From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] virtio-net: fix possible unsigned integer overflow
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2023 03:07:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230202030550-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230131085004.98687-1-hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 04:50:04PM +0800, Heng Qi wrote:
> When the single-buffer xdp is loaded and after xdp_linearize_page()
> is called, *num_buf becomes 0 and (*num_buf - 1) may overflow into
> a large integer in virtnet_build_xdp_buff_mrg(), resulting in
> unexpected packet dropping.
>
> Fixes: ef75cb51f139 ("virtio-net: build xdp_buff with multi buffers")
> Signed-off-by: Heng Qi <hengqi@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
> v1->v2:
> - Change the type of num_buf from unsigned int to int. @Michael S . Tsirkin
> - Some cleaner codes. @Michael S . Tsirkin
>
> drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 15 +++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index aaa6fe9b214a..8102861785a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ static unsigned int virtnet_get_headroom(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> * have enough headroom.
> */
> static struct page *xdp_linearize_page(struct receive_queue *rq,
> - u16 *num_buf,
> + int *num_buf,
> struct page *p,
> int offset,
> int page_off,
> @@ -816,7 +816,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_small(struct net_device *dev,
> if (unlikely(xdp_headroom < virtnet_get_headroom(vi))) {
> int offset = buf - page_address(page) + header_offset;
> unsigned int tlen = len + vi->hdr_len;
> - u16 num_buf = 1;
> + int num_buf = 1;
>
> xdp_headroom = virtnet_get_headroom(vi);
> header_offset = VIRTNET_RX_PAD + xdp_headroom;
> @@ -989,7 +989,7 @@ static int virtnet_build_xdp_buff_mrg(struct net_device *dev,
> void *buf,
> unsigned int len,
> unsigned int frame_sz,
> - u16 *num_buf,
> + int *num_buf,
> unsigned int *xdp_frags_truesize,
> struct virtnet_rq_stats *stats)
> {
> @@ -1007,6 +1007,9 @@ static int virtnet_build_xdp_buff_mrg(struct net_device *dev,
> xdp_prepare_buff(xdp, buf - VIRTIO_XDP_HEADROOM,
> VIRTIO_XDP_HEADROOM + vi->hdr_len, len - vi->hdr_len, true);
>
> + if (!*num_buf)
> + return 0;
> +
> if (*num_buf > 1) {
> /* If we want to build multi-buffer xdp, we need
> * to specify that the flags of xdp_buff have the
Ouch. Why is this here? Merged so pls remove by a follow up patch, the
rest of the code handles 0 fine. I'm not sure this introduces a bug by
we don't want spaghetti code.
> @@ -1020,10 +1023,10 @@ static int virtnet_build_xdp_buff_mrg(struct net_device *dev,
> shinfo->xdp_frags_size = 0;
> }
>
> - if ((*num_buf - 1) > MAX_SKB_FRAGS)
> + if (*num_buf > MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - while ((--*num_buf) >= 1) {
> + while (--*num_buf > 0) {
> buf = virtqueue_get_buf_ctx(rq->vq, &len, &ctx);
> if (unlikely(!buf)) {
> pr_debug("%s: rx error: %d buffers out of %d missing\n",
> @@ -1076,7 +1079,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *receive_mergeable(struct net_device *dev,
> struct virtnet_rq_stats *stats)
> {
> struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *hdr = buf;
> - u16 num_buf = virtio16_to_cpu(vi->vdev, hdr->num_buffers);
> + int num_buf = virtio16_to_cpu(vi->vdev, hdr->num_buffers);
> struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(buf);
> int offset = buf - page_address(page);
> struct sk_buff *head_skb, *curr_skb;
> --
> 2.19.1.6.gb485710b
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-02 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-31 8:50 [PATCH net-next v2] virtio-net: fix possible unsigned integer overflow Heng Qi
2023-02-02 6:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-02-02 8:07 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2023-02-02 8:14 ` Heng Qi
2023-02-02 8:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-02 9:07 ` Heng Qi
2023-02-02 10:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-02-02 10:55 ` Heng Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230202030550-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hengqi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).