55 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230130194823.6y3rc227bvsgele4@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=joe.lawrence@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=sforshee@digitalocean.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).